Skip to main content

filtering - Butterworthfilter highpass/bandpass


this should be a fairly straightforward question since Mathematica has included functionality to filter data. Nevertheless, I am not being successful to solve the problem. Following the proposed solution here did not really help, since the syntax code is not working.


If you have 3 frequency data, you may make a lowpass filter and nicely filter out the low frequency data.


Generate data:


data1 = Table[{t, 
3.23 Sin[2 \[Pi] 1.83 t] + 3.23 Sin[2 \[Pi] 5.33 t] +
3.23 Sin[2 \[Pi] 10.5 t]}, {t, 0, 100, 0.01}];
ListPlot[data1[[;; 1000 ;; 1]], PlotRange -> Automatic,
Joined -> True]


FFT of the data:


testdf1 = data1;
nn = Length@testdf1;(*Number of points*)
sr = 10^2.;(*Sample rate*)
freqs = Table[(n - 1) sr/nn, {n, nn}];
ft = Fourier[testdf1[[All, 2]], FourierParameters -> {-1, 1}]^1;
ListLogPlot[Transpose[{freqs, Abs[ft]}], PlotRange -> {{0, 15}, All},
Joined -> True]

Lowpass filter the data and compare it with initial data:



fn = data1[[All, 2]];
lowpass = ButterworthFilterModel[{10, 4. \[Pi] 2}];
filt1 = ToDiscreteTimeModel[lowpass, 1/sr];
fnfilt1 = RecurrenceFilter[filt1, fn];
ListPlot[{data1, Transpose[{data1[[All, 1]], fnfilt1}]},
Joined -> True, PlotRange -> {All, All}]

FFT of the filter data:


fnfiltft1 = Fourier[fnfilt1, FourierParameters -> {-1, 1}]^1;
ListLogPlot[Transpose[{freqs, Abs[fnfiltft1]}],

PlotRange -> {{0, 15}, All}, Joined -> True]

How do I do with similar procedure a highpass/bandpass filter ?


Everything I tried so far is not working reliably such as:


 \[Omega]p = 10.; \[Omega]s = 20; ap = 20.; as = 2.;
tf = ButterworthFilterModel[{"Highpass", {\[Omega]p, \[Omega]s}, {ap,
as}}]

Thank you very much !




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.