Skip to main content

options - How to extract a list of available Method-s


The option Methodapplies for several functions, such as NDSolve, FindRoot, NIntegrate and some others. It is difficult, however, to find a list of Methods for a given function. By digging through tutorials I extracted, for example, a list of Methods for NIntegrate:


"GlobalAdaptive"


"ClenshawCurtisRule"



"NewtonCotesRule",


"GaussKronrodRule",


"ClenshawCurtisRule"


"MultidimensionalRule"


"GaussKronrodRule",


"LobattoKronrodRule"


"SingularityHandler"


"DuffyCoordinates"


"Trapezoidal"


"AdaptiveMonteCarlo"



BDoubleExponentialOscillatory


MultiPeriodic,


MonteCarlo,


QuasiMonteCarlo,


AdaptiveQuasiMonteCarlo


ExtrapolatingOscillatory,


MultiPeriodicDoubleExponentialOscillator,


DoubleExponentialOscillatory


though I am not sure that my collection is complete.


Is there a way to get a complete list of Methods for a given function? I mean not only NIntegratebut also others.




Answer



I use this function


 getList[name_String] := Module[{options, idx}, options = Names[name <> "`*"];
options = ToExpression /@ options;
options = {#, Options[#]} & /@ options;
idx = Range[Length[options]];
options = {#[[1]], TableForm[#[[2]]]} & /@ options;
options = Insert[options[[#]], #, 1] & /@ idx;
options = Insert[options, {"#", "Option", "Options to this option"}, 1]
];


To use:


r = getList["NIntegrate"];
Grid[r, Frame -> All, Alignment -> Left, FrameStyle -> Directive[Thickness[.005],
Gray]]

Mathematica graphics


I modified the above a bit based on function I think I got from one of the Mathematica Guide books but I do not remember now which book it was. The methods can be seen under the third column there by looking for Method-> there. At least this is much easier than having to scan pages and pages of help looking for these things.


Replace the name of the command above to get other functions. To filter the Method-> part automatically, one possible way would be to use Cases or some pattern on the result r above. This is left as an exercise for the pattern experts out there.


Update Response to comment below. I made new version called getList2 which only shows up the options with Method on them. I am sure this could be written better, but I am not good with patterns. Here we go



getList2[name_String] := Module[{options, idx,z1,z2},
options = Names[name <> "`*"];
options = ToExpression /@ options;
options = Flatten[Last@Reap@Do[z1 = Options[options[[i]]];
If[z1 != {},
z2 = Cases[z1, Rule["Method", x_] :> Method -> x];
If[Length[z2] != 0 , Sow[{options[[i]], z2}]]
],
{i, Length[options]}
], 1];

(* rest for formatting*)
idx = Range[Length[options]];
options = {#[[1]], TableForm[#[[2]]]} & /@ options;
options = Insert[options[[#]], #, 1] & /@ idx;
options = Insert[options, {"#", "Option", "Options to this option"}, 1]];

Example calls


r = getList2["NIntegrate"];
Grid[r, Frame -> All, Alignment -> Left]


Mathematica graphics


r = getList2["NDSolve"];
Grid[r, Frame -> All, Alignment -> Left]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.