Skip to main content

geometry - How to get rotate angle θ of rotated ellipse?



I have ellipse function as below:


−3.06274 x^2 − y^2 + 1192.22 x + 152.71 y + 1.829648 x y − 196494 == 0  

This ellipse looks like: ellipse


How to get the rotate angle of this rotated ellipse?



Answer



Nasser already gave you a solution. There is a different approach though where I used nothing more than the basic knowledge, that an ellipse can be represented by


$$\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}-val=0$$


and you said in the comments, that you are seeking a quadratic form. Your example shows that the ellipse is shifted and rotated. Let us transform the x and y in the above equation and introduce a shift and a rotation. We use mx and my as translation and phi as rotation and this can be represented by a matrix multiplication


RotationMatrix[phi].{x - mx, y - my}


Now we replace our original x and y with this result


expr = x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 - val /. Thread[{x, y} -> RotationMatrix[phi].{x - mx, y - my}]

We get


$$\frac{((x-\text{mx}) \cos (\phi )-(y-\text{my}) \sin (\phi ))^2}{a^2}+\frac{((x-\text{mx}) \sin (\phi )+(y-\text{my}) \cos (\phi ))^2}{b^2}-\text{val}$$


You can use


expr // ExpandAll

to see all terms. What you should notice is that we have positive terms for y^2 in the form



(y^2 Sin[phi]^2)/a^2

because the sine-squared will always be positive and a^2 too. In your example those terms have a negative coefficient. Since it is an equation, we can simply multiply with -1 to turn everything around


example = (-3.06274*x^2 - y^2 + 1192.22*x + 152.71*y + 1.829648*x*y - 196494)*-1

If you look at the expanded form of expr and the form of your example, you can see that we can now compare coefficients:


eq = Thread[Flatten /@ (CoefficientList[example, {x, y}] == 
CoefficientList[expr, {x, y}])];
eq // Column


Mathematica graphics


When I counted correctly, we have 6 valid equations for 6 parameters mx, my, a, b, phi, and val. Let us try to solve this


sol = Solve[eq, {mx, my, a, b, phi, val}];
sol // Column


Mathematica graphics



Here, you have the full set of solutions (if I'm not mistaken). You see that they mainly differ in a, b, and phi. Thinking about it, this can be easily explained. First, when there are only a^2 and b^2 in the equation, both a and -a are valid solutions. Second, you can have ellipses with larger a or larger b, they only need to be rotated differently. This mix gives the different solutions that are all valid.


Let's test the first solution by replacing the values in our original expr



expr /. sol[[1]] // Expand
(* 196494. - 1192.22 x + 3.06274 x^2 - 152.71 y - 1.82965 x y + 1. y^2 *)

As you can see, we get your original example. The last solution has a phi value of 0.362 which is in degree


phi/(2 Pi)*360 /. sol[[-1]]
(* 20.7865 *)

the same value that Nasser calculated. Finally, if you want to see the quadratic form, you can use this:


With[{e = expr},
HoldForm[e] /. sol[[-1]]

]

$$\frac{((-350.067+y) \cos (0.362793)+(-299.196+x) \sin (0.362793))^2}{1.23774^2}+\frac{((-299.196+x) \cos (0.362793)-(-350.067+y) \sin (0.362793))^2}{0.54153^2}-8589.02$$


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...