Skip to main content

equation solving - Numerically Integrating to find a Maximum using NDSolve



I am trying to numerically find an equilibrium (maximum) of a function using its differential. The following is a simplified version.


myEquilibrium[p_]:=Last[{myPreviousStep=1;NDSolve[{s'[t]==p-s[t],s[0]==myPreviousStep,WhenEvent[s[t]-myPreviousStep<10^-4||s[t]<10^-4,"StopIntegration"]},{s},{t,0,Infinity},StepMonitor:>(myPreviousStep=s[t])];myPreviousStep}]

myEquilibrium[.5] // 0.5 which is correct


The function should be constrained to positive s, which is why I included the s[t]<10^-4 requirement. However this does not seem to work.


myEquilibrium[-.5] // -0.5 but should be 10^-4


The NDSolve should also not go to 0 exactly, as the real, non-simplified version contains a 1/s[t] in the differential. That's another reason I want the procedure to stop at s[t]=10^-4, before s[t]=0.


myEquilibrium[0] // 0. but should be 10^-4


Finally, I often get NDSolve::mxst: Maximum number of 10000 steps reached at the point t == 6.57563031118913721074693815431*^4952. >> and NDSolve::ndsz: At t == 1.79769313486*^308, step size is effectively zero; singularity or stiff system suspected. >>. What would typically solve this issue?


Thanks.




Answer



Because s[t] is decreasing whenever p < 1, s[t] - myPreviousStep < 10^-4 will always be True. WhenEvent[cond, action] evaluates action when the condition changes from False to True; however, the condition is always True when p < 1. You need something like Abs[s[t] - myPreviousStep] < 10^-4, instead. Note that if p is closer to 1 than 10^-4, then the same thing happens. Also note this condition controls the accuracy in an indirect way, dependent on the convergence rate of NDSolve on your particular ODE.)


myEquilibrium[p_] := 
Last[{myPreviousStep = 1;
NDSolve[{s'[t] == p - s[t], s[0] == myPreviousStep,
WhenEvent[s[t] < 10^-4 || Abs[s[t] - myPreviousStep] < 10^-4,
"StopIntegration"]}, {s}, {t, 0, Infinity},
StepMonitor :> (myPreviousStep = s[t])]; myPreviousStep}]

If you want to handle initial values p that happen to land close to an equilibrium position, then the following forces the condition to be False on the second step. The function step redefines itself after the first step. The first definition forces the condition Abs[s[t] - myPreviousStep] < 10^-4 to be False.



SetAttributes[step, HoldFirst];
myEquilibrium[p_] := Last[{
step[var_, s_] := (var = s + 2. 10^-4;
step[var2_, s2_] := var2 = s2;); myPreviousStep = 1;
NDSolve[{s'[t] == p - s[t], s[0] == myPreviousStep,
WhenEvent[s[t] < 10^-4 || Abs[s[t] - myPreviousStep] < 10^-4,
"StopIntegration"]}, {s}, {t, 0, Infinity},
StepMonitor :> step[myPreviousStep, s[t]]]; myPreviousStep}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...