Skip to main content

list manipulation - Solving the magic backyard puzzle with MMA


I was trying to solve this puzzle using mma



Mathematica graphics


It looks like the generalization of the magic square. Anyway here my attempt:-


There are four columns $(x,y,z,w)$ and nine rowa which are denoted by the array index.


First i define the variables which have zero values


x[1] = 0; x[2] = 0; x[3] = 0; x[9] = 0; w[1] = 0;

Then the equation equating all the columns


c[1] = Sum[x[i], {i, 4, 8}];
c[2] = Sum[y[i], {i, 1, 9}];
c[3] = Sum[z[i], {i, 1, 9}];

c[4] = Sum[w[i], {i, 2, 9}];

col = Equal @@ Thread[Array[c, 4]]

Next for the rows


r[n_] := x[n] + y[n] + z[n] + w[n];
row = Equal @@ Thread[Array[r, 9]]

Here we can give some upper bound for the solutions.


all = Join[Array[x, 5, {4, 8}], Array[y, 9], Array[z, 9], Array[w, 9]];

And @@ Thread[0 <= all <= 100]

For distinct solutions:


allne = Unequal @@ 
Thread[Join[Array[x, 5, {4, 8}], Array[y, 9], Array[z, 9],
Array[w, 8, {2, 9}]]]

List of all variables


allvar = Join[
Join[Array[x, 5, {4, 8}], Array[y, 9], Array[z, 9],

Array[w, 8, {2, 9}]]]

Finally when I use FindInstance it just keeps running(its been 2hr now).


FindInstance[{col && row && And @@ Thread[0 <= all <= 100] && 
allne}, allvar, Integers]

So my question is why is FindInstance so slow even after putting bounds on integer solutions.Also can this be done by any other method.


I also tried the simplest $3 \times 3$ magic square


FindInstance[
a + b + c == d + e + f == g + h + i == a + d + g == b + e + h ==

c + f + i && a != b != c != d != e != f != g != h != i, {a, b, c,
d, e, f, g, h, i}, Integers]

This also kept on running. Do you think that i just need to wait for the output because for these kind of sums mma will take that long?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...