Skip to main content

export - Inconsistent behavior of undocumented Encode->Import->StringToStream->Get on password-locked stream


Let's save a definition. Encode it with password/key and Get it again.


We will not use Get directly on directory but with combination of Get+StringToStream+Import.


Get works with streams since V9.0 so I see no reason not to go this way.


file = FileNameJoin[{$TemporaryDirectory, "def.m"}];
fileEnc = FileNameJoin[{$TemporaryDirectory, "def.enc"}];
DeleteFile /@ {file, fileEnc} //Quiet; (*just in case*)


ClearAll @ f;
f[x_] := x^2;
Save[file, f];

password = "key";
Encode[file, fileEnc, password];

ClearAll @ f;
stream = StringToStream @ Import[fileEnc, "Text"];

Get[stream , password];
Close[stream];
f[2]


4



Yeah, great... fortunately I've tested this with different password:


password = "kuba";


Encode[file, fileEnc, password];

ClearAll @ f;
stream = StringToStream @ Import[fileEnc, "Text"];
Get[stream , password];
Close[stream];
f[2]


Syntax::sntx: Invalid syntax in or before "f[x_] :eeev" (line 1 of "String["(*!1N!*)4mx.

^ w24yf0¡'h;1;U.#+"]")
f[2]



From my observations it seems to be quite random.


p.s. using Get directly will work. but this is not what I'm after.


Reproduced on V9 V10 Win7



Answer



Being able to use this provides us with a way to produce quite secure CDFs designed for FreePlayer.





Maybe it is a problem with encoding somewhere or with overloaded definitions of Get.


Nevermind, as pointed out by Rolf Mertig if one uses OpenRead with DefineInputStreamMethod to convert a binary file to a stream, everything seems to work.




Steps:



  • DefineInputStreamMethod["ByteList", ...

  • binarydata = Import[encodedFile, "Binary"]

  • stream = OpenRead["whateverName", Method -> {"ByteList", "Bytes" -> binarydata}]

  • Get[stream, password]





Execution:


(* This part is taken bit by bit from the documentation 
of DefineInputStreamMethod *)

DefineInputStreamMethod["ByteList", {
"ConstructorFunction" ->
Function[{name, caller, opts},
If[MatchQ[opts, {___, "Bytes" -> {_Integer ...}, ___}],
{True, {0, "Bytes" /. opts}},

{False, $Failed}
]],

"ReadFunction" ->
Function[{state, n},
Module[{pos = state[[1]], bytes = state[[2]], bytesRead},
If[pos >= Length[bytes],
{{}, state},
bytesRead = Part[bytes, pos + 1 ;; Min[Length[bytes], pos + n]];
{bytesRead, {pos + Length[bytesRead], bytes}}

]
]],

"EndOfFileQFunction" -> ({#[[1]] >= Length[#[[2]]], #} &)
}]



file = FileNameJoin[{$TemporaryDirectory, "def.m"}];
fileEnc = FileNameJoin[{$TemporaryDirectory, "def.enc"}];
DeleteFile /@ {file, fileEnc} // Quiet;(*just in case*)

ClearAll@f;

f[x_] := x^2;
Save[file, f];

password = "kuba";
Encode[file, fileEnc, password];

ClearAll@f;


bin = Import[fileEnc, "Binary"];

stream = OpenRead["dumpsave", Method -> {"ByteList", "Bytes" -> bin}];

Get[stream, password];

Close[stream];

f[2]



4

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....