Skip to main content

special functions - Why does N[Re@f] give complex result?


Consider this code:


BlochΚ[κ_, V0_, z_] := 
 MathieuC[MathieuCharacteristicA[κ, 2 V0], 2 V0,  z/2] + 
  Sign[κ] I MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[κ, 2 V0], 

    2 V0, z/2]

Block[{$MaxExtraPrecision = 500, ϵ = 10^-10}, N[Re@BlochΚ[-2 + ϵ, -1, -10]]]
Block[{$MaxExtraPrecision = 1000, ϵ = 10^-20}, N[Re@BlochΚ[-2 + ϵ, -1, -10]]]
Block[{$MaxExtraPrecision = 500, ϵ = 10^-10}, N[Re@BlochΚ[-2 + ϵ, -1, -10]]]

On a fresh kernel I get


(*
-0.484175
-0.993753

-1.38778*10^-16+6.17104*10^-9 I
*)

Why I get complex number at the third time even I used Re explicitly? And why the results are different for the first and third time? Did I made a stupid mistake or what?



Answer



Update: I think this is a numeric precision problem rather than a matter of the behavior of Re.
I don't know if I should leave my original answer below for reference or remove it.


Consider:


expr = MathieuC[MathieuCharacteristicA[-(19999999999/10000000000), -2], -2, 5];


N[expr]
N[expr, 15]
SetPrecision[expr, 15]


-9.85323*10^-16 + 3.39211*10^-8 I

-0.484175231115992

-0.4841752311160


Only the machine precision calculation returns a complex value. I believe that puts this problem in the same class as:



Sorry for the earlier misdirection.


Note: I believe $MaxExtraPrecision has no effect upon a machine precision calculations.



Old, misleading answer


Intending to further illuminate Junho Lee's answer we may consider how Re handles symbolic expressions:


Re[a + b I]



-Im[b] + Re[a]

It performs this replacement whether or not a and b have a numeric equivalent. Therefore:


Re[
  MathieuC[MathieuCharacteristicA[-(19999999999/10000000000), -2], -2, 5] + 
   I MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[-(19999999999/10000000000), -2], -2, 5]
]

Becomes:



Re[MathieuC[MathieuCharacteristicA[-(19999999999/10000000000), -2], -2, 5]] - 
 Im[MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[-(19999999999/10000000000), -2], -2, 5]]

And:


Re[MathieuC[MathieuCharacteristicA[-(19999999999/10000000000), -2], -2, 5]]


MathieuC[MathieuCharacteristicA[-(19999999999/10000000000), -2], -2, 5]

Im[MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[-(19999999999/10000000000), -2], -2, 5]]



0

In some manner Re did its job, nevertheless this symbolic expression has a complex numeric value.


If you want a function that operates only on explicit numbers you might use:


re[x_?NumberQ] := Re[x]

Now re will remain unevaluated until its argument is expressly a number:


re[Pi + 4 I]



re[4 I + π]

However N goes inside as re does not have NHoldFirst etc. therefore:


re[Pi + 4 I] // N


3.14159


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more