Skip to main content

differential equations - NDSolve in NIntegrate function, numerical values as a symbolic variables


I'm trying to implement the following iterative scheme $g_{n+1}=g_n-\int_0^t\Phi(g_n) dt$, where $g_n$ is a source term in a PDE and $\Phi$ is the solution of an adjoit problem associated to the PDE which use the solution of the PDE as final data. to this aim we need many steps :



0) Take $g_0=0$.


1) Solve the PDE to obtain the solution $u(t,x,g_n)$.


2) Solve the adjoint PDE to obtain $\Phi(t,x,g_n)$.


3) Calculate $g_{n+1}(x)=g_n(x)-\int_0^t\Phi(t,x,g_n) dt$, and go to 1).




I tried this one


nsol = NDSolve[{D[u[t, x], t] == D[u[t, x], x, x] + #, u[0, x] == 1, 
u[t, 0] == u[t, 1] == 1}, u, {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}] &; (* Solve the pde with source # *)

nasol = NDSolve[{D[v[t, x], t] == -D[v[t, x], x, x], 
 v[1, x] == First[u[1, x] /. nsol[#]] - umes[x], 
 v[t, 0] == v[t, 1] == -0.05}, v, {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}] &; (* Solve the adjont problem *)

Phi := NIntegrate[Evaluate[First[v[t, #2] /. nasol[#1[x]]]], {t, 0, 1}]&;

(* Calculate the integral in step 3). Here is the problem !!*)

g[0][x_] := 0;
umes[x_] := First[u[1, x] /. nsol[g[0][x]]] + 0.05;
g[n_Integer?Positive][x_] := g[n - 1][x] - Phi[g[n - 1], x];(* iteration *)

Now when I test the program, it seems to work in a good way


In[68]:= Phi[g[0], 0.1]
Out[68]= -0.05
In[70]:= g[1][0.1]

Out[70]= 0.05

To turn the loop for calculating the function $g_2$ we need to put $g_1$ in step 1) and here is the problem : The functions Phi[g[1],x] is just a numerical function and not working for symbolic variable $x$ because of the NIntegrate. Hence, the same problem for g[1][x].


Here is the Mathematica error


In[80]:= Phi[g[0], x]


NIntegrate::inumr: The integrand <<1>> has evaluated to non-numerical values for all sampling points in the region with boundaries {{0,0.0547861}}.



I tried to use NumericQ for the variables but still not working. Also, I don't get how to close the loop using stopping condition like Norm[Phi(g[n][x],x]]<10^{-6}.



Finally, I notice that I'm new to Mathematica. Thanks for any help.



Answer



I show an algorithm for solving such problems. Calculation back is eliminated by replacing t'->-t, {-1,0}->{0,1}:


g[0][x_] := .01*x; n = 5;

Do[nsol[i] = 
  NDSolveValue[{D[u[t, x], t] == D[u[t, x], x, x] + g[i - 1][x], 
    u[0, x] == 1, u[t, 0] == 1, u[t, 1] == 1}, 
   u, {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}];
 nasol[i] = 

  NDSolveValue[{D[v[t, x], t] == D[v[t, x], x, x], 
    v[0, x] == nsol[i][1, x] - nsol[1][1, x] - .05, v[t, 0] == -.05, 
    v[t, 1] == -0.05}, v, {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}];
 g[i] = Interpolation[
   Table[{x, g[i - 1][x] - NIntegrate[nasol[i][t, x], {t, 0, 1}]}, {x,
      0, 1, .1}]];, {i, 1, n}]



 {Plot[Evaluate[Table[g[i][x], {i, 0, n}]], {x, 0, 1}, 

  AxesLabel -> {"x", "g"}], 
 Plot3D[nsol[n][t, x], {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}, Mesh -> None, 
  ColorFunction -> Hue, AxesLabel -> {"t", "x", ""}, 
  PlotLabel -> "nsol[n]"], 
 Plot3D[nasol[n][t, x], {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}, Mesh -> None, 
  ColorFunction -> Hue, AxesLabel -> {"t", "x", ""}, 
  PlotLabel -> "nasol[n]", PlotRange -> All]}

fig1


In the case of 2D +1, we use summation instead of the NIntegrate[]. In this example npoints=8.



