Skip to main content

filtering - Properly applying BandstopFilter



In the documentation about BandstopFilter it says that the cutoff-frequencies w1 and w2 in BandstopFilter[data,{w1,w2}] should be values between 0 and Pi. I am certain that this is helpful information for someone more knowledgeable than me, but I cannot figure out how to apply it to my specific problem.


I have time-series data acquired at fixed sampling rate (1 kHz) of a certain duration (let's say 20.000 data points). The data is contaminated with 50Hz line noise. How do I properly set up w1and w2, as a function of the sampling rate and the length of the data, to properly reduce the 50Hz contamination?


Incidentally, it would be nice to have an appropriate example in the documentation.



Answer



You'd need to convert your analog frequencies to digital. Using the relation $\frac{F_s}{2 \pi} = \frac{f_1}{\omega_1}$ where $F_s$ is the sampling frequency in Hz, $f_1$ is one of your cutoff frequencies in Hz, and solve for $\omega_1$ which comes out to be


$$\omega_1=2\pi \frac{f_1}{F_s}$$


So, in your case, lets use $f_1=49$ hz and $f_2=51$ hz for example (you can try different band, larger or narrower, then


{w1, w2} = 2 Pi #/1000 & /@ {49, 51}

Mathematica graphics



So now you can do


 BandstopFilter[data,{w1,w2}]

See if this works. I never tried this function myself.


Edit


For completeness, one can also use


{w1,w2} = 2 Pi {49,51}; 
BandstopFilter[data,{w1,w2},SampleRate->1000]

But, as already noted in my comment below, for my particular data, this had basically no noticeable effect on the data. Increasing the window size helped for me:



windowsize=1000; (* or at least something larger than 500 *)

{w1,w2} = 2 Pi {49,51};
BandstopFilter[data,{w1,w2},windowsize,SampleRate->1000]

or


{w1,w2} = 2/1000 Pi {49,51}; 
BandstopFilter[data,{w1,w2},windowsize]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.