Skip to main content

equation solving - Numerically Integrating to find a Maximum using NDSolve



I am trying to numerically find an equilibrium (maximum) of a function using its differential. The following is a simplified version.


myEquilibrium[p_]:=Last[{myPreviousStep=1;NDSolve[{s'[t]==p-s[t],s[0]==myPreviousStep,WhenEvent[s[t]-myPreviousStep<10^-4||s[t]<10^-4,"StopIntegration"]},{s},{t,0,Infinity},StepMonitor:>(myPreviousStep=s[t])];myPreviousStep}]

myEquilibrium[.5] // 0.5 which is correct


The function should be constrained to positive s, which is why I included the s[t]<10^-4 requirement. However this does not seem to work.


myEquilibrium[-.5] // -0.5 but should be 10^-4


The NDSolve should also not go to 0 exactly, as the real, non-simplified version contains a 1/s[t] in the differential. That's another reason I want the procedure to stop at s[t]=10^-4, before s[t]=0.


myEquilibrium[0] // 0. but should be 10^-4


Finally, I often get NDSolve::mxst: Maximum number of 10000 steps reached at the point t == 6.57563031118913721074693815431*^4952. >> and NDSolve::ndsz: At t == 1.79769313486*^308, step size is effectively zero; singularity or stiff system suspected. >>. What would typically solve this issue?


Thanks.




Answer



Because s[t] is decreasing whenever p < 1, s[t] - myPreviousStep < 10^-4 will always be True. WhenEvent[cond, action] evaluates action when the condition changes from False to True; however, the condition is always True when p < 1. You need something like Abs[s[t] - myPreviousStep] < 10^-4, instead. Note that if p is closer to 1 than 10^-4, then the same thing happens. Also note this condition controls the accuracy in an indirect way, dependent on the convergence rate of NDSolve on your particular ODE.)


myEquilibrium[p_] := 
Last[{myPreviousStep = 1;
NDSolve[{s'[t] == p - s[t], s[0] == myPreviousStep,
WhenEvent[s[t] < 10^-4 || Abs[s[t] - myPreviousStep] < 10^-4,
"StopIntegration"]}, {s}, {t, 0, Infinity},
StepMonitor :> (myPreviousStep = s[t])]; myPreviousStep}]

If you want to handle initial values p that happen to land close to an equilibrium position, then the following forces the condition to be False on the second step. The function step redefines itself after the first step. The first definition forces the condition Abs[s[t] - myPreviousStep] < 10^-4 to be False.



SetAttributes[step, HoldFirst];
myEquilibrium[p_] := Last[{
step[var_, s_] := (var = s + 2. 10^-4;
step[var2_, s2_] := var2 = s2;); myPreviousStep = 1;
NDSolve[{s'[t] == p - s[t], s[0] == myPreviousStep,
WhenEvent[s[t] < 10^-4 || Abs[s[t] - myPreviousStep] < 10^-4,
"StopIntegration"]}, {s}, {t, 0, Infinity},
StepMonitor :> step[myPreviousStep, s[t]]]; myPreviousStep}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...