Skip to main content

function construction - Inheriting Options?


This question is an extension of Passing down arguments.


To help clarify my question, I will be referring to another recent post of mine Making Quartile Plots from a Dataset, the code to which can be found here.



It is clear that arguments can be passed down as demonstrated in both the documentation and in @Szabolcs answer to Passing down arguments by using passedToOption -> OptionValue[.


Although verbose it works fine when one needs to only pass one or two options. However this convention is too verbose and cluttering to write clear code when one must pass a lot of options.


Consider Mathematica's many Plot functions and the numerous options available. While the defaults are nice, if one is making a custom plotting function, such as in Making Quartile Plots from a Dataset, one may prefer different options those chosen by Wolfram. Further, to maintain the flexibility of the original Plot function, all the options must be defined in the Options of the function - Wolfram's defaults and my own.


In the linked code above, one can see why this would be useful, especially for the BinnedQuartilePlot and the host of color functions that pass their options down several functions.




Is there a concise way to pass, from one function to another, all Options of the encapsulating function - both the defaults and those explicitly set?



f[x_] := x^2
Options[myPlot] := {"PlotRange" -> Full, "PlotStyle" -> "Pastel", "Filling" -> "Axis"}
myPlot[function_, OptionsPattern[]] :=
Plot[function[x], {x, 1, 5},
PlotRange -> OptionValue["PlotRange"],
PlotStyle -> OptionValue["PlotStyle"],
Filling -> OptionValue["Filling"]]


Answer



Let us assume that you are designing a function which can take its own unique options, but also shares option names with Plot. What is the best way to implement such a function myPlot? Below I will try to give a complete guide on how to do this.


There are two common approaches:




  1. The default values for Plot-specific options will be taken directly from Plot. Changing Plot options with SetOptions also affects myPlot. It is not possible to use SetOptions on myPlot with Plot-specific options. This is only possible with options unique to myPlot.




  2. myPlot has its own copy of Plot's options. Changing Plot's options does not affect myPlot. Any of these options can be changed directly on myPlot using SetOptions.





Most builtin functions use approach (2).


For the following, it is good to be aware that when an option is specified multiple times, Mathematica always takes the first value.


Inheriting defaults from Plot


Here's how to implement approach (1). We start by setting the defaults of myPlot's unique options:


Options[myPlot] = { Top -> 10 };

myPlot[f_, opt : OptionsPattern[{myPlot, Plot}]] :=
Plot[f[x], {x, 0, OptionValue[Top]},
Evaluate@FilterRules[{opt}, Options[Plot]]

]

Here, the purpose of specifying Plot within OptionsPattern was to avoid error messages when using options that are present in Options[Plot] but not in Options[myPlot].


An additional effect is that now you can use OptionValue with Plot-specific options. We do not need this in this specific implementation. However, specifying Plot within OptionsPattern is still necessary to avoid errors.


Using Evaluate before FilterRule was necessary because Plot is HoldAll.


If you put this function in a package, at some point you may want to add syntax information to it. Like this:


SyntaxInformation[myPlot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, OptionsPattern[]}}

But now we run into a problem. Plot-specific options work, but they are coloured in red, as if they were incorrect.


Mathematica graphics



The workaround is using an undocumented entry in SyntaxInformation, "OptionNames":


SyntaxInformation[
myPlot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, OptionsPattern[]},
"OptionNames" -> Union[First /@ Options[myPlot], First /@ Options[Plot]]};

Separate defaults for myPlot and Plot


This is the more common approach, and this is what builtins use.


We start by setting myPlot's unique options, as well as copying over Plot's options. Here, we do not change Plot's defaults.


Options[myPlot] = Join[
{Top -> 10}

Options[Plot]
];

Now we are ready to change some Plot-specific options from their default values:


SetOptions[myPlot, {PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> Red}];

Now we can define myPlot:


myPlot[f_, opt : OptionsPattern[]] := 
Plot[f[x], {x, 0, OptionValue[Top]},
Evaluate@FilterRules[Join[{opt}, Options[myPlot]], Options[Plot]]

]

We no longer need to list function names in OptionsPattern[]. But now we need to pass down all options, as set either in opt or in Options[myPlot] to the Plot function. We can simply Join all of them together, relying on the fact that when duplicates are present, the value will be taken from the first occurrence.


Now the SyntaxInformation can be simpler:


SyntaxInformation[myPlot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, OptionsPattern[]}}

The allowed option names will be taken from Options[myPlot].




Finally, you can also mix these two approaches. You can have only a subset of Plot's options present in Options[myPlot]. I do not recommend that you do this because it can be confusing to users. Either put all of them in there (the more common approach), or none of them at all.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...