Skip to main content

differential equations - Using NDSolve to find particle trajectory


I'm trying to simulate a particle in an electric and magnetic fields, but numerically instead of analytically. This is basically solving the equation


$$q \cdot \left(p'\times B\right) + q\cdot E = m p'',$$


where $p(t)$ is the position in $(x,y,z)$ coordinates.


After viewing a few topics on this site, I've got a good idea on how to get the solution using NDSolve, but my program gets stuck, and doesn't come up with anything.


b = {1, 0, 0};
e = {0, 0, 1};
q = 1;

m = 1;

sol = NDSolve[ {q*e + q*Cross[D[pos[t], t], b] == m D[pos[t], {t, 2}],
pos[0] == {0, 0, 0}, (D[pos[t], t] /. t -> 0) == {0, 0, 0}},
pos, {t, 0, 1}];
ParametricPlot3D[Evaluate[pos[t] /. sol], {t, 0, 1}];

It is also worth mentioning that if you remove the $q\cdot E$ term, the calculation is finished, but nothing shows up in the plot.



Answer



The main problem is that your pos is not seen as a 3D vector.



The cross product is therefore interpreted as a scalar:


q*Cross[D[pos[t], t], b]

Mathematica graphics


when adding this to the vector q.e this 'scalar' term is added to each of the vector components:


q*e + q*Cross[D[pos[t], t], b]

Mathematica graphics


This won't work, instead do:


b = {1, 0, 0};

e = {0, 0, 1};
q = 1;
m = 1;

Define pos as a 3D vector. Also take more time than a single second:


ClearAll[pos]
pos[t_] = {px[t], py[t], pz[t]};
sol = NDSolve[
{
q*e + q*Cross[D[pos[t], t], b] == m D[pos[t], {t, 2}],

pos[0] == {0, 0, 0},
(D[pos[t], t] /. t -> 0) == {0, 0, 0}
}, pos[t], {t, 0, 20}]

ParametricPlot3D[Evaluate[pos[t] /. sol], {t, 0, 20}]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.