Skip to main content

curated data - How do I determine astronomical transit times?


Mathematica, through the "legacy" Scientific Astronomer package, used to have the ability to easily determine accurate transit times of astronomical objects simply, with Culmination[object, neardate]; but now lacks this feature. Is there a way to use AstronomicalData to do this?



Answer



This is not a full answer, but more a response to J.M.'s comment and provides a routine to calculate $\Delta T$ which was sitting on my hard disk. This is intended as a starting point for further calculations.



deltaT::usage = 
"deltaT[date] calculate the arithmetic difference, in seconds, \
between the Terrestrial Dynamical Time (TD) and the Universal \
Time(UT).\n ΔT = TD - UT is given in seconds.";
deltaT::yearx = "Invalid year.";

Options[deltaT] = {Method -> Interpolation};
deltaT[{y0_, m0_: 1, d0_: 1, h0_: 0, min0_: 0, s0_: 0},
opts : OptionsPattern[]] :=
Module[

{y = y0 + (m0 - 0.5)/12, u, ΔT, t, tab, meth},
(*from:http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEcat5/deltat.html*)
tab = {{-500, 17190}, {-400, 15530}, {-300, 14080}, {-200,
12790}, {-100, 11640}, {0, 10580}, {100, 9600}, {200,
8640}, {300, 7680}, {400, 6700}, {500, 5710}, {600, 4740}, {700,
3810}, {800, 2960}, {900, 2200}, {1000, 1570}, {1100,
1090}, {1200, 740}, {1300, 490}, {1400, 320}, {1500, 200}, {1600,
120}, {1700, 9}, {1750, 13}, {1800, 14}, {1850,
7}, {1900, -3}, {1950, 29}, {1955.`, 31.1`}, {1960.`,
33.2`}, {1965.`, 35.7`}, {1970.`, 40.2`}, {1975.`,

45.5`}, {1980.`, 50.5`}, {1985.`, 54.3`}, {1990.`,
56.9`}, {1995.`, 60.8`}, {2000.`, 63.8`}, {2005.`, 64.7`}};
meth = OptionValue[Method];
If[! MemberQ[{Interpolation, Polynomials}, meth],
meth = Interpolation];
If[meth === Interpolation,
If[-500 <= y0 <= 2005, ΔT =
Interpolation[tab, y],(*extrapolation beyond observed values*)
t = (y - 1820)/100;
ΔT = -20 + 32*t^2],

Which[y0 < -500, u = (y - 1820)/100;
ΔT = -20 + 32*u^2, -500 <= y0 <=
500,(*error not larger than 4 seconds*)u = y/100;
ΔT =
10583.6 - 1014.41*u + 33.78311*u^2 - 5.952053*u^3 -
0.1798452*u^4 + 0.022174192*u^5 + 0.0090316521*u^6,
500 < y0 <= 1600, u = (y - 1000)/100;
ΔT =
1574.2 - 556.01*u + 71.23472*u^2 + 0.319781*u^3 -
0.8503463*u^4 - 0.005050998*u^5 + 0.0083572073*u^6,

1600 < y0 <= 1700, t = y - 1600;
ΔT = 120 - 0.9808*t - 0.01532*t^2 + t^3/7129,
1700 < y0 <= 1800, t = y - 1700;
ΔT =
8.83 + 0.1603*t - 0.0059285*t^2 + 0.00013336*t^3 - t^4/1174000,
1800 < y0 <= 1860,
t = y - 1800; ΔT =
13.72 - 0.332447*t + 0.0068612*t^2 + 0.0041116*t^3 -
0.00037436*t^4 + 0.0000121272*t^5 - 0.0000001699*t^6 +
0.000000000875*t^7, 1860 < y0 <= 1900, t = y - 1860;

ΔT =
7.62 + 0.5737*t - 0.251754*t^2 + 0.01680668*t^3 -
0.0004473624*t^4 + t^5/233174, 1900 < y0 <= 1920, t = y - 1900;
ΔT = -2.79 + 1.494119*t - 0.0598939*t^2 +
0.0061966*t^3 - 0.000197*t^4, 1920 < y0 <= 1941, t = y - 1920;
ΔT =
21.20 + 0.84493*t - 0.076100*t^2 + 0.0020936*t^3,
1941 < y0 <= 1961, t = y - 1950;
ΔT = 29.07 + 0.407*t - t^2/233 + t^3/2547,
1961 < y0 <= 1986, t = y - 2000;

ΔT =
63.86 + 0.3345*t - 0.060374*t^2 + 0.0017275*t^3 +
0.000651814*t^4 + 0.00002373599*t^5, 1986 < y0 <= 2005,
t = y - 2000;
ΔT =
63.86 + 0.3345*t - 0.060374*t^2 + 0.0017275*t^3 +
0.000651814*t^4 + 0.00002373599*t^5, 2005 < y0 <= 2050,
t = y - 2000;
ΔT =
62.92 + 0.32217*t +

0.005589*
t^2,
(*This expression is derived from estimated values of ΔT in the years 2010 and 2050. The value for 2010 (66.9 seconds) is based on a linearly extrapolation from 2005 using 0.39 seconds/year (average from 1995 to 2005).The value for 2050 (93 seconds) is linearly extrapolated from 2010 using 0.66 seconds year (average rate from 1901 to 2000).*)
2050 < y0 <=
2150, ΔT = -20 + 32*((y - 1820)/100)^2 -
0.5628*(2150 -
y),
(*The last term is introduced to eliminate the discontinuity at 2050.*)
2150 < y0, u = (y - 1820)/100;
ΔT = -20 + 32*u^2, True, Message[deltaT::yearx]];

(*All values of ΔT based on Morrison and Stephenson[2004] assume a value for the Moon's secular acceleration of-26 arcsec/cy^2. However the ELP-2000 82 lunar ephemeris employed in the Canon uses a slightly different value of-25.858 arcsec/cy^2. Thus a small correction "c" must be added to the values derived from the polynomial expressions for ΔT before they can be used in the Canon c=-0.000012932*(y-1955)^2. Since the values of ΔT for the interval 1955 to 2005 were derived independent of any lunar ephemeris, no correction is needed for this period.*)
(*References Morrison, L.and Stephenson,F.R., "Historical Values of the Earth's Clock Error ΔT and the Calculation of Eclipses",J.Hist.Astron.,Vol .35 Part 3, August 2004,No .120,pp 327-336 (2004).Stephenson F.R and Houlden M.A., Atlas of Historical Eclipse Maps,Cambridge Univ.Press.,Cambridge, 1986.*)
];
ΔT
]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...