Skip to main content

geometry - How to get rotate angle θ of rotated ellipse?



I have ellipse function as below:


−3.06274 x^2 − y^2 + 1192.22 x + 152.71 y + 1.829648 x y − 196494 == 0  

This ellipse looks like: ellipse


How to get the rotate angle of this rotated ellipse?



Answer



Nasser already gave you a solution. There is a different approach though where I used nothing more than the basic knowledge, that an ellipse can be represented by


x2a2+y2b2val=0


and you said in the comments, that you are seeking a quadratic form. Your example shows that the ellipse is shifted and rotated. Let us transform the x and y in the above equation and introduce a shift and a rotation. We use mx and my as translation and phi as rotation and this can be represented by a matrix multiplication


RotationMatrix[phi].{x - mx, y - my}


Now we replace our original x and y with this result


expr = x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 - val /. Thread[{x, y} -> RotationMatrix[phi].{x - mx, y - my}]

We get


((xmx)cos(ϕ)(ymy)sin(ϕ))2a2+((xmx)sin(ϕ)+(ymy)cos(ϕ))2b2val


You can use


expr // ExpandAll

to see all terms. What you should notice is that we have positive terms for y^2 in the form



(y^2 Sin[phi]^2)/a^2

because the sine-squared will always be positive and a^2 too. In your example those terms have a negative coefficient. Since it is an equation, we can simply multiply with -1 to turn everything around


example = (-3.06274*x^2 - y^2 + 1192.22*x + 152.71*y + 1.829648*x*y - 196494)*-1

If you look at the expanded form of expr and the form of your example, you can see that we can now compare coefficients:


eq = Thread[Flatten /@ (CoefficientList[example, {x, y}] == 
CoefficientList[expr, {x, y}])];
eq // Column


Mathematica graphics


When I counted correctly, we have 6 valid equations for 6 parameters mx, my, a, b, phi, and val. Let us try to solve this


sol = Solve[eq, {mx, my, a, b, phi, val}];
sol // Column


Mathematica graphics



Here, you have the full set of solutions (if I'm not mistaken). You see that they mainly differ in a, b, and phi. Thinking about it, this can be easily explained. First, when there are only a^2 and b^2 in the equation, both a and -a are valid solutions. Second, you can have ellipses with larger a or larger b, they only need to be rotated differently. This mix gives the different solutions that are all valid.


Let's test the first solution by replacing the values in our original expr



expr /. sol[[1]] // Expand
(* 196494. - 1192.22 x + 3.06274 x^2 - 152.71 y - 1.82965 x y + 1. y^2 *)

As you can see, we get your original example. The last solution has a phi value of 0.362 which is in degree


phi/(2 Pi)*360 /. sol[[-1]]
(* 20.7865 *)

the same value that Nasser calculated. Finally, if you want to see the quadratic form, you can use this:


With[{e = expr},
HoldForm[e] /. sol[[-1]]

]

((350.067+y)cos(0.362793)+(299.196+x)sin(0.362793))21.237742+((299.196+x)cos(0.362793)(350.067+y)sin(0.362793))20.5415328589.02


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...