Skip to main content

Is there a way to draw a level tree?


Consider the following expression.


expr = {a, {b1, b2}, {c, {d1, d2}}};

One can get the levels in an expression as follows:


ClearAll[levels];
SetAttributes[levels, {HoldAllComplete}];

levels[expr_] := 
  Column @ Table[Level[expr, {level}, Heads -> True], {level, 0, Depth[expr]-1}];
levels[expr]

But when I look at the TreeForm of it expr


TreeForm[expr]

I don't see what I expected: the leaf count for this expression should be 10.


LeafCount[expr]


One can try to get the true level tree as follows:


Graph[
  {
    Sequence @@ (expr\[UndirectedEdge]#& /@ {List, a, {b1, b2}, {c,{d1, d2}}}),
    Sequence @@ (expr[[2]]\[UndirectedEdge]#& /@ {List2, b1, b2}),
    Sequence @@ (expr[[3]]\[UndirectedEdge]#& /@ {List3, c, {d1, d2}}),
    Sequence @@ (expr[[3,2]]\[UndirectedEdge]#& /@ {List4, d1, d2})
  }, VertexLabels -> "Name"]

Is there a way to produce this graph for arbitrary expression?



Also, multiple vertices with the same name List get joined so I have to rename them to List1, List2, ..., etc. Is there a way to fix this while keeping the layout of the graph? ` asically, I want to display heads at the same level as their parts, which is their true position in the tree.



Answer



GraphComputation`ExpressionGraph[expr /. List -> (List[List, ##] &)]

enter image description here


TreeForm[expr /. List -> (List[List, ##] &)]

enter image description here


rules = List @@@ SparseArray`ExpressionToTree[expr /. List -> (List[List, ##] &)];
edges = DirectedEdge @@@ (rules[[All, All, 2]] + 1);

vertices = Property[#2 + 1, {VertexLabels -> #3}] & @@@ DeleteDuplicates[Flatten[rules, 1]];

TreeGraph[vertices, edges, ImagePadding -> 40, ImageSize -> 600,  VertexSize -> Medium]

enter image description here


Update: An alternative approach is to use the original expression with ExpressionToTree and add new edges:


g1 = Graph[SparseArray`ExpressionToTree[{a, {b1, b2}, {c, foo[d1, d2]}}], 
  VertexLabels -> "Name", VertexLabelStyle -> 14, ImageSize -> 600]

enter image description here



newedges = # \[DirectedEdge] 
    {Symbol[ToString[Head[First@Last[#]]] <> ToString[#[[2]]]]} & /@ 
   Select[VertexList[g1], Head[#[[1]]] === Symbol &];
VertexReplace[EdgeAdd[g1, newedges], v_ :> Last[v]]

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more