Skip to main content

programming - How to leave function unevaluated programmatically?


Is it possible to write a function in such manner, that it can be either evaluated or left unevaluated?


This is a general question. Sample below is just a sample. No need to find solution for this sample. Need a general solution.


Hypothetical sample:



F[x_] := If[x>=0,
Sqrt[x],
Fail[]
];

So that it gives


F[4]
(* ==> 2 *)

But



F[-4]
(* ==> F[-4] *)

I.e. hypothetical function Fail[] stays for "drop evaluation and leave expression unevaluated".


I know I can use Condition


F[x_] := Sqrt[x] /; x >= 0

But I wish to do that in imperative programming way. Is this possible?


UPDATE


I don't understand why this is not working:



F[x_] := Block[{fail},
(If[x >= 0,
fail = False;
Sqrt[x],
fail = True
]) /; ! fail]

UPDATE 1


Manual has a good example


f[x_] := Module[{a}, a = Prime[10^x];

(FactorInteger[a + 1]) /; a < 10^6]

which is checking internal variables, not arguments. But why my version above not works then?



Answer



Your posted code does not work because some of the code you want to evaluate is given as an argument to Condition which holds its arguments, you could make it work by changing this


f[x_] := Block[{ans, success},
ans = If[x >= 0, success = 1; Sqrt[x], success = 0];
ans /; (success == 1)
]


Notice that the first line of code is process outside of Condition. It might be easier to see if you write it in expression form:


f[x_] := Block[{ans, success},
ans = If[x >= 0, success = 1; Sqrt[x], success = 0];
Condition[ans,success == 1]
]

Compare this with how your example would be in expression form:


 F[x_] := Block[{fail},
Condition[If[x >= 0,fail = False;Sqrt[x],fail = True], ! fail]]


You should be able to tell the difference. In the working code the code that sets fail is evaluated before Condition is evaluated. In your code, Condition is evaluated first, which holds the evaluation of the code. This is because condition has Attributes HoldAll.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...