Skip to main content

plotting - Computing launch parameters for hitting a point in 3D with projectile under influence of wind


The end goal of this problem is to compute functions which describe the launch parameters which are needed to hit a specified goal in 3D in the presence of wind disturbances. This is as far I have come ($\theta$ and $\varphi$ are variables from the spherical coordinate system):


g = 9.81;
m = 10;
rho = 1.225;
Cd = 0.5;
A = 0.1;
theta = 45 Degree;(*0-180 degrees*)

phi = 45 Degree;(*0-360 degrees*)
v = 35;(*Exit velocity*)

(*wind speeds*)
Ux = -7;
Uy = -3;
Uz = 0;

(*Calculations from classic projectile motion*)
EndTime = (2 v Sin[theta])/g + 5;

h = (v^2 Sin[theta]^2)/(2 g) + 5;
d = v^2/g Sin[2 theta] + 5;

(***SOLVE***)

(*No drag*)
EquationsNoDrag =
NDSolve[{m z''[t] == -m g, z[0] == 0, z'[0] == v Cos[theta],
m x''[t] == 0, x[0] == 0, x'[0] == v Sin[theta] Cos[phi],
m y''[t] == 0, y[0] == 0, y'[0] == v Sin[phi] Sin[theta],

WhenEvent[
z[t] == 0, {tMaxNoDrag = t, "StopIntegration", z'[t] -> 0,
y'[t] -> 0, x'[t] -> 0}]}, {x[t], y[t], z[t]}, {t, 0, EndTime}];

(*With drag*)
EquationsDrag =
NDSolve[{m z''[t] == -m g -
Tanh[z'[t]] 1/2 rho Cd A (z'[t] - Uz)^2, z[0] == 0,
z'[0] == v Cos[theta],
m x''[t] == -Tanh[x'[t]] 1/2 rho Cd A (x'[t] - Ux)^2, x[0] == 0,

x'[0] == v Sin[theta] Cos[phi],
m y''[t] == -Tanh[y'[t]] 1/2 rho Cd A (y'[t] - Uy)^2, y[0] == 0,
y'[0] == v Sin[phi] Sin[theta],
WhenEvent[z[t] == 0, {tMaxDrag = t, "StopIntegration"}]}, {x[t],
y[t], z[t]}, {t, 0, EndTime}];


(***PLOTTING***)

plots = {x[t], y[t], z[t]} /. {EquationsNoDrag, EquationsDrag};

LandingPointNoDrag = {x[t], y[t], z[t]} /. EquationsNoDrag /.
t -> tMaxNoDrag // Chop // Flatten;
LandingPointDrag = {x[t], y[t], z[t]} /. EquationsDrag /.
t -> tMaxDrag // Chop // Flatten;
SetPoint = {75, 75, 0};
Error = SetPoint - LandingPointDrag;
Show[ParametricPlot3D[
plots, {t, 0, If[tMaxDrag > tMaxNoDrag, tMaxDrag, tMaxNoDrag]},
PlotRange -> All, PlotTheme -> "Classic",
PlotLegends -> {"No drag", "Drag"}, Boxed -> False,

AxesOrigin -> {0, 0, 0}, AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "z"},
PlotLabel -> v "m/s exit velocity"],
ListPointPlot3D[{LandingPointDrag, LandingPointNoDrag, SetPoint},
PlotStyle -> {Black, PointSize -> Large}],
Graphics3D[{Red, Arrowheads[0.04],
Arrow[Tube[{{0, 0, 0}, {Ux, Uy, Uz} d/40}, 0.4]], Red, Thick,
Dashed, Line[{LandingPointDrag, SetPoint}]}], ImageSize -> Large]

And I get a plot like this, where the dashed line is the distance between the current landing point and an arbitrary setpoint which I want to hit, and the arrow is the wind vector (the ideal curve is included for reference):


enter image description here



This is where things get tricky. I was thinking maybe to map a great number of landing points and make a function where the landing point in the $xy$ plane is a function of the wind speeds $U_x$, $U_y$, exit velocity $v$, and the angles $\theta$ and $\varphi$ using FindFit. I am not nearly sure how to attack this, however. The final goal is to have some estimated functions where the angles and initial speed are given like functions of the wind speeds, for example polynomial approximations, such that the setpoint is hit as accurately as possible (see equations below). This makes it possible to estimate the necessary configuration easily on other platforms without the need to solve DE and so forth. I would like to be able to calculate the parameters $v$, $\theta$ and $\varphi$ on other platforms which only have access to basic math operations, e.g. an advanced calculator. The functions could be 100th degree polynomials, it doesn't matter, but they will have to be stand alone without the need for solving DEs. I've attempted to clarify this further with the figure below (SP=setpoint).


