Skip to main content

plotting - Aligning plot axes in a graphics object


I need to align the y-axes in the plots below. I think I'm going to have to do some rasterizing and searching for vertical lines, then vary x and w. Is there a better way?



a = ListPlot[{{0, 0}, {16, 20}},
   PlotRange -> {{0, 16}, {0, 20}}, Frame -> True];
b = ListPlot[{{0, 0}, {160000, 200000}}, 
   PlotRange -> {{0, 160000}, {0, 200000}}, Frame -> True];
x = 3.1; w = 5;
Graphics[{LightYellow, Rectangle[{0, 0}, {7, 8}], 
  Inset[a, {x, 5.5}, Center, {w, Automatic}], 
  Inset[b, {3.1, 2.2}, Center, {5, Automatic}]}, 
 PlotRange -> {{0, 7}, {0, 8}}, ImageSize -> 300]


enter image description here



Answer



This is a common (and very big) annoyance when creating graphics with subfigures. The most general (but somewhat tedious) solution is setting an explicit ImagePadding:


GraphicsColumn[
 {Show[a, ImagePadding -> {{40, 10}, {Automatic, Automatic}}], 
  Show[b, ImagePadding -> {{40, 10}, {Automatic, Automatic}}]}]

Mathematica graphics


This is tedious because you need to come up with values manually. There are hacks to retrieve the ImagePadding that is used by the Automatic setting. I asked a question about this before. Using Heike's solution from there, we can try to automate the process:


padding[g_Graphics] := 

 With[{im = Image[Show[g, LabelStyle -> White, Background -> White]]},
   BorderDimensions[im]]

ip = 1 + Max /@ Transpose[{First@padding[a], First@padding[b]}]

GraphicsColumn[
 Show[#, ImagePadding -> {ip, {Automatic, Automatic}}] & /@ {a, b}]

The padding detection that's based on rasterizing might be off by a pixel, so I added 1 for safety.


Warning: the automatic padding depends on the image size! The tick marks or labels might "hang out" a bit. You might need to use padding@Show[a, ImageSize -> 100] to get something that'll work for smaller sizes too.



I have used this method myself several times, and while it's a bit tedious at times, it works well (much better than figuring out the image padding manually).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more