<< NumericalDifferentialEquationAnalysis`
gl[npoints_] := 
 Block[{npo = npoints}, {pts, w} = 
   Transpose[GaussianQuadratureWeights[npo, 0, 1]]; {w, pts, npo}]

f[x_, y_] := 1; (* The exact source term to be constructed *)
Plot3D[f[t, x], {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}, 
 ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap", AxesLabel -> {"t", "x", ""}, 
 PlotLabel -> "Source term f(x,y)", PlotLegends -> Automatic]


nsoleq = NDSolveValue[{D[u[t, x, y], t] == 
     D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y] + f[x, y], 
    u[0, x, y] == 0, u[t, x, 0] == 0, u[t, 0, y] == 0, 
    u[t, x, 1] == 0, u[t, 1, y] == 0}, 
   u, {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 
    1}]; (* nsoleq[1,x,y] is the observation used in construction of \
the source term *)
Plot3D[nsoleq[1, x, y], {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}, 
 ColorFunction -> "TemperatureMap", AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", ""}, 
 PlotLabel -> "t=1", PlotLegends -> Automatic]

g[0][x_, y_] := 0.;  (* Initialization of the iteration *)



With[{np0 = 16, np1 = .05, n = 40}, 
 Do[nsol[i] = 
   NDSolveValue[{D[u[t, x, y], t] == 
      D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y] + g[i - 1][x, y], 
     u[0, x, y] == 0, u[t, x, 0] == 0, u[t, 0, y] == 0, 
     u[t, x, 1] == 0, u[t, 1, y] == 0}, 

    u, {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}];

  nasol[i] = 
   NDSolveValue[{D[v[t, x, y], t] == 
      D[v[t, x, y], x, x] + D[v[t, x, y], y, y], 
     v[0, x, y] == nsol[i][1, x, y] - nsoleq[1, x, y], 
     v[t, x, 0] == 0, v[t, 0, y] == 0, v[t, x, 1] == 0, 
     v[t, 1, y] == 0}, v, {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}, 
    Method -> {"MethodOfLines", 
      "SpatialDiscretization" -> {"TensorProductGrid", 

        "MinPoints" -> 5*15 + 1, "MaxPoints" -> 5*15 + 1, 
        "DifferenceOrder" -> Automatic}}];
  pp = Interpolation[
    Chop[Flatten[
      Table[{{x, y}, 
        Sum[nasol[i][gl[np0][[2]][[j]], x, y]*gl[np0][[1]][[j]], {j, 
          1, np0}]}, {x, 0, 1, np1}, {y, 0, 1, np1}], 1]]];
  p[i][x_, y_] := pp[x, y] + 0.000001*g[i - 1][x, y];
  nsol1[i] = 
   NDSolveValue[{D[u[t, x, y], t] == 

      D[u[t, x, y], x, x] + D[u[t, x, y], y, y] + p[i][x, y], 
     u[0, x, y] == 0, u[t, x, 0] == 0, u[t, 0, y] == 0, 
     u[t, x, 1] == 0, u[t, 1, y] == 0}, 
    u, {t, 0, 1}, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}]; 
  a[i] = (NIntegrate[
      p[i][x, y]^2, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 
       1}])/(NIntegrate[(nsol1[i][1, x, y])^2, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}]);
  g[i] = Interpolation[
    Flatten[Table[{{x, y}, g[i - 1][x, y] - a[i]*(p[i][x, y])}, {x, 0,
        1, np1}, {y, 0, 1, np1}], 1]]; npr = i; 

  If[Abs[g[i][.5, .5] - g[i - 1][.5, .5]] <= 10^-5, Break[]], {i, 1, 
   n}]]
{Plot3D[f[x, y], {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}, PlotLabel -> "Exact Source"], 
 Plot3D[g[n][x, y], {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}, 
  PlotLabel -> "Constructed Source", PlotRange -> All]}

fig2


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more