Skip to main content

performance tuning - How to rapidly find the nearest pairs of points in different clusters


Background


For speed up this question or this question,I have such need.


Current try:


Suppose I have $3$ clusters of points:


list = {{{0, 0}, {.2, 0}}, {{2, 1}, {2, 2}, {2, 2.5}}, {{1.5, 
6}, {1.6, 7}, {1.4, 8}, {1.9, 10}}};
plot = ListPlot[list, Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotLegends ->Automatic,
FrameTicks -> None]



I want to find the closest pairs of points, each point in a different cluster. My current method:


Method one based on Tuples


tuplesMethod[list_] := 
First[MinimalBy[Tuples[#], EuclideanDistance @@ # &]] & /@
Subsets[list, {2}]

Method two based on Nearest


nearestMethod[list_] := 

Module[{f, var1, var2}, f = Nearest /@ Most[list];
var2 = Drop[list, #] & /@ Range[Length[list] - 1];
var1 = MapThread[Catenate /@ # /@ #2 &, {f, var2}];
Catenate[
Map[First[MinimalBy[#, EuclideanDistance @@ # &]] &,
Flatten[{var1, var2}, List /@ {2, 3, 4, 1, 5}], {2}]]]

Usage:


minDistPoints = tuplesMethod[list]



{{{0.2,0},{2,1}},{{0.2,0},{1.5,6}},{{2,2.5},{1.5,6}}}



Show it:


Show[plot, Epilog -> Line /@ minDistPoints]



But the current method is too slow, if clusters up to 10,the execution time will be cannot stand:


testPoint[n_] := (SeedRandom[2];

FindClusters[RandomReal[10 n, {20 n, 2}], n])

GeneralUtilities`BenchmarkPlot[{tuplesMethod,
nearestMethod}, testPoint, 2, TimeConstraint -> 50,
"IncludeFits" -> True]



Answer



The Nearest method should do well, but you need to make sure that it is only applied once for each cluster. Here is how I would code it. First a helper function, that finds the nearest members between one cluster and a list of other clusters:


icluster[i_, rest_]:=Module[{r, near,distances, rank,pos},

(* create a single list of other points *)
r = Catenate[rest];

(* apply NearestFunction to the list of other points *)
near = Nearest[i][r][[All, 1]];

(* compute distance squared between the nearest member and the other point *)
distances = Total[(near-r)^2, {2}];

(* rank the distances *)

rank = Ordering @ Ordering @ distances;

(* find the minimum rank for each cluster. Probably could be sped up *)
pos = Flatten @ Position[
rank,
Alternatives @@ Min /@ Internal`PartitionRagged[rank, Length/@rest]
];

(* extract near point and other points for minimum ranks *)
Transpose[{near[[pos]], r[[pos]]}]

]

We use this helper function to get the members of the clusters closest to each other:


nearestClusterMembers[list_] := Catenate @ Table[
icluster[list[[i]], list[[i+1 ;; -1]]],
{i, Length[list]-1}
]

For your simple example:


nearestClusterMembers[

{
{{0,0},{.2,0}},
{{2,1},{2,2},{2,2.5}},
{{1.5,6},{1.6,7},{1.4,8},{1.9,10}}
}
]


{{{0.2, 0}, {2, 1}}, {{0.2, 0}, {1.5, 6}}, {{2, 2.5}, {1.5, 6}}}




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...