Skip to main content

differential equations - Plotting separatrices for nonlinear system


Consider the system:


\begin{align*} x'&=(1-x-y)x\\ y'&=(4-7x-3y)y \end{align*}



The system has a saddle point at (1/4,3/4). How can I plot the separatrices on the phase portrait having domain $\{(x,y):\ 0\le x\le 1,\ 0\le y\le 2\}$?


Here is my attempt. Start with a vector plot.


Clear[x, y];
Clear[Derivative];
f[x_, y_] = (1 - x - y) x;
g[x_, y_] = (4 - 7 x - 3 y) y;
vp = VectorPlot[{f[x, y], g[x, y]}, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 2},
VectorScale -> {0.045, 0.5, None},
VectorStyle -> {GrayLevel[0.8]},
VectorPoints -> 16,

Axes -> True, AxesLabel -> {x, y}];

Get the equilibrium points.


eqpts = Solve[{f[x, y] == 0, g[x, y] == 0}, {x, y}]

There is a saddle point at (1/4,3/4). Set an eps value.


eps=1/10000;

Define a function.


sol[{x0_, y0_, tmin_, tmax_}] := 

NDSolveValue[{x'[t] == f[x[t], y[t]], y'[t] == g[x[t], y[t]],
x[0] == x0, y[0] == y0}, {x[t], y[t]}, {t, tmin, tmax}]

Spend time (brute force) adjusting arguments to sol function to plot the separatrices.


sep1 = ParametricPlot[
Evaluate@sol[{1/4 + eps, 3/4, 0, 40}], {t, 0, 40},
PlotStyle -> {Red, Thick}];
sep2 = ParametricPlot[
Evaluate@sol[{1/4 - eps, 3/4, 0, 40}], {t, 0, 40},
PlotStyle -> {Red, Thick}];

sep3 = ParametricPlot[
Evaluate@sol[{1/4 + eps, 3/4 + eps, -2.8, 0}], {t, -2.8, 0},
PlotStyle -> {Red, Thick}];
sep4 = ParametricPlot[
Evaluate@sol[{1/4 - eps, 3/4 - eps, -40, 0}], {t, -40, 0},
PlotStyle -> {Red, Thick}];

Show everything together.


Show[vp, Graphics[{Black, PointSize[Large], 
Point[{x, y}] /. eqpts}], sep1, sep2, sep3, sep4]


Result:


enter image description here


Which worked. Just wondering if there would be a simpler approach, one that beginning students can easily understand.


P.S. All code pasted below for an easy copy and paste.


Clear[x, y];
Clear[Derivative];
f[x_, y_] = (1 - x - y) x;
g[x_, y_] = (4 - 7 x - 3 y) y;
vp = VectorPlot[{f[x, y], g[x, y]}, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 2},

VectorScale -> {0.045, 0.5, None},
VectorStyle -> {GrayLevel[0.8]},
VectorPoints -> 16,
Axes -> True, AxesLabel -> {x, y}];
eqpts = Solve[{f[x, y] == 0, g[x, y] == 0}, {x, y}];
eps = 1/10000;
sol[{x0_, y0_, tmin_, tmax_}] :=
NDSolveValue[{x'[t] == f[x[t], y[t]], y'[t] == g[x[t], y[t]],
x[0] == x0, y[0] == y0}, {x[t], y[t]}, {t, tmin, tmax}];
sep1 = ParametricPlot[

Evaluate@sol[{1/4 + eps, 3/4, 0, 40}], {t, 0, 40},
PlotStyle -> {Red, Thick}];
sep2 = ParametricPlot[
Evaluate@sol[{1/4 - eps, 3/4, 0, 40}], {t, 0, 40},
PlotStyle -> {Red, Thick}];
sep3 = ParametricPlot[
Evaluate@sol[{1/4 + eps, 3/4 + eps, -2.8, 0}], {t, -2.8, 0},
PlotStyle -> {Red, Thick}];
sep4 = ParametricPlot[
Evaluate@sol[{1/4 - eps, 3/4 - eps, -40, 0}], {t, -40, 0},

PlotStyle -> {Red, Thick}];
Show[vp, Graphics[{Black, PointSize[Large],
Point[{x, y}] /. eqpts}], sep1, sep2, sep3, sep4]

Answer



We can solve (approximately) for the initial conditions of solutions that approach an equilbrium by comparing the displacement vector from the equilibrium with the vector field of the ODE. Such trajectory is characterized by the condition that these two vectors become parallel as the solution nears the equilibrium. I used a similar idea before, which is buried in this answer.


sys = {(1 - x - y) x, (4 - 7 x - 3 y) y};
vars = {x, y};
equilibria = Solve[sys == {0, 0}, vars, Reals]
(* {{x -> 0, y -> 4/3}, {x -> 1/4, y -> 3/4}, {x -> 1, y -> 0}, {x -> 0, y -> 0}} *)


saddles = Pick[equilibria, Sign@Det@D[sys, {vars}] /. equilibria, -1]
(* {{x -> 1/4, y -> 3/4}} *)

Here is a function to get initial conditions for the separatrices.


