Skip to main content

differential equations - Defining a non-linear coordinate transformation involving DSolve


This question is related to an other question I've asked yesterday here. Havin not received a reply, I believe there isn't a ready-made function for non-linear coordinate transformation in order to obtain a normal form of an affine state system as in nonlinear control theory. I wish to address here some of the problems in implementing such a function.


We would have the following non-linear control system:



x' = f(x) + g(x) u


y = h(x)


First step As is well explained in this book Isidori, what is firstly necessary is to define a nonlinear coordinate transformation. In order to do this, we ought to firstly define a Lie derivative. I've implemented the following code to do this:


QDim[a_, b_] := TrueQ[Dimensions[a] == Dimensions[b]]
Lie[l_, f_, x_] :=
With[{}, If[QDim[f, x] == True,
dl = Table[D[l, x[[i]]], {i, 1, Dimensions[x][[1]]}];
Sum[dl[[i]] f[[i]], {i, 1, Dimensions[x][[1]]}],
Print["Error: dimensional mismatch."]]]
DLie[l_, f_, x_, k_] :=

With[{}, For[i = 0; t = l, i < k, i++, t = Lie[t, f, x]]; t]

Another necessary function to be defined is a function that would calculate the relative degree of the nonlinear control system. This was quite easy as Mathematica has such a function:


RelativeDegree[f_, g_, h_, x_] := 
With[{}, sys = AffineStateSpaceModel[{f, g, {h}}, x];
r = SystemsModelVectorRelativeOrders[sys]]

Second step. What we ought to do now is define an invertible nonlinear coordinate transformation that satisfies the following conditions. If we call r the relative degree defined above,we must have:


phi_1 = DLie[h,f,x,0]


phi_2 = DLie[h,f,x,1]



...


phi_{r} = DLie[h,f,x,r-1]


As for phi_{k} with r < k <= n = Dimensions[x], these coordinate transformations must fulfill the following condition:


DLie[phi_{k},g,x,1]=0


In order that the transformation:


phi={phi_1, phi_2, ... , phi_n}


has a non-singular Jacobian.


How can I achieve this result? The main issues involve the fact that the condition for phi_{k} involves DSolve and thus I would have "constants" like C[1]. The point would then be to find C[1] such that phi has a non-singular Jacobian.


Example


h = x3;

f = {-x1, x1 x2, x2};
x = {x1, x2, x3};
g = {{Exp[x2]}, {1}, {0}};
r = RelativeDegree[f, g, h, x][[1]];

The first r elements of phi would be:


phir = Table[DLie[l, f, x, i], {i, 0, r - 1}];

As for the remaining n-r elements have to satisfy:


DLie[phi3[x], Flatten[g], x, 1]


This would correctly output:


Derivative[{0, 1, 0}][phi3][{x1, x2, x3}] + E^x2*Derivative[{1, 0, 0}][phi3][{x1, x2, x3}]

I would then attempt to solve this equation with DSolve. I should obtain something like this:


C[1][E^x2 - x1]

Yet I wouldn't know how to ask Mathematica to choose a C1 that satisfies the non-singularity of the Jacobian of phi.


A correct answer to this example is:


phi = {x3, x2, 1+x1-E^x2}


Answer



First find the desired transformation:


u[x1, x2, x3] /. 
DSolve[{D[u[x1, x2, x3], x1] Exp[x2] + D[u[x1, x2, x3], x2] == 0} ,
u[x1, x2, x3], {x1, x2, x3}][[1]]
trans = % /. C[1][x3] :> (1 - # &)

Then use StateSpaceTransform:


StateSpaceTransform[AffineStateSpaceModel[{f, g, h}, x], 
{Automatic, {z1 -> x3, z2 -> x2, z3 -> trans}}]



enter image description here



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...