Skip to main content

Filtering of a Dataset based on a column name with underscore and a nested string pattern


I have the following dataset :



ds=Dataset@{<|"rid" -> "#30:0", "objID" -> 1, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"TMAP-TIR"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Topic Map - Term Information Resource"},   "out_LTSnamAlt" -> {"Index_term"}|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:1",   "objID" -> 2, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"TMAP-BIR"},   "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Topic Map - Binary Information Resource"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" -> Missing["KeyAbsent", "out_LTSnamAlt"]|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:2", "objID" -> 3, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"NAM-prefer"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Topic Map - Base name"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" -> Missing["KeyAbsent", "out_LTSnamAlt"]|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:3", "objID" -> 4, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"NAM-alt"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Topic Map - Variant Name"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" -> {"prettyString"}|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:4", "objID" -> 5, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"TMAP-PROP"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Topic Map - Occurrence"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" ->    Missing["KeyAbsent", "out_LTSnamAlt"]|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:5", "objID" -> 6, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"TMAP-LOC"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Topic Map - Locator"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" -> Missing["KeyAbsent", "out_LTSnamAlt"]|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:6", "objID" -> 7, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"VAL-null"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Is Null"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" -> {"ISNull"}|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:7", "objID" -> 9, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"TMAP-ASSOC"},   "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Topic Map - Association"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" ->    Missing["KeyAbsent", "out_LTSnamAlt"]|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:8", "objID" -> 10, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"TMAP-ROLE"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Topic Map - Association Role"},"out_LTSnamAlt" -> Missing["KeyAbsent", "out_LTSnamAlt"]|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:9", "objID" -> 11, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"NAM-abbr"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Abbreviation"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" -> {"Abbreviation"}|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:10", "objID" -> 12, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"REF-NULON"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Neurorganon Upper Level Ontology (NULO)"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" -> Missing["KeyAbsent", "out_LTSnamAlt"]|>, <|"rid" -> "#30:11", "objID" -> 13, "out_LTSnamAbbr" -> {"NAM"}, "out_LTSnamPref" -> {"Proper Name String"}, "out_LTSnamAlt" -> {"Name"}|>}

enter image description here


I want to filter the rows of my dataset based on a string pattern of the column "out_LTSnamAbbr", e.g. return all rows that match "TMAP-*".


If this was a list, e.g.


lis = Flatten@Normal@ds[All, "out_LTSnamAbbr"];

I would do


Select[lis, StringMatchQ[#, "TMAP" ~~ ___] &]


It may start like


ds[Select[Slot["out_LTSnamAbbr"] .... &]]

Answer



I couldn't get this to work until I realized the keys for out_LTSnamAbbr were lists of strings with just one element, so I added First to get the string inside


ds[Select[StringMatchQ[First@#"out_LTSnamAbbr", "TMAP" ~~ ___] &]]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more