Skip to main content

replacement - Replace expressions with symbols


First of all: I'm new to Mathematica, so I would appreciate it if the answers are quite complete.


I have the result of calculation that is expressed in sin and cos. Now, all of these can be rewritten in terms of the values Tj=πj(1cosj(αmax)). So now my question is, how do I "translate" for example 1cos(αmax) to T1 using Mathematica? Of course, it sometimes requires some goniometric formulas.


I have tried to use the function Eliminate but it gives me a lot of garbage.


A minimal example:


Eliminate[
Join[{g ==
1/3*Pi*(Subscript[v, y]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^3 -
2*Subscript[v, z]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^3 -
3*Subscript[v, y]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]] +

2*Subscript[v, z]^2 + 2*Subscript[v, y]^2)},
Table[Subscript[t, i] ==
Pi/i (1 - Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^i), {i, 1,
5}]], {Subscript[α, max]}]

--------Edit--------


Following Daniel Lichtblau's code I want to write the following result of an integral in terms of the Ti: 16k2π[89cos(αmax)+cos(3αmax)]vy. Maple computes this as 23k2[2+cos(αmax)33cos(αmax)]vy and a FullSimplify tells me that these expressions are actually the same. So, some visual inspection tells me that this is 2(T1T3)vy.


However, the PolynomialReduce yields 16[k2πvy+k2πcos(3αmax)vy+9k2T1vy] which is clearly not what I want.



Answer



I'm not really clear on the scope of the question, but this might provide a start.



In[340]:= 
PolynomialReduce[1 - Cos[α], t[1] - π (1 - Cos[α]),
Cos[α]][[2]]

Out[340]= t[1]/π

--- edit ---


Here is your example. I change equations to expressions in effect by taking differences. I create a Groebner basis for the defining expressions; that might not be necessary in this example. I order variables so that the one to be eliminated, Cos[alpha-sub-max], is highest. Your Eliminate came close but I think you'd really need to use Cos[alpha...] instead of just the alpha.


In[348]:= 
vars = Join[{Cos[Subscript[α, max]]},

Table[Subscript[t, i], {i, 1, 5}]];
polys = Table[
Subscript[t, i] == Pi/i (1 - Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^i), {i,
1, 5}];
gb = GroebnerBasis[polys, vars];

Now we can use PolynomialReduce to rewrite the expression of interest, replacing wherever possible that cosine with variables lower in the term order.


In[351]:= 
PolynomialReduce[
1/3*Pi*(Subscript[v, y]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^3 -

2*Subscript[v, z]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^3 -
3*Subscript[v, y]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]] +
2*Subscript[v, z]^2 + 2*Subscript[v, y]^2), gb, vars][[2]]

Out[351]= Subscript[t, 1]*Subscript[v, y]^2 -
Subscript[t, 3]*Subscript[v, y]^2 +
2*Subscript[t, 3]*Subscript[v, z]^2

--- end edit ---


--- edit 2 ---



I saw (but no longer can locate) a comment asking about situations where there are related variables such as Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]. This poses two wrinkles. First is that one will need to work with the smallest fractional angle in order to have polynomial relations between all such angles that can be algebraically related. The second is that one must also add the obvious trig relations such as Sin[XXX]^2+Cos[XXX]^2-1 where XXX is this smallest fractional angle. (Actually I am not sure if this relation must be added, or if GroebnerBasis preprocessing will figure that out for you. Assume it must be added by hand and you won't go too far astray.)


--- end edit 2 ---


--- edit 3 ---


Elaborating on edit 2 using an example from a comment, we use more trig variables and relationship polynomials.


In[74]:= vars = 
Join[{Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2],
Cos[Subscript[α, max]/2], Sin[Subscript[α, max]],
Cos[Subscript[α, max]]}, Table[Subscript[t, i], {i, 1, 5}]];
polys = Join[{Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^2 +
Sin[Subscript[α, max]]^2 - 1,

Cos[Subscript[α, max]/2]^2 +
Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]^2 - 1,
Cos[Subscript[α,
max]] - (Cos[Subscript[α, max]/2]^2 -
Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]^2),
Sin[Subscript[α, max]] -
2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]/2]*
Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]},
Table[Subscript[t, i] -
Pi/i (1 - Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^i), {i, 1, 5}]];

gb = GroebnerBasis[polys, vars];

In[66]:= p1 =
4/3*k^2*Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]^4*(3*Pi - t[1])*
Subscript[v, y];

In[80]:= PolynomialReduce[p1, gb, vars][[2]]

Out[80]= -((2*(-3*k^2*Pi*Subscript[t, 1]*Subscript[v, y] +
3*k^2*Pi*Subscript[t, 2]*

Subscript[v, y] +
k^2*Subscript[t, 1]*Subscript[v, y]*t[1] -
k^2*Subscript[t, 2]*Subscript[v, y]*t[1]))/(3*Pi))

Here is another requested example. In this case preprocessing with TrigExpand causes a multiple angle trig term to disappear, allowing the polynomial replacement to work to its fullest capability.


In[91]:= p2 = 
1/6*k^2 Pi*(8 - 9*Cos[Subscript[α, max]] +
Cos[3*Subscript[α, max]])*Subscript[v, y];

In[92]:= PolynomialReduce[p2 // TrigExpand, gb, vars][[2]]


Out[92]= 2*(k^2*Subscript[t, 1]*Subscript[v, y] -
k^2*Subscript[t, 3]*Subscript[v, y])

--- end edit 3 ---


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]