sepICS[p0_, eps_] := With[{p1 = p0 + eps * Norm[p0] {Cos[t], Sin[t]}},
p1 /. NSolve[Det[{p1 - p0, sys /. Thread[vars -> p1]}] == 0 && 0 <= t < 2 Pi]
];

We get parametrizations for the separatrices, stopping the integration when the solution gets close to the saddle and when it leaves the plot domain. One problem with approaching a saddle point is that the initial condition, as well as the subsequent integration, is approximate. If the solution is pushed too far, it will ricochet off along another separatrix (approximately).


separatrices = Flatten[

Module[{eps = 10^-7, (* tunable distance from equilibrium *)
X0, dX},
With[{Xa = 0, Xb = 1, Yc = 0, Yd = 2, (* plot domain boundaries *)
p0 = vars /. #, (* equilibrium *)
X = Through[vars[t]]}, (* variables at t *)
X0 = X /. t -> 0; (* initial values *)
dX = D[X, t]; (* derivatives *)
With[{X1 = X[[1]], X2 = X[[2]]},
First@NDSolve[{
dX == (sys /. v : Alternatives @@ vars :> v[t]),

X0 == #,
(*stop when close to saddle*)
WhenEvent[Norm[X - p0] < 0.5 eps * Norm[p0], "StopIntegration"],
(*stop when solution leaves plot domain*)
WhenEvent[Abs[X1 - (Xa + Xb)/2] > (Xb - Xa)/2, "StopIntegration"],
WhenEvent[Abs[X2 - (Yc + Yd)/2] > (Yd - Yc)/2, "StopIntegration"]},
vars, {t, -100, 100}] & /@ sepICS[p0, eps]
]] & /@ saddles
],
1];



sepPlots = ParametricPlot @@@ ({{x[t], y[t]},
Hold[Flatten][{t, x["Domain"]}]} /. separatrices // ReleaseHold);

Show[
background,
vp,
sepPlots,
PlotRange -> All, Frame -> True, Axes -> False, AspectRatio -> 1]


Mathematica graphics


The background is some attempt at mimicking ubpqdn's. One can use the lines from the plots of the separatrices to construct poiygon's to illustrate the regions created by them. It is a bit awkward to add the corner points.


sepLines = First@Cases[#, _Line, Infinity] & /@ sepPlots;
background = Graphics[
Riffle[
Lighter[#, 0.6] & /@ {Red, Purple, Yellow, Green},
MapAt[Reverse,
Partition[sepLines, 2, 1, 1], {{2}, {4}}] /. {Line[p1_],
Line[p2_]} :> Polygon[

Join[p1, p2,
Nearest[Tuples[{{0, 1}, {0, 2}}], {p2[[-1, 1]], p1[[1, 2]]}, {1, 0.01}],
Nearest[Tuples[{{0, 1}, {0, 2}}], {p1[[1, 1]], p2[[-1, 2]]}, {1, 0.01}]]]
],
PlotRange -> All, Frame -> True, Axes -> False, AspectRatio -> 1
]



Addendum: Notes on the code.


1. v : x | y :> v[t]: The : is short for Pattern; | is short for Alternatives. So v : x | y defines the pattern symbol v to represent x or y. The whole v : x | y :> v[t], means replace x or y by x[t] or y[t] respectively. The rules {x -> x[t], y -> y[t]} are equivalent.



2. ParametricPlot @@@ ...: The main problem here are the domains of the solutions. The variable separatrices contains a list of solutions of the form


{{x -> x1ifn, y -> y1ifn}, {x -> x2ifn, y -> y2ifn},...}

where x1ifn, y1ifn etc. are interpolating functions. Each pair x1ifn, y1ifn has the same domain, but another pair x2ifn, y2ifn will have a different domain. So what is an easy way to plot all of the solutions? If ifn is an InterpolatingFunction, then ifn["Domain"] returns a list of domains for each input; in this case, it will have the form {{tmin, tmax}}. Flatten[{t, x["Domain"]}] will have the form {t, tmin, tmax} as needed for ParametricPlot. The problem is that the x in x["Domain"] has to be replaced by an InterpolatingFunction and evaluated before Flatten is evaluated. Hence the Hold[Flatten], to prevent flattening until after the /. separatrices has been executed; the ReleaseHold then lets the domains be evaluated and flattened. Since separatrices is a list of solutions (each of which is a list of Rules), the replacement yields a list of the form:


{{{x1ifn[t], y1ifn[t]}, Hold[Flatten][{t, {{tmin1, tmax1}}}]},
{{x2ifn[t], y2ifn[t]}, Hold[Flatten][{t, {{tmin2, tmax2}}}]},
...}

After ReleaseHold, these elements will be ready to have ParametricPlot applied to them with @@@. This replaces the {} around each element with ParametricPlot[]:


{ParametricPlot[{x1ifn[t], y1ifn[t]}, {t, tmin1, tmax1}],

ParametricPlot[{x2ifn[t], y2ifn[t]}, {t, tmin2, tmax2}],
...}

These automatically evaluate to the plots of each separatrix.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...