Skip to main content

differential equations - FEM Solution desired for "Plate with orifice" deflection: Application of Boundary Conditions and use of Regions


I found the deflection of an orifice plate (circular plate with a hole) subject to uniform pressure using Mathematica's NDSolve functionality. The plate is fixed at its outer circumference and is free at its inner circumference (hole).


The orifice plate (domain: $\Omega$ for NDSolve) is shown (all dimensions are meter): enter image description here


The deflection of the plate follows closely the assumption of ``small strains''. The deflection can be easily found by solving the biharmonic equation (with only radial terms; assuming no change in $\theta$ component of deflection and neglccting $z$ variation because of small thickness) with "fixed" boundary conditions on the outer circumference and "free" boundary conditions (for shear force and moment in terms of deflection) on the inner hole circumference. In fact my solution matches tabulated values for deflections of.


My solution method is shown below


a = 10*10^-3;

b = 5*10^-3;
ν = 1/3;
p0 = 0.1*10^6;
Ey = 200 *10^9;
h = 1*10^-3;
De = (Ey h^3)/(12 (1 - ν^2));

sol = NDSolve[
{
w''''[r] + (2/r) w'''[r] - (1/(r^2)) w''[r] + (1/(r^3)) w'[

r] == -p0/De,
w[a] == 0,
w'[a] == 0,
-(Derivative[1][w][b]/b^2) + Derivative[2][w][b]/b +
Derivative[3][w][b] == 0,
(ν Derivative[1][w][b])/b + Derivative[2][w][b] == 0
},
w, {r, b, a}]

Plotting is done



Plot[Evaluate[w[r] /. sol], {r, b, a}, 
PlotRange -> {{0, a}, Automatic},
BaseStyle -> {FontWeight -> "Bold", FontSize -> 18},
AxesLabel -> {"Radial location [m]", "Transverse deflection [m]"},
PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}, ImageSize -> 800]

The radial deflection of the plate is plotted and matches very closely, tabulated data from the "Mechanical engineer's handbook by James Carvill" (data table is available on request if needed)


enter image description here



My question is, how do I assign boundary conditions in the form of DirichletCondition and NeumannValue etc.




I would really like to solve the biharmonic equation in $r$ on an axisymmetric domain of my choosing and plot the deflection. This would need proper application of boundary conditions for the domain boundaries that I have not been able to do. I would like to use a domain as specified by a region difference. the idea is to plot the deflections on the domain to show the utility of FEM to solve such problems. An example would be Stokes flow solved using FEM in Mathematica.


My attempt so far is to do the following:


Needs["DifferentialEquations`InterpolatingFunctionAnatomy`"]
Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
a = 10*10^-3;
b = 2*10^-3;
ν = 1/3;
p0 = 0.1*10^6;
Ey = 200 *10^9;

h = 1*10^-3;
De = (Ey h^3)/(12 (1 - ν^2));
Ω = RegionDifference[Disk[{0, 0}, a], Disk[{0, 0}, b]];
RegionPlot[Ω, AspectRatio -> Automatic,
ImageSize -> 400, LabelStyle -> {24, GrayLevel[0]}]

Boundary conditions (How do I correctly obtain the second and third conditions, viz., $c_3, c_4$)


Subscript[Γ, d1] = DirichletCondition[0, r == a]
Subscript[Γ, n1] = NeumannValue[0, r == a]
Subscript[c, 3] = -(Derivative[1][w][b]/b^2) + (w^′′)[

b]/b +
\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(w\),
TagBox[
RowBox[{"(", "3", ")"}],
Derivative],
MultilineFunction->None]\)[b]
Subscript[c, 4] = (ν Derivative[1][w][b])/
b + (w^′′)[b]

Application of Boundary conditions in NDSolve for my domain $\Omega$ (UNABLE TO ACCOMPLISH THIS)



sol = NDSolve[
{
w''''[r] + (2/r) w'''[r] - (1/(r^2)) w''[r] + (1/(r^3)) w'[
r] == -p0/De,
Subscript[Γ, d1] == 0,
Subscript[Γ, n1] == 0,
-(Derivative[1][w][b]/b^2) + Derivative[2][w][b]/b +
Derivative[3][w][b] == 0,
(ν Derivative[1][w][b])/b + Derivative[2][w][b] == 0
},

w, r ∈ Ω,
Method -> {"FiniteElement", "InterpolationOrder" -> 2,
"MeshOptions" -> {"MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.5,
"MaxBoundaryCellMeasure" -> 0.02}}
]

The FEM parameters chosen in NDSolve are not very well thought of currently and I am open to suggestions.



Answer



Here is something to get you started: The idea is to use a 2D cross section of the orifice plate in the xz-direction (not the xy-direction, as then you could not apply the surface force).


a = 10*10^-3;

b = 5*10^-3;
ν = 1/3;
p0 = 0.1*10^6;
Ey = 200*10^9;
h = 1*10^-3;
De = (Ey h^3)/(12 (1 - ν^2));

planeStrain = {Inactive[Div][{{0, -((Ey*ν)/((1 - 2*ν)*(1 + ν)))},
{-Ey/(2*(1 + ν)), 0}} . Inactive[Grad][v[x, y],
{x, y}], {x, y}] + Inactive[Div][

{{-((Ey*(1 - ν))/((1 - 2*ν)*(1 + ν))), 0},
{0, -Ey/(2*(1 + ν))}} . Inactive[Grad][u[x, y],
{x, y}], {x, y}],
Inactive[Div][{{0, -Ey/(2*(1 + ν))},
{-((Ey*ν)/((1 - 2*ν)*(1 + ν))), 0}} .
Inactive[Grad][u[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}] +
Inactive[Div][{{-Ey/(2*(1 + ν)), 0},
{0, -((Ey*(1 - ν))/((1 - 2*ν)*(1 + ν)))}} .
Inactive[Grad][v[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}]}/. {Y -> Ey};


r = Rectangle[{b, 0}, {a, h}];
Subscript[Γ,
D] = {DirichletCondition[{u[x, y] == 0., v[x, y] == 0.}, x == a]};
{uif, vif} =
NDSolveValue[{planeStrain == {0, NeumannValue[-p0/De, y == h]},
Subscript[Γ, D]}, {u, v}, {x, y} ∈ r];
mesh = uif["ElementMesh"];
Show[{
mesh["Wireframe"[ "MeshElement" -> "BoundaryElements"]],
ElementMeshDeformation[mesh, {uif, vif}, "ScalingFactor" -> 10^5][

"Wireframe"[
"ElementMeshDirective" -> Directive[EdgeForm[Red], FaceForm[]]]]}]

enter image description here


And the deformation at h/2 in the y-direction:


Plot[vif[x, h/2], {x, b, a}]

enter image description here


There is a scaling issue, I'll leave that to you to figure out. perhaps some factor is missing or the plane strain model is not quite right in this scenario. But in principal that's how you'd do it. Or, if you want to go and get the hammer you could do it in 3D with a stress operator (and that should give the correct answer with more thinking)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.