computational geometry - Art Gallery Problem for the Castro's $24$-sided room

Art Gallery Theorem. If the walls of an art gallery are made up of $n$ straight line segments, then the entire gallery can always be supervised by $\lfloor{\frac{n}{3}}\rfloor$ watchmen placed in corners.

How can I find $\lfloor{\frac{24}{3}}\rfloor=8$ points (corners) in the Castro's room according the Art Gallery Theorem?

Castro24 = {{1, 0}, {1, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 1}, {3, 0}, {4, 0}, {3, -1}, 
{3, -1}, {2, -1}, {2, -2}, {1, -1}, {0, -1}, {0,-2}, {-1, -1}, {-2, -2},{-2, -1},

{-3, -1}, {-4, 0}, {-3, 0}, {-3, 1},  {-2, 2}, {-2, 1}, {-1, 1}, {-1, 0}, {1, 0}};

Graphics[{Blue, Line[First[#]]} & /@ {{Castro24}}]

Thank you in advance to any one who may be able to give me some ideas

Answer

A constructive application of Fisk's short proof: triangulate the polygon, 3-colour its vertices, and pick the smallest colour set.

triangulation = DiscretizeRegion[Polygon[Castro24], MaxCellMeasure -> ∞];
Needs["Combinatorica`"];

vertices = MeshCoordinates[triangulation] /. {x_, y_} :> {{x, y}};
edges = MeshCells[triangulation, 1] /. Line[{a_, b_}] :> {{a, b}};
graph = Combinatorica`Graph[edges, vertices];
colouring = MinimumVertexColoring[graph, 3];
colour = 6 - Total@Commonest[colouring, 2]; (* least common of {1, 2, 3} *)
ShowGraph[Highlight[graph, Flatten@Position[colouring, colour]]]

Comments

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

Blog

Search This Blog