Skip to main content

pattern matching - Variable scoping problem when mapping over delayed replacement


This is something that got me curious while I was playing around with Mathematica. Consider the following (contrived) example:


Clear[x,y];

{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}} /. {x_, y_} :> {x, #} & /@ {y, y^2, y^3}
(* {{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}}, {{1, 4}, {3, 16}, {5, 36}}, {{1, 8}, {3, 
64}, {5, 216}}} *)

No problems there.


Now suppose y has been defined globally, so


y = 10;
{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}} /. {x_, y_} :> {x, #} & /@ {y, y^2, y^3}
(* {{{1, 10}, {3, 10}, {5, 10}}, {{1, 100}, {3, 100}, {5, 100}}, {{1, 
1000}, {3, 1000}, {5, 1000}}} *)


The problem is that y gets evaluated to 10 before getting mapped to the delayed rule's rhs.


I realised I could do


{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}} /. {x_, y_} :> {x, 
 ReleaseHold[#]} & /@ Thread[Hold[{y, y^2, y^3}]]
(* {{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}}, {{1, 4}, {3, 16}, {5, 36}}, {{1, 8}, {3, 
64}, {5, 216}}} *)

which looks kinda complicated, but works.


So, is there any better way to "shield" the y in the list being mapped over, from the global variable y?



I sort of randomly tried
Module[{y}, {{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}} /. {x_, y_} :> {x, #} & /@ {y, y^2, y^3}]


but in this case the temporary variable's name(?) got substituted


(* {{{1, y$119596}, {3, y$119596}, {5, y$119596}}, {{1, y$119596^2}, {3, 
   y$119596^2}, {5, y$119596^2}}, {{1, y$119596^3}, {3, 
   y$119596^3}, {5, y$119596^3}}} *)

Answer



You have already seen that there are a number of ways to skin this cat but I'd like to add some comments of my own.


Other approaches


When possible I prefer to avoid these situations in the first place, instead using something like:



{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}} /. {x_, y_} :> Thread@{x, {y, y^2, y^3}} // Thread


{{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}}, {{1, 4}, {3, 16}, {5, 36}}, {{1, 8}, {3, 64}, {5, 216}}}

Here:



  1. Pattern names x and y remain local

  2. Pattern matching is done only once, rather than three times



You can also avoid interactions with global symbols either by using Block or Formal Symbols. Formal Symbols have the Protected attribute and exist expressly for avoiding Imperial Global entanglements. Block requires foreknowledge of the names of the troublesome symbols, and must be updated any time they are to avoid introducing a bug. Example of Block usage:


Block[{y},
 {{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}} /. {x_, y_} :> {x, #} & /@ {y, y^2, y^3}
]


Substitutions inside RuleDelayed


Regarding substitutions into the right-hand side of RuleDelayed there is an important caveat: Mathematica transparently renames variables in nested scoping constructs, including RuleDelayed. Observe:


Cases[Hold[y, y^2, y^3], foo_ :> {x_, y_} :> {x, foo}]



{{x$_, y$_} :> {x$, y}, {x$_, y$_} :> {x$, y^2}, {x$_, y$_} :> {x$, y^3}}

Note that the pattern names on the LHS have changed to x$ and y$ and the RHS does not match. For this reason the best way to make such substitutions is often using a pure function with Slot or SlotSequence (# and ##) parameters which does not cause such renaming to take place. However, pure functions by default will evaluate arguments so you must guard against this. One way is to use Hold and ReleaseHold as you did. Another is to use Unevaluated on each individual argument:


List @@ ({{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}} /. {x_, y_} :> {x, #} & /@ 
   Unevaluated /@ Hold[y, y^2, y^3])

You can also use an undocumented syntax of Function that combines the unnamed Slot parameters with the ability to specify function Attributes:


Function[Null, body, attributes]


Null can be implicit, therefore:


Function[, {{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}} /. {x_, y_} :> {x, #}, HoldAll] /@ 
  Unevaluated[{y, y^2, y^3}]

Note that in this case Unevaluated is used to prevent evaluation not in our Function (as above), but rather in Map (/@).


It is possible to wrestle Mathematica into making the substitution without renaming as described in the linked answer above, e.g.:


rls = Cases[Hold[y, y^2, y^3], foo_ :> RuleDelayed @@ Hold[{x_, y_}, {x, foo}]]


{{x_, y_} :> {x, y}, {x_, y_} :> {x, y^2}, {x_, y_} :> {x, y^3}}


Combined with the syntax expr /. {{rules1}, {rules2}, {rules3}} to apply multiple rule lists we may write:


{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}} /.
 Cases[Hold[y, y^2, y^3], foo_ :> {RuleDelayed @@ Hold[{x_, y_}, {x, foo}]}]


{{{1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}}, {{1, 4}, {3, 16}, {5, 36}}, {{1, 8}, {3, 64}, {5, 216}}}

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more