Skip to main content

plotting - Computing launch parameters for hitting a point in 3D with projectile under influence of wind


The end goal of this problem is to compute functions which describe the launch parameters which are needed to hit a specified goal in 3D in the presence of wind disturbances. This is as far I have come ($\theta$ and $\varphi$ are variables from the spherical coordinate system):


g = 9.81;
m = 10;
rho = 1.225;
Cd = 0.5;
A = 0.1;
theta = 45 Degree;(*0-180 degrees*)

phi = 45 Degree;(*0-360 degrees*)
v = 35;(*Exit velocity*)

(*wind speeds*)
Ux = -7;
Uy = -3;
Uz = 0;

(*Calculations from classic projectile motion*)
EndTime = (2 v Sin[theta])/g + 5;

h = (v^2 Sin[theta]^2)/(2 g) + 5;
d = v^2/g Sin[2 theta] + 5;

(***SOLVE***)

(*No drag*)
EquationsNoDrag =
NDSolve[{m z''[t] == -m g, z[0] == 0, z'[0] == v Cos[theta],
m x''[t] == 0, x[0] == 0, x'[0] == v Sin[theta] Cos[phi],
m y''[t] == 0, y[0] == 0, y'[0] == v Sin[phi] Sin[theta],

WhenEvent[
z[t] == 0, {tMaxNoDrag = t, "StopIntegration", z'[t] -> 0,
y'[t] -> 0, x'[t] -> 0}]}, {x[t], y[t], z[t]}, {t, 0, EndTime}];

(*With drag*)
EquationsDrag =
NDSolve[{m z''[t] == -m g -
Tanh[z'[t]] 1/2 rho Cd A (z'[t] - Uz)^2, z[0] == 0,
z'[0] == v Cos[theta],
m x''[t] == -Tanh[x'[t]] 1/2 rho Cd A (x'[t] - Ux)^2, x[0] == 0,

x'[0] == v Sin[theta] Cos[phi],
m y''[t] == -Tanh[y'[t]] 1/2 rho Cd A (y'[t] - Uy)^2, y[0] == 0,
y'[0] == v Sin[phi] Sin[theta],
WhenEvent[z[t] == 0, {tMaxDrag = t, "StopIntegration"}]}, {x[t],
y[t], z[t]}, {t, 0, EndTime}];


(***PLOTTING***)

plots = {x[t], y[t], z[t]} /. {EquationsNoDrag, EquationsDrag};

LandingPointNoDrag = {x[t], y[t], z[t]} /. EquationsNoDrag /.
t -> tMaxNoDrag // Chop // Flatten;
LandingPointDrag = {x[t], y[t], z[t]} /. EquationsDrag /.
t -> tMaxDrag // Chop // Flatten;
SetPoint = {75, 75, 0};
Error = SetPoint - LandingPointDrag;
Show[ParametricPlot3D[
plots, {t, 0, If[tMaxDrag > tMaxNoDrag, tMaxDrag, tMaxNoDrag]},
PlotRange -> All, PlotTheme -> "Classic",
PlotLegends -> {"No drag", "Drag"}, Boxed -> False,

AxesOrigin -> {0, 0, 0}, AxesLabel -> {"x", "y", "z"},
PlotLabel -> v "m/s exit velocity"],
ListPointPlot3D[{LandingPointDrag, LandingPointNoDrag, SetPoint},
PlotStyle -> {Black, PointSize -> Large}],
Graphics3D[{Red, Arrowheads[0.04],
Arrow[Tube[{{0, 0, 0}, {Ux, Uy, Uz} d/40}, 0.4]], Red, Thick,
Dashed, Line[{LandingPointDrag, SetPoint}]}], ImageSize -> Large]

And I get a plot like this, where the dashed line is the distance between the current landing point and an arbitrary setpoint which I want to hit, and the arrow is the wind vector (the ideal curve is included for reference):


enter image description here



This is where things get tricky. I was thinking maybe to map a great number of landing points and make a function where the landing point in the $xy$ plane is a function of the wind speeds $U_x$, $U_y$, exit velocity $v$, and the angles $\theta$ and $\varphi$ using FindFit. I am not nearly sure how to attack this, however. The final goal is to have some estimated functions where the angles and initial speed are given like functions of the wind speeds, for example polynomial approximations, such that the setpoint is hit as accurately as possible (see equations below). This makes it possible to estimate the necessary configuration easily on other platforms without the need to solve DE and so forth. I would like to be able to calculate the parameters $v$, $\theta$ and $\varphi$ on other platforms which only have access to basic math operations, e.g. an advanced calculator. The functions could be 100th degree polynomials, it doesn't matter, but they will have to be stand alone without the need for solving DEs. I've attempted to clarify this further with the figure below (SP=setpoint).


