Skip to main content

special functions - Peirce's quincuncial projection


The Peirce quincuncial projection is the cartographic projection of a sphere onto a square.


In short, I would like to see it implemented in Mathematica.


Here is my code:


Clear[InversePeirceQuincunicalMapping]; 
InversePeirceQuincunicalMapping[x_Real, y_Real] :=
Module[{cn, m = 1/2, th, phi},
cn = JacobiCN[x 2 EllipticK[m] + I 2 y EllipticK[1 - m], m];
{th, phi} = {2 ArcTan[Abs[cn]], Arg[cn]};
{th, phi}]


zf[{th_, phi_}] := Cos[th]
xf[{th_, phi_}] := Sin[th] Cos[phi]
yf[{th_, phi_}] := Sin[th] Sin[phi]

The contours that correspond to the equation $\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}$, besides the expected tilted square, also includes the diagonal and anti-diagonal. This is not an artifact and can be proven.


contour of inverse Peirce mapping


These lines make me suspect that I am not doing the projection the right way. I would be glad to see a prototype implementation of it in Mathematica.


Thank you.



Answer




(I had been meaning to write a blog entry about this myself, but since this question has come up, I suppose I'll just write about it here instead...)


In demonstrating how the quincuncial projection works, consider first the following complex mapping:


With[{ω = N[EllipticK[1/2], 20]},
ParametricPlot[{Re[InverseJacobiCN[Tan[φ/2] Exp[I θ], 1/2]],
Im[InverseJacobiCN[Tan[φ/2] Exp[I θ], 1/2]]},
{φ, 0, π}, {θ, -π, π}, Mesh -> Automatic,
MeshStyle -> {Orange, Green}, PlotPoints -> 75,
PlotRange -> {{0, 2 ω}, {-ω, ω}}]]

Peirce's projection



The components should be easily recognizable (e.g. the argument of the elliptic integral is a stereographic projection/Riemann sphere representation of a complex number).


The only fixed thing in applying the projection is the use of either the cosine amplitude function $\mathrm{cn}\left(u\mid \frac12\right)$ or its inverse; the choice of which stereographic projection to do is dependent on what coordinate convention you take for spherical coordinates.


For instance, if your convention is longitude/latitude (as with the output of CountryData[]), here's how one might implement the projection:


world = {{Switch[CountryData[#, "Continent"],
"Asia", Yellow, "Oceania", Green, "Europe", Pink,
"NorthAmerica", Red, "SouthAmerica", Orange, "Africa", GrayLevel[1/10],
"Antarctica", GrayLevel[9/10], _, Blue],
CountryData[#, {"FullPolygon", "Equirectangular"}]} & /@
Append[CountryData[], "Antarctica"]} /.
{θ_?NumericQ, φ_?NumericQ} :>

Through[{Re, Im}[InverseJacobiCN[Cot[φ °/2 + π/4] Exp[I θ °], 1/2]]];

With[{ω = N[EllipticK[1/2], 20]},
tile = Image[Graphics[Prepend[world,
{ColorData["Legacy", "PowderBlue"], Rectangle[{0, -ω}, {2 ω, ω}]}],
ImagePadding -> None, PlotRangePadding -> None],
ImageResolution -> 300]]

quincuncially-projected world map


The only snag in this is that some post-processing is necessary if one wants to remove the polygons that are turned into "slivers" by the transformation, as can be seen when one tries to tile the image given above:



Graphics[{Texture[tile], 
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}}],
Polygon[{{1, 0}, {2, 0}, {2, 1}, {1, 1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 1}, {0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}}],
Polygon[{{0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 2}, {0, 2}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 1}, {0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}}],
Polygon[{{1, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 2}, {1, 2}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}}]}]


A Peirce tiling


(You can do the sliver removal yourself, if you want it.)




If, like me, you prefer the longitude/colatitude convention, the stereographic projection proceeds a bit differently. For this example, I'll transform an image instead of transforming polygons. ImageTransformation[] does a nice job for this route:


earthGrid = Import["http://i.stack.imgur.com/Zzox0.png"];
With[{ω = N[EllipticK[1/2], 20]},
eg = ImageTransformation[earthGrid,
With[{w = JacobiCN[#[[1]] + I #[[2]], 1/2]}, {Arg[w], 2 ArcCot[Abs[w]]}] &,
DataRange -> {{-π, π}, {0, π}}, Padding -> 1., PlotRange -> {{0, 2 ω}, {-ω, ω}}]]


quincuncially-projected image


Using code similar to the one given above, we can see the tiling for this as well: Peirce tiled image


For image transformation purposes, however, I have found the execution of the built-in JacobiCN[] for complex arguments to be a bit slow, so I wrote my own implementation of a function that can replace JacobiCN[z, 1/2]:


SetAttributes[cnhalf, Listable];
cnhalf[z_?NumericQ] := Block[{nz = N[z], k, zs},
k = Max[0, Ceiling[Log2[4 Abs[nz]]]];
zs = (nz 2^-k)^2;
Nest[With[{cs = #^2}, -(((cs + 2) cs - 1)/((cs - 2) cs - 1))] &,
(1 - zs/4 (1 + zs/30 (1 + zs/8)))/(1 + zs/4 (1 - zs/30 (1 - zs/8))), k]]


which works quite nicely. (Exercise: try to recognize the formulae I used.)


Using, for instance, the ETOPO1 global relief,


etopo1 = Import["http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/color_etopo1_ice_low.jpg"];

we finally present the other way to demonstrate the quincuncial projection:


With[{ω = N[EllipticK[1/2], 20]},
etp = ImageTransformation[etopo1,
With[{w = cnhalf[#[[1]] + I #[[2]]]}, {Arg[w], 2 ArcCot[Abs[w]]}] &,
DataRange -> {{-π, π}, {0, π}}, Padding -> 1.,
PlotRange -> {{0, 2 ω}, {-ω, ω}}]];


Graphics[{Texture[etp],
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {1, 0}}],
Polygon[{{1, 0}, {3/2, 0}, {3/2, 1/2}, {1, 1/2}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1/2, 0}, {1/2, 1/2}, {0, 1/2}}],
Polygon[{{1/2, -1/2}, {1, -1/2}, {1, 0}, {1/2, 0}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1/2, 1/2}, {1, 1/2}, {1, 1}, {1/2, 1}}],
Polygon[{{1, -1/2}, {3/2, -1/2}, {3/2, 0}, {1, 0}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1, 1/2}, {1/2, 1/2}, {1/2, 0}, {1, 0}}]}]


Another Peirce projection


(I had previously posted this image in chat. Now you know where it came from. ;))




For an out-of-this-world bonus, here's another image that I have quincuncially projected:


http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA15482


Can you guess the original equirectangular image I made this from?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.