$$\theta=f(U_x,U_y)$$ $$\varphi=g(U_x,U_y)$$ $$v=h(U_x,U_y)$$


enter image description here


For convenience, one may put on some constraints, such as $(U_x,U_y)\in [-10,10]m/s$, $v\in [0,40]m/s]$ and $\theta\in [20,70]^\circ$ or something similar.


Any help or alternative solution methods are greatly appreciated.



Answer



You may use NMinimize[] on the results of ParametricNDSolve[] like this:


g = 9.81; m = 10; rho = 1.225; Cd = 0.5; A = 0.1; rcd = rho Cd A;
vMax = 40;
EndTime[theta_] := (2 vMax Sin[theta])/g + 5;


sol[Ux_, Uy_, Uz_] :=
Quiet@ParametricNDSolve[{
m z''[t] == -m g - Tanh[z'[t]] 1/2 rcd (z'[t] - Uz)^2, z[0] == 0,
z'[0] == v Cos[theta],
m x''[t] == -Tanh[x'[t]] 1/2 rcd (x'[t] - Ux)^2, x[0] == 0,
x'[0] == v Sin[theta] Cos[phi],
m y''[t] == -Tanh[y'[t]] 1/2 rcd (y'[t] - Uy)^2, y[0] == 0,
y'[0] == v Sin[phi] Sin[theta],
WhenEvent[z[t] == 0, {"StopIntegration"}]}, {x, y, z},

{t, EndTime[theta]}, {v, theta, phi}];

params[target_, {Ux_, Uy_, Uz_}] :=
Quiet@NMinimize[ EuclideanDistance[target, Through[#[#[[1, 1, -1, -1]]]] &@
Through[({x, y, z} /. sol[Ux, Uy, Uz])[v, th, p]]], {v, th, p}]

target = {67, 72, 0};
U = {-7, -3, 0};
params[target, U]
(* {1.29988*10^-7, {v -> 36.2713, th -> 0.642614, p -> 0.779455}} *)


Testing:


Show[
ParametricPlot3D[
Evaluate[Through[#[t]] &@ Through[({x, y, z} /. (sol @@ U))[v, th, p] /. params[target, U][[2]]]],
{t, 0, 10}, PlotRange -> {{0, 80}, {0, 80}, {0, 40}}],
Graphics3D[{PointSize[Large], Point@target}]]

Mathematica graphics


Direct hit!



Edit


This is a guide on how to build a model to be able to transfer these calcs to another platform. Please be aware that the full fledge thing requires a lot of computing power because you'll need to solve the ODE a lot of times.


We will solve here for a small bounded rectangle in the target and wind spaces and we will fit (only the velocity, as an example) it with a complete quadric, although fitting larger rectangles may need more sophisticated functions (impossible to know without doing either the calcs or thinking about the physics). Like this:


tab = Table[{{a, b, c, d} = {xt, yt, ux, uy}, params[{xt, yt, 0}, {ux, uy, 0}]}, 
{xt, 65, 67}, {yt, 70, 72}, {ux, 5, 7}, {uy, 2, 4}];
grid = Partition[Flatten[tab, 4], 2] /. {x_List, y_List} :> {x, Last@y};
vgrid = grid /. {x_List, y_List} :> {Sequence @@ x, v /. y};
cc = Flatten@ Table[coef[i, j, k, l], {i, 0, 2}, {j, 0, 2}, {k, 0, 2}, {l, 0, 2}];
pows = Flatten@ Table[x^i y^j ux^k uy^l, {i, 0, 2}, {j, 0, 2}, {k, 0, 2}, {l, 0, 2}];


nlm = NonlinearModelFit[vgrid, { cc.pows}, cc, {x, y, ux, uy}];
Normal[nlm]

Mathematica graphics


Testing:


nlm["FitResiduals"] // Max
(* 0.0590728 *)

So everything seems good. You'll need to calculate some intermediate values to be sure, though.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...