Skip to main content

differential equations - Defining a non-linear coordinate transformation involving DSolve


This question is related to an other question I've asked yesterday here. Havin not received a reply, I believe there isn't a ready-made function for non-linear coordinate transformation in order to obtain a normal form of an affine state system as in nonlinear control theory. I wish to address here some of the problems in implementing such a function.


We would have the following non-linear control system:



x' = f(x) + g(x) u


y = h(x)


First step As is well explained in this book Isidori, what is firstly necessary is to define a nonlinear coordinate transformation. In order to do this, we ought to firstly define a Lie derivative. I've implemented the following code to do this:


QDim[a_, b_] := TrueQ[Dimensions[a] == Dimensions[b]]
Lie[l_, f_, x_] :=
With[{}, If[QDim[f, x] == True,
dl = Table[D[l, x[[i]]], {i, 1, Dimensions[x][[1]]}];
Sum[dl[[i]] f[[i]], {i, 1, Dimensions[x][[1]]}],
Print["Error: dimensional mismatch."]]]
DLie[l_, f_, x_, k_] :=

With[{}, For[i = 0; t = l, i < k, i++, t = Lie[t, f, x]]; t]

Another necessary function to be defined is a function that would calculate the relative degree of the nonlinear control system. This was quite easy as Mathematica has such a function:


RelativeDegree[f_, g_, h_, x_] := 
With[{}, sys = AffineStateSpaceModel[{f, g, {h}}, x];
r = SystemsModelVectorRelativeOrders[sys]]

Second step. What we ought to do now is define an invertible nonlinear coordinate transformation that satisfies the following conditions. If we call r the relative degree defined above,we must have:


phi_1 = DLie[h,f,x,0]


phi_2 = DLie[h,f,x,1]



...


phi_{r} = DLie[h,f,x,r-1]


As for phi_{k} with r < k <= n = Dimensions[x], these coordinate transformations must fulfill the following condition:


DLie[phi_{k},g,x,1]=0


In order that the transformation:


phi={phi_1, phi_2, ... , phi_n}


has a non-singular Jacobian.


How can I achieve this result? The main issues involve the fact that the condition for phi_{k} involves DSolve and thus I would have "constants" like C[1]. The point would then be to find C[1] such that phi has a non-singular Jacobian.


Example


h = x3;

f = {-x1, x1 x2, x2};
x = {x1, x2, x3};
g = {{Exp[x2]}, {1}, {0}};
r = RelativeDegree[f, g, h, x][[1]];

The first r elements of phi would be:


phir = Table[DLie[l, f, x, i], {i, 0, r - 1}];

As for the remaining n-r elements have to satisfy:


DLie[phi3[x], Flatten[g], x, 1]


This would correctly output:


Derivative[{0, 1, 0}][phi3][{x1, x2, x3}] + E^x2*Derivative[{1, 0, 0}][phi3][{x1, x2, x3}]

I would then attempt to solve this equation with DSolve. I should obtain something like this:


C[1][E^x2 - x1]

Yet I wouldn't know how to ask Mathematica to choose a C1 that satisfies the non-singularity of the Jacobian of phi.


A correct answer to this example is:


phi = {x3, x2, 1+x1-E^x2}


Answer



First find the desired transformation:


u[x1, x2, x3] /. 
DSolve[{D[u[x1, x2, x3], x1] Exp[x2] + D[u[x1, x2, x3], x2] == 0} ,
u[x1, x2, x3], {x1, x2, x3}][[1]]
trans = % /. C[1][x3] :> (1 - # &)

Then use StateSpaceTransform:


StateSpaceTransform[AffineStateSpaceModel[{f, g, h}, x], 
{Automatic, {z1 -> x3, z2 -> x2, z3 -> trans}}]



enter image description here



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.