plotting - New behavior of PlotRange in Mathematica 10

In Mathematica 10, when I plot data that has small changes around some non-zero value, the plot chooses a PlotRange that "collapses" the data so that the variations cannot be seen. The only way I can find to reproduce the results seen in prior versions is to manually set the PlotRange. Is this a bug? Is there a way to redefine the function that computes PlotRange?

Here is a simple example of the problem I have.

dat = {{7.36107564302725094634299*^-8,6.49517319445169858694755},   
       {1.872486493499905555253878*^-7,6.495173287782000920228519}, 
       {3.295280057690389061023151*^-7,6.495173324963207553515714},
       {4.742955045429201620632748*^-7,6.495173299191079237788739}, 

       {5.950099990519129421821797*^-7,6.495173215270764724855183},
       {6.695807917858125246686823*^-7,6.495173088580509534386944}, 
       {6.843647194344045088159516*^-7,6.495172942307050194820725}};

ylim = {Min[#], Max[#]} &[#[[2]] & /@ dat]

ListLinePlot[dat, PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here

ListLinePlot[dat, PlotRange -> {All, ylim}]

enter image description here

In Mathematica version 9

ListLinePlot[dat, PlotRange -> All]

Answer

After some spelunking it appears I have an answer and solution: the behavior is as intended, and it is controlled by a Method option "AllowMicroRanges".

ListLinePlot[dat,
  PlotRange -> Full,  

  Method -> {"AllowMicroRanges" -> #}
] & /@ {True, False}

enter image description here

It seems this option may also be given directly, outside of Method, but if you wish to control the default for this option without setting an overall Method you must set it for System`ProtoPlotDump`iListPlot or you get a "... is not a known option for ListLinePlot" message.

SetOptions[System`ProtoPlotDump`iListPlot, "AllowMicroRanges" -> True]

Comments

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.

Blog

Search This Blog