Skip to main content

plotting - ListContourPlot interpolation screws up on concave set of data


I want to create ListContourPlots for sets of Data (from a physics simulation) given as Triplets {x, y, f(x, y)}. Certain parameter regions in the x-y-plane are excluded by experiments. The list of triplets simply does not contain any Triplets with excluded x-y-parameters. ListPointPlot3D shows that this is not the problem.



The problem is that ListContourPlot (which I prefer to use, since I have to correlate exclusions from different quantities) interpolates values into regions where no data points are given, as soon as the shape of the data-filled region becomes concave.


I already tried creating a list that is only defined in the excluded regions and painting it over the original plot, however, my dataset is not entirely concave, so that overpainting will cut off some of the interesting parts of the plot...


I figure it has something to do with the "Method" option of ListContourPlot, but those things are really badly documented.


Here is a list of 140 data triplets that show the problem.


l= {{14., 2.1, 125.433}, {14., 2.1375, 125.957}, {14., 2.175, 
  126.58}, {14., 2.2125, 127.354}, {14., 2.25, 128.415}, {14.5, 
  2.1125, 125.698}, {14.5, 2.15, 126.315}, {14.5, 2.1875, 
  127.087}, {14.5, 2.225, 128.152}, {15., 2.1, 125.593}, {15., 2.1375,
   126.238}, {15., 2.175, 127.061}, {15., 2.2125, 128.256}, {15.5, 
  2.1125, 125.886}, {15.5, 2.15, 126.669}, {15.5, 2.1875, 

  127.783}, {16., 2.1, 125.73}, {16., 2.1375, 126.534}, {16., 2.175, 
  127.708}, {16.5, 2.1125, 126.054}, {16.5, 2.15, 127.082}, {17., 2.1,
   125.829}, {17., 2.1375, 126.85}, {17.5, 2.1, 125.858}, {17.5, 
  2.1375, 127.016}, {18., 2.1, 125.868}, {18., 2.1375, 
  127.185}, {18.5, 2.1125, 126.243}, {18.5, 2.15, 128.277}, {19., 
  2.125, 126.76}, {19.5, 2.1125, 126.183}, {20., 2.1, 125.633}, {20., 
  2.1375, 127.686}, {20.5, 2.125, 126.573}, {21., 2.1125, 
  125.763}, {21.5, 2.1, 125.093}, {21.5, 2.1375, 127.062}, {22., 
  2.125, 125.806}, {22.5, 2.1125, 124.979}, {22.5, 2.15, 
  127.707}, {23., 2.125, 125.111}, {23.5, 2.1, 124.03}, {23.5, 2.1375,

   125.248}, {24., 2.1, 123.738}, {24., 2.1375, 124.82}, {24.5, 2.1, 
  123.445}, {24.5, 2.1375, 124.411}, {24.5, 2.175, 126.896}, {25., 
  2.125, 123.689}, {25., 2.1625, 124.924}, {25.5, 2.1125, 
  123.092}, {25.5, 2.15, 123.987}, {25.5, 2.1875, 125.801}, {26., 
  2.125, 123.022}, {26., 2.1625, 123.937}, {26., 2.2, 125.892}, {26.5,
   2.125, 122.703}, {26.5, 2.1625, 123.512}, {26.5, 2.2, 
  124.901}, {27., 2.1125, 122.198}, {27., 2.15, 122.848}, {27., 
  2.1875, 123.782}, {27., 2.225, 125.874}, {27.5, 2.125, 
  122.095}, {27.5, 2.1625, 122.745}, {27.5, 2.2, 123.676}, {27.5, 
  2.2375, 125.734}, {28., 2.125, 121.808}, {28., 2.1625, 

