Skip to main content

differential equations - Only final result from NDSolve


Finally, I started to play with differential equations in Mathematica.


And I have faced the problem, which seems to me so basic that I'm afraid this question is going to be closed soon. However, I've failed in finding solution here or in the documentation center.


My question is: how to set that NDSolve will not save whole InterpolationFunction for the result?



I'm only interested in final coordinates or for example each 100th. Is there simple way to achieve that?




Anticipating questions:




  • I know I can do something like r /@ Range[0.1, 1, .1] /. sol at the end, but still, there is whole interpolating function in memory. I want to avoid it because my final goal is to do N-Body simulation where N is huge and I will run out of the memory quite fast. What is important to me is only the set of coordinates as far in the future as it can be, not intermediate values.




  • I can write something using Do or Nest but I want to avoid it since NDSolve allows us to implement different solving methods in handy way.





  • I saw WolframDemonstrations/CollidingGalaxies and it seems there is an explicit code with Do :-/




  • Another idea would be to put NDSolve into the loop but this seems to be not efficient. Could it be even compilable?






Just in case someone wants to show something, here is some sample code to play with:


G = 4 Pi^2 // N ;


sol = NDSolve[{
r''[t] == -G r[t]/Norm[r[t]]^3,
r[0] == {1, 0, 0},
r'[0] == {0, 2 Pi // N, 0}
},
r,
{t, 0, 1}, Method -> "ExplicitRungeKutta", MaxStepSize -> (1/365 // N)
]


ParametricPlot3D[Evaluate[r[t] /. sol], {t, 0, 1}]

(* Earth orbiting the Sun. Units: Year/AstronomicalUnit/SunMass
in order to express it simply*)

Answer



Here is a solution inspired from tutorial/NDSolveStateData (Mathematica 8):


G = 4 Pi^2 // N;

stateData =
First[

NDSolve`ProcessEquations[
{ r''[t] == -G r[t]/Norm[r[t]]^3,
r[0] == {1, 0, 0},
r'[0] == {0, 2 Pi // N, 0}
},
r,
{t, 0, 1},
Method -> "ExplicitRungeKutta",
MaxStepSize -> (1/365 // N)]]


res = Table[
NDSolve`Iterate[stateData, i/365];
rAndDerivativesValues = NDSolve`ProcessSolutions[stateData, "Forward"];
stateData = First @ NDSolve`Reinitialize[stateData, Equal @@@ Most[rAndDerivativesValues]];
rAndDerivativesValues,
{i, 1, 365, 7 (* 7 = each week*)}
] ;

rAndDerivativesValues is the value of r[t] and its derivative at each week.
Example : example



Here is one revolution of the Earth around the Sun :


ListPointPlot3D[#[[1, 2]] & /@ res ]

weekly Earth positions


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...