Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Optimization over a bi-linear function


For the function


f(x1,x2;a0,b0)={12[x1+x2x1x2+(1+b0(1a0)a0x1+1)(1+b0(1a0)a0x2+1)],0x1a0,0x2a012[x1+x2x1x2+(1+b0(1a0)a0x1+1)b0(x2+1)],0x1a0,a0x2112[x1+x2x1x2+b0(x1+1)(1+b0(1a0)a0x2+1)],a0x11,0x2a012[x1+x2x1x2+b0(x1+1)b0(x2+1)],a0x11,a0x21


and


f(x1=x2;a0,b0)={12[2x1x12+(1+x1(1+b0(1a0))a0)2],0x1a012[2x1+b20(1x1)2x21],a0x11


I would like to solve the following optimization problem:



maxa0,b0[0,1][minx1=x2[0,1]f(x1,x2;a0,b0)minx1,x2[0,1]f(x1,x2;a0,b0)]



Here is my code for the function f:



f[x1_, x2_] := Piecewise[{{(1/2)*(x1 + x2 - x1*x2 + ((-1 + b0*(1 - a0)) x1/a0 +  1) ((-1 + b0*(1 - a0)) x2/a0 + 1)), 0 <= x1 <= a0 && 0 <= x2 <= a0}, {(1/2)*(x1 + x2 - x1*x2 + ((-1 + b0*(1 - a0)) x1/a0 + 1)*b0 (-x2 + 1)), 0 <= x1 <= a0 && a0 <= x2 <= 1}, {(1/2)*(x1 + x2 - x1*x2 + ((-1 + b0*(1 - a0)) x2/a0 + 1)*b0 (-x1 + 1)), a0 <= x1 <= 1 && 0 <= x2 <= a0}, {(1/2)*(x1 + x2 - x1*x2 + b0 (-x1 + 1)*b0 (-x2 + 1)), a0 <= x1 <= 1 && a0 <= x2 <= 1}}]

Would it be possible also to solve this analytically with Mathematica?



Answer



It is a minmax-problem which you can solve numerically as follows:


f[x1_?NumericQ, x2_?NumericQ, a0_?NumericQ, b0_?NumericQ ] := 
Piecewise[{{(1/2)*(x1 + x2 -x1*x2 + ((-1 + b0*(1 - a0)) x1/a0 +1) ((-1 + b0*(1 - a0)) x2/a0 + 1)),
0 <= x1 <= a0 && 0 <= x2 <= a0},
{ (1/2)*(x1 + x2 - x1*x2 + ((-1 + b0*(1 - a0)) x1/a0 + 1)*b0 (-x2 + 1)),
0 <= x1 <= a0 &&a0 < x2 <=1},

{(1/2)*(x1 + x2 -x1*x2 + ((-1 + b0*(1 - a0)) x2/a0 + 1)*b0 (-x1 + 1)),
a0 < x1 <= 1 &&0 <= x2 <=a0},
{(1/2)*(x1 + x2 - x1*x2 + b0 (-x1 + 1)*b0 (-x2 + 1)),
a0 < x1 <= 1 && a0 < x2 <= 1}}, 0]

You need two functions for the inner -minimization:


jeq [a0_?NumericQ, b0_?NumericQ] :=NMinimize[{f[x, x, a0, b0], 0 < x < 1}, x][[1]]
juq [a0_?NumericQ, b0_?NumericQ] :=NMinimize[{f[x1, x2, a0, b0], 0 < x1 < 1, 0 < x2 < 1}, {x1, x2}][[1]]

Now your problem can be formulated as



max=NMaximize[ {jeq[a0, b0] - juq[a0, b0], {0 <= a0 <= 1,0 <= b0 <= 1}}, {a0, b0}]
(* after 10 minutes: {0.293779, {a0 -> 0.415495, b0 -> 0.00202345}}*)

The values x,x1,x2 for optimal a0,b0 are


NMinimize[{f[x, x, a0, b0] /. max[[2]], 0 < x < 1}, x] [[2]]
(*{x -> 0.293779}*)
NMinimize[{f[x1, x2, a0, b0] /. max[[2]], 0 < x1 < 1,0 < x2 < 1}, {x1, x2}][[2]]
(*{x1 -> -2.16855*10^-28, x2 -> 0.417829}*)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]