  122.394}, {28., 2.2, 123.198}, {28., 2.2375, 124.563}, {28.5, 
  2.1125, 121.39}, {28.5, 2.15, 121.87}, {28.5, 2.1875, 
  122.506}, {28.5, 2.225, 123.412}, {28.5, 2.2625, 125.253}, {29., 
  2.125, 121.29}, {29., 2.1625, 121.747}, {29., 2.2, 122.372}, {29., 
  2.2375, 123.256}, {29., 2.275, 124.961}, {29.5, 2.125, 
  121.036}, {29.5, 2.1625, 121.454}, {29.5, 2.2, 122.006}, {29.5, 
  2.2375, 122.762}, {29.5, 2.275, 123.966}, {30., 2.1, 120.465}, {30.,
   2.1375, 120.896}, {30., 2.175, 121.334}, {30., 2.2125, 
  121.862}, {30., 2.25, 122.595}, {30., 2.2875, 123.735}, {30.5, 2.1, 
  120.187}, {30.5, 2.1375, 120.599}, {30.5, 2.175, 121.065}, {30.5, 

  2.2125, 121.525}, {30.5, 2.25, 122.157}, {30.5, 2.2875, 
  123.07}, {30.5, 2.325, 124.9}, {31., 2.125, 120.167}, {31., 2.1625, 
  120.593}, {31., 2.2, 121.078}, {31., 2.2375, 121.561}, {31., 2.275, 
  122.237}, {31., 2.3125, 123.247}, {31., 2.35, 126.014}, {31.5, 
  2.125, 119.881}, {31.5, 2.1625, 120.285}, {31.5, 2.2, 
  120.747}, {31.5, 2.2375, 121.268}, {31.5, 2.275, 121.808}, {31.5, 
  2.3125, 122.628}, {31.5, 2.35, 124.034}, {32., 2.1125, 
  119.484}, {32., 2.15, 119.849}, {32., 2.1875, 120.264}, {32., 2.225,
   120.742}, {32., 2.2625, 121.268}, {32., 2.3, 121.85}, {32., 2.3375,
   122.72}, {32.5, 2.1125, 119.213}, {32.5, 2.15, 119.558}, {32.5, 

  2.1875, 119.949}, {32.5, 2.225, 120.396}, {32.5, 2.2625, 
  120.911}, {32.5, 2.3, 121.431}, {33., 2.1, 118.846}, {33., 2.1375, 
  119.16}, {33., 2.175, 119.512}, {33., 2.2125, 119.91}, {33., 2.25, 
  120.365}, {33., 2.2875, 120.871}, {33.5, 2.125, 118.783}, {33.5, 
  2.1625, 119.101}, {33.5, 2.2, 119.458}, {33.5, 2.2375, 
  119.856}, {34., 2.1, 118.333}, {34., 2.1375, 118.614}, {34., 2.175, 
  118.923}, {34., 2.2125, 119.261}};

ListPlot@l[[All, 1 ;; 2]]


Mathematica graphics



Answer



f = Interpolation[l3= (Last /@ Sort /@ GatherBy[l[[All, 1 ;; 2]], #[[1]] &])]
ListContourPlot[l, RegionFunction -> (#2 < f[#1] &)]

Mathematica graphics


Edit


If you want a smoother curve, you could use for example whuber's method here for getting something similar to an "envolvent" curve:


l4 = {(#[[1]] - 14) 2 + 1, #[[2]]} & /@ l3;
nrow = 32;

i = Image[SparseArray[Flatten[Table[{i, IntegerPart@#1} -> #2, {i, 1, nrow}] & @@@ l4]]] 
                                                                                   // ImageAdjust

Mathematica graphics


{minima, maxima} = Flatten[Position[First[ImageData[#[i]]], 1]] & /@ {MinDetect, MaxDetect};

f1 = Interpolation[N@{(#[[1]] - 1)/2 + 14, #[[2]]} & /@ l4[[maxima]], InterpolationOrder -> 1]

f2[x_] = Max[f[x], f1[x]]


The "envolvent":


Quiet@Show[ListLinePlot@l3, Plot[f2[x], {x, 14, 34}]]

Mathematica graphics


Quiet@ListContourPlot[l, RegionFunction -> (#2 < f2[#1] &)]

Mathematica graphics


Quiet@ListPlot3D[l, RegionFunction -> (#2 < f2[#1] &), 
                 ColorFunction -> "SouthwestColors", MeshFunctions -> {#3 &}]


Mathematica graphics


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more