Skip to main content

Higher-order, nonlinear differential equation with Initial Values


I tried to solve for an non-Hookean spring's motion, but the output from Mathematica is weird. It seems that there is inverse functions involved.


DSolve[{x''[t] + x[t]^3 == 0}, x[t], t]
Solve::ifun: Inverse functions are being used by Solve, so some solutions may not be found; use Reduce for complete solution information. >>
Out[1] = {{x[t] -> -I 2^(1/4) Sqrt[-(1/Sqrt[C[1]])] Sqrt[C[1]]
JacobiSN[Sqrt[
Sqrt[2] t^2 Sqrt[C[1]] + 2 Sqrt[2] t Sqrt[C[1]] C[2] +
Sqrt[2] Sqrt[C[1]] C[2]^2]/Sqrt[2], -1]}, {x[t] -> I 2^(1/4) Sqrt[-(1/Sqrt[C[1]])] Sqrt[C[1]] JacobiSN[Sqrt[Sqrt[2] t^2 Sqrt[C[1]] + 2 Sqrt[2] t Sqrt[C[1]] C[2] +

Sqrt[2] Sqrt[C[1]] C[2]^2]/Sqrt[2], -1]}}

If you try Reduce, Mathematica will then give you no output at all, which makes sense because the output is not an equality or inequality.


Also, I added initial values into DSolve, but I'm unable to obtain the answer.


In[1]:= DSolve[{x''[t] + x[t]^3 == 0, x[0] == d, x'[0] == 0}, x[t], t]
Solve::ifun: Inverse functions are being used by Solve, so some solutions may not be found; use Reduce for complete solution information. >>
DSolve::bvfail: For some branches of the general solution, unable to solve the conditions. >>
DSolve::bvfail: For some branches of the general solution, unable to solve the conditions. >>
Out[1]= {}

Answer




Well, that was easy:


Block[{Simplify = FullSimplify},
DSolve[{x''[t] + x[t]^3 == 0, x'[0] == 0, x[0] == x0}, x[t], t]
] // FullSimplify
(*
{{x[t] -> x0 JacobiCD[(t x0)/Sqrt[2], -1]}}
*)

DSolve uses Simplify to check the solution, and Simplify is not up to the task. So I used Block to replace it with FullSimplify, which will reduce the DE to True after DSolve substitutes the solution. Perhaps the Method option could be used, but there are no clues to how to use it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.