Skip to main content

list manipulation - Make a huge vector in a wise way


I need to construct a vector similar to:


v[x_]:={0, 0, x, 0, 0, 2*x, 0, 0, 3*x, ....., 0, 0, n*x};

where n=10^9. How can I make such a vector wisely?



Answer



When n is large and x is known, using a PackedArray may be a good option.


ar3=ConstantArray[0,3n];
ar3[[3;;;;3]]=Range[x, n x, x];

ar3

To see that the result is a PackedArray, we see that


<< Developer`;
PackedArrayQ[ar]


True



Whereas for Kuba's last array we would have False (even if x has a value). Note that ConstantArray also produces a PackedArray.



Whether this is useful really depends on what you want to do with the List. PackedArrays take up less space in memory, which is an advantage, but they probably take up more space than a SparseArray (in this case). Computations using PackedArrays can be much faster as well.


Some timings/comparisons


I mainly compare my code with Kuba's MapAt answer. I also compare with my original answer, found further below.


x = 5;
i = 0;
n = 1000000;

(
ar = ConstantArray[0, 3 n];
Do[

ar[[3 i]] = i x
,
{i, 1, n}
];
ar) // Timing // First

(ar2 = MapAt[(++i; i x) &, ConstantArray[0, 3 n], 3 ;; ;; 3]) //
Timing // First

(ar3 = ConstantArray[0, 3 n];

ar3[[3 ;; ;; 3]] = Range[x, n x, x];
ar3
) // Timing // First


3.125590
3.139499
0.048840



So generating the PackedArray can be considerably faster, if done right. ar1 and ar3 must be the same as they are Equal and both PackedArrays, but I added timings/comparisons using both these anyway.



ByteCount[ar]
ByteCount[ar2]
ByteCount[ar3]


24000144
72000080
24000144



which is in favor of the PackedArray. Doing calculations may also be faster using a PackedArray, like in the following example



ar // Total // Timing
ar2 // Total // Timing
ar3 //Total //Timing


{0.010633, 2500002500000}
{0.629586, 2500002500000}
{0.012352, 2500002500000}



Original answer



Note: It now turns out this use of Do is not so nice


This is very similar to Kuba's answer with MapAt. But I think Do works better with PackedArrays. The following gives a "list" of the required form.


n = 500;
ar = ConstantArray[0, 3 n];
Do[
ar[[3 i]] = i x
,
{i, 1, n}
];
ar

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....