Skip to main content

replacement - Replace expressions with symbols


First of all: I'm new to Mathematica, so I would appreciate it if the answers are quite complete.


I have the result of calculation that is expressed in $\sin$ and $\cos$. Now, all of these can be rewritten in terms of the values $T_j = \frac\pi{j} (1 - \cos^j(\alpha_\text{max})$). So now my question is, how do I "translate" for example $1 - \cos(\alpha_{\text{max}})$ to $T_1$ using Mathematica? Of course, it sometimes requires some goniometric formulas.


I have tried to use the function Eliminate but it gives me a lot of garbage.


A minimal example:


Eliminate[
Join[{g ==
1/3*Pi*(Subscript[v, y]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^3 -
2*Subscript[v, z]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^3 -
3*Subscript[v, y]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]] +

2*Subscript[v, z]^2 + 2*Subscript[v, y]^2)},
Table[Subscript[t, i] ==
Pi/i (1 - Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^i), {i, 1,
5}]], {Subscript[α, max]}]

--------Edit--------


Following Daniel Lichtblau's code I want to write the following result of an integral in terms of the $T_i$: $\frac16 k^2 \pi [8 - 9 \cos(\alpha_{\text{max}}) + \cos(3 \alpha_{\text{max}})] v_y$. Maple computes this as $\frac23 k^2 [2 + \cos( \alpha_{\text{max}})^3 - 3 \cos(\alpha_{\text{max}})]v_y$ and a FullSimplify tells me that these expressions are actually the same. So, some visual inspection tells me that this is $2(T_1 - T_3)v_y$.


However, the PolynomialReduce yields $\frac16 [-k^2 \pi v_y + k^2 \pi \cos(3 \alpha_{\text{max}}) v_y + 9 k^2 T_1 v_y]$ which is clearly not what I want.



Answer



I'm not really clear on the scope of the question, but this might provide a start.



In[340]:= 
PolynomialReduce[1 - Cos[α], t[1] - π (1 - Cos[α]),
Cos[α]][[2]]

Out[340]= t[1]/π

--- edit ---


Here is your example. I change equations to expressions in effect by taking differences. I create a Groebner basis for the defining expressions; that might not be necessary in this example. I order variables so that the one to be eliminated, Cos[alpha-sub-max], is highest. Your Eliminate came close but I think you'd really need to use Cos[alpha...] instead of just the alpha.


In[348]:= 
vars = Join[{Cos[Subscript[α, max]]},

Table[Subscript[t, i], {i, 1, 5}]];
polys = Table[
Subscript[t, i] == Pi/i (1 - Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^i), {i,
1, 5}];
gb = GroebnerBasis[polys, vars];

Now we can use PolynomialReduce to rewrite the expression of interest, replacing wherever possible that cosine with variables lower in the term order.


In[351]:= 
PolynomialReduce[
1/3*Pi*(Subscript[v, y]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^3 -

2*Subscript[v, z]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^3 -
3*Subscript[v, y]^2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]] +
2*Subscript[v, z]^2 + 2*Subscript[v, y]^2), gb, vars][[2]]

Out[351]= Subscript[t, 1]*Subscript[v, y]^2 -
Subscript[t, 3]*Subscript[v, y]^2 +
2*Subscript[t, 3]*Subscript[v, z]^2

--- end edit ---


--- edit 2 ---



I saw (but no longer can locate) a comment asking about situations where there are related variables such as Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]. This poses two wrinkles. First is that one will need to work with the smallest fractional angle in order to have polynomial relations between all such angles that can be algebraically related. The second is that one must also add the obvious trig relations such as Sin[XXX]^2+Cos[XXX]^2-1 where XXX is this smallest fractional angle. (Actually I am not sure if this relation must be added, or if GroebnerBasis preprocessing will figure that out for you. Assume it must be added by hand and you won't go too far astray.)


--- end edit 2 ---


--- edit 3 ---


Elaborating on edit 2 using an example from a comment, we use more trig variables and relationship polynomials.


In[74]:= vars = 
Join[{Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2],
Cos[Subscript[α, max]/2], Sin[Subscript[α, max]],
Cos[Subscript[α, max]]}, Table[Subscript[t, i], {i, 1, 5}]];
polys = Join[{Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^2 +
Sin[Subscript[α, max]]^2 - 1,

Cos[Subscript[α, max]/2]^2 +
Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]^2 - 1,
Cos[Subscript[α,
max]] - (Cos[Subscript[α, max]/2]^2 -
Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]^2),
Sin[Subscript[α, max]] -
2*Cos[Subscript[α, max]/2]*
Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]},
Table[Subscript[t, i] -
Pi/i (1 - Cos[Subscript[α, max]]^i), {i, 1, 5}]];

gb = GroebnerBasis[polys, vars];

In[66]:= p1 =
4/3*k^2*Sin[Subscript[α, max]/2]^4*(3*Pi - t[1])*
Subscript[v, y];

In[80]:= PolynomialReduce[p1, gb, vars][[2]]

Out[80]= -((2*(-3*k^2*Pi*Subscript[t, 1]*Subscript[v, y] +
3*k^2*Pi*Subscript[t, 2]*

Subscript[v, y] +
k^2*Subscript[t, 1]*Subscript[v, y]*t[1] -
k^2*Subscript[t, 2]*Subscript[v, y]*t[1]))/(3*Pi))

Here is another requested example. In this case preprocessing with TrigExpand causes a multiple angle trig term to disappear, allowing the polynomial replacement to work to its fullest capability.


In[91]:= p2 = 
1/6*k^2 Pi*(8 - 9*Cos[Subscript[α, max]] +
Cos[3*Subscript[α, max]])*Subscript[v, y];

In[92]:= PolynomialReduce[p2 // TrigExpand, gb, vars][[2]]


Out[92]= 2*(k^2*Subscript[t, 1]*Subscript[v, y] -
k^2*Subscript[t, 3]*Subscript[v, y])

--- end edit 3 ---


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....