Skip to main content

custom notation - How to re-parse (or re-map) character '.' to user-defined function


The default behavior of the character . between two non-numeric characters is to be interpreted as the infix of the Mathematica function Dot.


Is there a command that can be placed in a package to get the front-end to parse . as an infix for another function -- say user-defined one, myDot[]?


That is,




  1. a.b should be interpreted as myDot[a, b]





  2. myDot[a.b] should map to a.b




  3. Dot[a,b] should not get mapped to a.b, but the functionality of the built-in function Dot should not be lost.




  4. 3.14 should remain a single number, where here the dot indicates a decimal separator.






Answer



Updated


First, let's stop Dot from creating these box structures.


MakeBoxes[Dot[x__], form_] := 
RowBox[{"Dot", "[", RowBox@Riffle[MakeBoxes /@ {x}, ","], "]"}]

Next, let's specify that these structures should instead be interpreted as myDot:


MakeExpression[RowBox@(row : {PatternSequence[_, "."] .., _}), form_] := 
MakeExpression[
RowBox@{"myDot", "[", RowBox@Riffle[row[[1 ;; -1 ;; 2]], ","], "]"}, form]


The slicing and riffling is ugly... there is probably a cleaner way to do it. ReplacePart seemed to be doing weird things when I tried it but I didn't spend any time on it.


The last step is to specify that myDot should also be rendered into the same structure:


MakeBoxes[myDot[x__], form_] := RowBox@Riffle[MakeBoxes /@ {x}, "."]

Now,


Dot[a, b, c]


Dot[a, b, c]




Dot[{a, b, c}, {x, y, z}]


a x + b y + c z



a.b.c


a.b.c




a.b.c // FullForm


myDot[a, b, c]



{a, b, c}.{x, y, z} // InputForm


myDot[{a, b, c}, {x, y, z}]




a.(b^2).c


a.b2.c



% // InputForm


myDot[a, b^2, c]




In all cases you will have to use MakeExpression to override the interpretation of user input, but you may also find TagBox and InterpretationBox interesting alternatives to the MakeBoxes implementations above.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.