Skip to main content

special functions - Peirce's quincuncial projection


The Peirce quincuncial projection is the cartographic projection of a sphere onto a square.


In short, I would like to see it implemented in Mathematica.


Here is my code:


Clear[InversePeirceQuincunicalMapping]; 
InversePeirceQuincunicalMapping[x_Real, y_Real] :=
Module[{cn, m = 1/2, th, phi},
cn = JacobiCN[x 2 EllipticK[m] + I 2 y EllipticK[1 - m], m];
{th, phi} = {2 ArcTan[Abs[cn]], Arg[cn]};
{th, phi}]


zf[{th_, phi_}] := Cos[th]
xf[{th_, phi_}] := Sin[th] Cos[phi]
yf[{th_, phi_}] := Sin[th] Sin[phi]

The contours that correspond to the equation $\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}$, besides the expected tilted square, also includes the diagonal and anti-diagonal. This is not an artifact and can be proven.


contour of inverse Peirce mapping


These lines make me suspect that I am not doing the projection the right way. I would be glad to see a prototype implementation of it in Mathematica.


Thank you.



Answer




(I had been meaning to write a blog entry about this myself, but since this question has come up, I suppose I'll just write about it here instead...)


In demonstrating how the quincuncial projection works, consider first the following complex mapping:


With[{ω = N[EllipticK[1/2], 20]},
ParametricPlot[{Re[InverseJacobiCN[Tan[φ/2] Exp[I θ], 1/2]],
Im[InverseJacobiCN[Tan[φ/2] Exp[I θ], 1/2]]},
{φ, 0, π}, {θ, -π, π}, Mesh -> Automatic,
MeshStyle -> {Orange, Green}, PlotPoints -> 75,
PlotRange -> {{0, 2 ω}, {-ω, ω}}]]

Peirce's projection



The components should be easily recognizable (e.g. the argument of the elliptic integral is a stereographic projection/Riemann sphere representation of a complex number).


The only fixed thing in applying the projection is the use of either the cosine amplitude function $\mathrm{cn}\left(u\mid \frac12\right)$ or its inverse; the choice of which stereographic projection to do is dependent on what coordinate convention you take for spherical coordinates.


For instance, if your convention is longitude/latitude (as with the output of CountryData[]), here's how one might implement the projection:


world = {{Switch[CountryData[#, "Continent"],
"Asia", Yellow, "Oceania", Green, "Europe", Pink,
"NorthAmerica", Red, "SouthAmerica", Orange, "Africa", GrayLevel[1/10],
"Antarctica", GrayLevel[9/10], _, Blue],
CountryData[#, {"FullPolygon", "Equirectangular"}]} & /@
Append[CountryData[], "Antarctica"]} /.
{θ_?NumericQ, φ_?NumericQ} :>

Through[{Re, Im}[InverseJacobiCN[Cot[φ °/2 + Ï€/4] Exp[I θ °], 1/2]]];

With[{ω = N[EllipticK[1/2], 20]},
tile = Image[Graphics[Prepend[world,
{ColorData["Legacy", "PowderBlue"], Rectangle[{0, -ω}, {2 ω, ω}]}],
ImagePadding -> None, PlotRangePadding -> None],
ImageResolution -> 300]]

quincuncially-projected world map


The only snag in this is that some post-processing is necessary if one wants to remove the polygons that are turned into "slivers" by the transformation, as can be seen when one tries to tile the image given above:



Graphics[{Texture[tile], 
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}}],
Polygon[{{1, 0}, {2, 0}, {2, 1}, {1, 1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 1}, {0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}}],
Polygon[{{0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 2}, {0, 2}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 1}, {0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}}],
Polygon[{{1, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 2}, {1, 2}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}}]}]


A Peirce tiling


(You can do the sliver removal yourself, if you want it.)




If, like me, you prefer the longitude/colatitude convention, the stereographic projection proceeds a bit differently. For this example, I'll transform an image instead of transforming polygons. ImageTransformation[] does a nice job for this route:


earthGrid = Import["http://i.stack.imgur.com/Zzox0.png"];
With[{ω = N[EllipticK[1/2], 20]},
eg = ImageTransformation[earthGrid,
With[{w = JacobiCN[#[[1]] + I #[[2]], 1/2]}, {Arg[w], 2 ArcCot[Abs[w]]}] &,
DataRange -> {{-π, π}, {0, π}}, Padding -> 1., PlotRange -> {{0, 2 ω}, {-ω, ω}}]]


quincuncially-projected image


Using code similar to the one given above, we can see the tiling for this as well: Peirce tiled image


For image transformation purposes, however, I have found the execution of the built-in JacobiCN[] for complex arguments to be a bit slow, so I wrote my own implementation of a function that can replace JacobiCN[z, 1/2]:


SetAttributes[cnhalf, Listable];
cnhalf[z_?NumericQ] := Block[{nz = N[z], k, zs},
k = Max[0, Ceiling[Log2[4 Abs[nz]]]];
zs = (nz 2^-k)^2;
Nest[With[{cs = #^2}, -(((cs + 2) cs - 1)/((cs - 2) cs - 1))] &,
(1 - zs/4 (1 + zs/30 (1 + zs/8)))/(1 + zs/4 (1 - zs/30 (1 - zs/8))), k]]


which works quite nicely. (Exercise: try to recognize the formulae I used.)


Using, for instance, the ETOPO1 global relief,


etopo1 = Import["http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/image/color_etopo1_ice_low.jpg"];

we finally present the other way to demonstrate the quincuncial projection:


With[{ω = N[EllipticK[1/2], 20]},
etp = ImageTransformation[etopo1,
With[{w = cnhalf[#[[1]] + I #[[2]]]}, {Arg[w], 2 ArcCot[Abs[w]]}] &,
DataRange -> {{-π, π}, {0, π}}, Padding -> 1.,
PlotRange -> {{0, 2 ω}, {-ω, ω}}]];


Graphics[{Texture[etp],
Polygon[{{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {1, 0}}],
Polygon[{{1, 0}, {3/2, 0}, {3/2, 1/2}, {1, 1/2}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1/2, 0}, {1/2, 1/2}, {0, 1/2}}],
Polygon[{{1/2, -1/2}, {1, -1/2}, {1, 0}, {1/2, 0}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1/2, 1/2}, {1, 1/2}, {1, 1}, {1/2, 1}}],
Polygon[{{1, -1/2}, {3/2, -1/2}, {3/2, 0}, {1, 0}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{1, 1/2}, {1/2, 1/2}, {1/2, 0}, {1, 0}}]}]


Another Peirce projection


(I had previously posted this image in chat. Now you know where it came from. ;))




For an out-of-this-world bonus, here's another image that I have quincuncially projected:


http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA15482


Can you guess the original equirectangular image I made this from?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...