Skip to main content

cluster analysis - Finding connected components in an array


I have an $w\times h$ array with non-negative integers.


I wish to partition the set of coordinates $(c,r)$ with $1\leq c \leq w$ and $1\leq r \leq h$, in subsets, so that each subset corresponds to a cluster of the same value in the array.


Two coordinates are neighbouring if they either are on top of another, or one is down-left of the other. This corresponds to finding clusters in a parallelogram.


belisarius was nice to provide a picture:


enter image description here


I have some code to find one connected cluster in an array (I call it gt):


FloodFillExtractTile[gt_, {sr_, sc_}] := 
Module[{r, c, toExplore, visited = {}},
toExplore = {{sr, sc}};

While[Length@toExplore > 0,
(* Pop *)
{r, c} = Last@toExplore;
toExplore = Most[toExplore];
AppendTo[visited, {r, c}];
(* Down-left *)

If[c > 1 && r < h &&
gt[[r + 1, c - 1]] == gt[[r, c]] && !
MemberQ[visited, {r + 1, c - 1}],

AppendTo[toExplore, {r + 1, c - 1}];
];
(* Down-right *)

If[ r < h &&
gt[[r + 1, c]] == gt[[r, c]] && ! MemberQ[visited, {r + 1, c}],
AppendTo[toExplore, {r + 1, c}];
];
(* Up-right *)


If[r > 1 && c < w &&
gt[[r - 1, c + 1]] == gt[[r, c]] && !
MemberQ[visited, {r - 1, c + 1}],
AppendTo[toExplore, {r - 1, c + 1}];
];
(* Up-left *)

If[ r > 1 &&
gt[[r - 1, c]] == gt[[r, c]] && ! MemberQ[visited, {r - 1, c}],
AppendTo[toExplore, {r - 1, c}];

];
];
Return@visited;
];

Then FloodFillExtractTile[gtp, {1, 1}] gives the component connected to the upper left hand corner. However, this method feels ugly, and extending it to all components feels even uglier.


I was looking at Gather, but the problem is that it wants all points in a cluster to be equal, see for example Gather dependency on list order?


Edit: So this is the type of arrays I am looking at. The $6$, the $3$'s, the $2$'s and the $0$'s are in one component respectively, but there are two components with $1$'s.


Being neighbours means being adjacent down-left, down-right, up-left and up-right.


Now, the rows is stored just like regular rows in a rectangular matrix, so that is why this translates to a bit strange criteria for being neighbours. GT-pattern



This is the best code I have so far, first extract points with the same value, then do connected-component analysis on those parts.


GetGTTiles[gtp_] := 
Module[{testSame, testEdge, h, w, pts, sameClusters, getEdges,
tiles},
{h, w} = Dimensions[gtp];
pts = Join @@ Table[{r, c}, {r, h}, {c, w}];
testSame[{r1_, c1_}, {r2_, c2_}] := (gtp[[r1, c1]] ==
gtp[[r2, c2]]);
testEdge[{r1_, c1_}, {r2_,
c2_}] := (gtp[[r1, c1]] ==

gtp[[r2, c2]]) &&
((c1 == c2 &&
Abs[r1 - r2] <= 1) || (c1 == c2 - 1 &&
r1 == r2 + 1) || (c1 == c2 + 1 && r1 == r2 - 1));
sameClusters = Gather[pts, testSame];
getEdges[clust_] :=
Join @@ Outer[If[testEdge[#1, #2], #1 -> #2, Sequence @@ {}] &,
clust, clust, 1];
tiles =
Join @@ (ConnectedComponents[Graph@getEdges[#]] & /@ sameClusters);

Return@tiles;
];

This is the output I expect for the example given (5 clusters found):


{{{1, 1}}, {{1, 2}, {2, 1}}, 
{{1, 3}, {2, 3}, {3, 2}, {4, 1}, {3, 1}, {2, 2}},
{{1, 4}},
{{2, 4}, {3, 4}, {4, 4}, {5, 4}, {5, 3}, {4,3}},
{{3, 3}, {4, 2}, {5, 2}, {5, 1}}}


EDIT: So this is the final code, based on belisarius solution:


GTTiles[gtp_List] := Module[{fromEuclidean, toEuclidean,
getOneTile, elements, elmPos, pts, tile, tiles},

(* This is used to changefrom different coordinate systems. *)

fromEuclidean[{r_, c_}] := {r, (c - r)/2 + 1};
toEuclidean[{r_, c_}] := {r, 2 c + r - 2};

getOneTile[pts_List, maxDist_?NumericQ] := Module[{f},

f = Nearest[pts];
FixedPoint[
Union@Flatten[f[#, {Infinity, maxDist}] & /@ #, 1] &, {First@
pts}]];

elements = Union @@ gtp;
elmPos = (toEuclidean /@ Position[gtp, #]) & /@ elements;
(* This is really strange code. *)
tiles = Flatten[Flatten[
Reap[NestWhile[Complement[#,

Sow@getOneTile[#, N@Sqrt@2]] &, #, # != {} &]][[2]],
1] & /@ elmPos, 1];
tiles = Map[fromEuclidean, tiles, {2}];
Return@tiles;
];

Answer



l1 = {{6, 3, 2, 1}, {3, 2, 2, 0}, {2, 2, 1, 0}, {2, 1, 0, 0}, {1, 1, 0, 0}};
l = Riffle[#, ""] & /@ l1;
els = Union @@ l;
par = MapIndexed[PadRight[PadLeft[#1, #2[[1]] + Length@#1 - 1, ""],

Length@l + Length@#1 - 1, ""] &, l];
eachElm = Position[par, #] & /@ els;
getOneCluster[pts_List, maxDist_?NumericQ] :=
Module[{f},
f = Nearest[pts];
FixedPoint[Union@Flatten[f[#, {Infinity, maxDist}] & /@ #, 1] &, {First@pts}]];
clusters =
Flatten[Flatten[
Reap[NestWhile[
Complement[#,

Sow@getOneCluster[#, N@Sqrt@2]] &, #, # != {} &]][[2]], 1] & /@ eachElm, 1];
Grid[par,
ItemStyle -> {Automatic, Automatic, Flatten@MapIndexed[#1 -> Hue[#2[[1]]/3] &,
clusters, {2}]}]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...