$$\theta=f(U_x,U_y)$$ $$\varphi=g(U_x,U_y)$$ $$v=h(U_x,U_y)$$


enter image description here


For convenience, one may put on some constraints, such as $(U_x,U_y)\in [-10,10]m/s$, $v\in [0,40]m/s]$ and $\theta\in [20,70]^\circ$ or something similar.


Any help or alternative solution methods are greatly appreciated.



Answer



You may use NMinimize[] on the results of ParametricNDSolve[] like this:


g = 9.81; m = 10; rho = 1.225; Cd = 0.5; A = 0.1; rcd = rho Cd A;
vMax = 40;
EndTime[theta_] := (2 vMax Sin[theta])/g + 5;


sol[Ux_, Uy_, Uz_] :=
Quiet@ParametricNDSolve[{
m z''[t] == -m g - Tanh[z'[t]] 1/2 rcd (z'[t] - Uz)^2, z[0] == 0,
z'[0] == v Cos[theta],
m x''[t] == -Tanh[x'[t]] 1/2 rcd (x'[t] - Ux)^2, x[0] == 0,
x'[0] == v Sin[theta] Cos[phi],
m y''[t] == -Tanh[y'[t]] 1/2 rcd (y'[t] - Uy)^2, y[0] == 0,
y'[0] == v Sin[phi] Sin[theta],
WhenEvent[z[t] == 0, {"StopIntegration"}]}, {x, y, z},

{t, EndTime[theta]}, {v, theta, phi}];

params[target_, {Ux_, Uy_, Uz_}] :=
Quiet@NMinimize[ EuclideanDistance[target, Through[#[#[[1, 1, -1, -1]]]] &@
Through[({x, y, z} /. sol[Ux, Uy, Uz])[v, th, p]]], {v, th, p}]

target = {67, 72, 0};
U = {-7, -3, 0};
params[target, U]
(* {1.29988*10^-7, {v -> 36.2713, th -> 0.642614, p -> 0.779455}} *)


Testing:


Show[
ParametricPlot3D[
Evaluate[Through[#[t]] &@ Through[({x, y, z} /. (sol @@ U))[v, th, p] /. params[target, U][[2]]]],
{t, 0, 10}, PlotRange -> {{0, 80}, {0, 80}, {0, 40}}],
Graphics3D[{PointSize[Large], Point@target}]]

Mathematica graphics


Direct hit!



Edit


This is a guide on how to build a model to be able to transfer these calcs to another platform. Please be aware that the full fledge thing requires a lot of computing power because you'll need to solve the ODE a lot of times.


We will solve here for a small bounded rectangle in the target and wind spaces and we will fit (only the velocity, as an example) it with a complete quadric, although fitting larger rectangles may need more sophisticated functions (impossible to know without doing either the calcs or thinking about the physics). Like this:


tab = Table[{{a, b, c, d} = {xt, yt, ux, uy}, params[{xt, yt, 0}, {ux, uy, 0}]}, 
{xt, 65, 67}, {yt, 70, 72}, {ux, 5, 7}, {uy, 2, 4}];
grid = Partition[Flatten[tab, 4], 2] /. {x_List, y_List} :> {x, Last@y};
vgrid = grid /. {x_List, y_List} :> {Sequence @@ x, v /. y};
cc = Flatten@ Table[coef[i, j, k, l], {i, 0, 2}, {j, 0, 2}, {k, 0, 2}, {l, 0, 2}];
pows = Flatten@ Table[x^i y^j ux^k uy^l, {i, 0, 2}, {j, 0, 2}, {k, 0, 2}, {l, 0, 2}];


nlm = NonlinearModelFit[vgrid, { cc.pows}, cc, {x, y, ux, uy}];
Normal[nlm]

Mathematica graphics


Testing:


nlm["FitResiduals"] // Max
(* 0.0590728 *)

So everything seems good. You'll need to calculate some intermediate values to be sure, though.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...