Skip to main content

plotting - Where is the other half of my fourth degree Bézier curve?


Bug introduced in 10.0.0 and fixed in 10.2




When I enter the following command, half of the fourth-degree spline is missing from the graph (i.e. it doesn't touch the last point). Is this a bug in Mathematica or am I fundamentally misunderstanding something about Bézier curves?


Manipulate[

Graphics[{BezierCurve[pts, SplineDegree -> 4], Dashed, Green,
Line[pts]}, PlotRange -> {{-.5, 1.5}, {-.5, 1.5}},
Frame -> True], {{pts, {{0, 0}, {.5, 0}, {.5, .5}, {1, .5}, {1,
1}}}, Locator, LocatorAutoCreate -> True}]

Here's a screenshot of the output: missing part of fourth-degree Bézier curve


What makes me suspicious is that the same behavior shows up in Mathematica's own help file on BezierCurve.


screenshot of mathematica's help files on BezierCurve



Answer



Since there is really something wrong with the BezierCurve, I made this work-around:



Clear[bezierCurve];

bezierCurve[pts_] :=
First@ParametricPlot[
BezierFunction[pts, SplineDegree -> Length[pts] - 1][t], {t, 0, 1}]

Manipulate[
Graphics[{bezierCurve[pts], Dashed, Green, Line[pts]},
PlotRange -> {{-.5, 1.5}, {-.5, 1.5}},
Frame -> True], {{pts, {{0, 0}, {.5, 0}, {.5, .5}, {1, .5}, {1,

1}}}, Locator, LocatorAutoCreate -> True}]

Since the spline degree is always one less than the length of the point list, I didn't adhere to the built-in syntax where the degree is specified separately through an option. I just let the function bezierCurve compute the appropriate degree automatically, to reduce the potential for error.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...