Skip to main content

How to execute a function in the package from java?


I use Wolfram Workbench 2.0. I can get a KernelLink object and evaluate some simple expressions like "2+2". But I don't know how to export a package and execute any functions from Java code. Please, show me any example.



Answer



Preamble


In fact, the relevant example can be found in the documentation, here, in the "Sample program" section. To make this useful also for folks who don't have experience with Java development in WorkBench, I will illustrate how this can be done from within Mathematica, by using the interactive Java reloader from this post. You will have to figure out how to run this from within WorkBench, but this should not be really hard.


Illustration from within Mathematica


Sample code


I will construct a sample class which loads the CompiledFunctionTools` package and prints to the Java console the result of CompilePrint function applied to some sample Compile-d function, such as e.g. Compile[{x}, x + Sin[x]]. This is pretty much an adaptation of the example from JLink Help, linked above.


samplecode = 
"

import com.wolfram.jlink.*;

public class SampleProgram {
public static void main(String[] argv) {
KernelLink ml = null;
try {
ml = MathLinkFactory.createKernelLink(argv);
} catch (MathLinkException e) {
System.out.println(\"Fatal error opening link: \"
+ e.getMessage());

return;
}
try {
// Get rid of the initial InputNamePacket the kernel will send
// when it is launched.
ml.discardAnswer();

ml.evaluate(\"Needs[\\\"CompiledFunctionTools`\\\"]\");
ml.discardAnswer();


String strResult =
ml.evaluateToOutputForm(
\"CompilePrint[Compile[{x},x+Sin[x]]]\", 0);
System.out.println(
\"Instructions for function Compile[{x},x+Sin[x]]: \"
+ strResult);

ml.putFunction(\"EvaluatePacket\", 1);
ml.putFunction(\"CompilePrint\", 1);
ml.putFunction(\"Compile\",2);

ml.putFunction(\"List\",1);
ml.putSymbol(\"x\");
ml.putFunction(\"Plus\",2);
ml.putSymbol(\"x\");
ml.putFunction(\"Sin\",1);
ml.putSymbol(\"x\");
ml.endPacket();
ml.waitForAnswer();
strResult = ml.getString();
System.out.println(

\"Now conbining function call from pieces: \" + strResult);

} catch (MathLinkException e) {
System.out.println(\"MathLinkException occurred: \"
+ e.getMessage());
} finally {
ml.close();
}
}
}";


Load Java reloader


Now, you have to either copy and paste the code for the Java reloader from the link above, and run it in Front-End, or put that code in a package, place it where Mathematica can find it (e.g. FileNameJoin[{$UserBaseDirectory,"Applications"}], and call Needs["SimpleJavaReloader`"].


Using Java reloader


First, we will have to add the jlink.jar to Java classpath for Java compiler. Here is the standard location of it:


jlinkpath =  FileNameJoin[{$InstallationDirectory, "SystemFiles", "Links", 
"JLink", "JLink.jar"}]

Let us check that the files exists:


FileExistsQ[jlinkpath]



True

We are now ready to compile it:


JCompileLoad[samplecode,{jlinkpath}]


 JavaClass[SampleProgram,<>]


The class has been (hopefully) compiled and loaded by now. To see the output it produces, we can enable the Java console:


ShowJavaConsole[]

Now we make a call:


SampleProgram`main[{"-linkmode", "launch", "-linkname", 
"c:\\program files\\wolfram research\\mathematica\\8.0\\mathkernel.exe"}]

You will have to adjust the path to the mathkernel executable for your machine (I assume you are on Windows. For other platforms, the mentioned section of JLink Help lists the right commands to launch the kernel).


We now call the Java console again:


ShowJavaConsole[]


Here is the screenshot of the Java console on my machine after that:


enter image description here


WorkBench


While I did not try using WorkBench with this, this should be even simpler:



  • Create a Java project in WB

  • Create a source file for your class

  • Add jlink.jar to the set of libraries used in the project (I assume you know how to do that)

  • You will have to run the math kernel from the Java process, perhaps by calling the Process class, or by any other means.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.