Skip to main content

plotting - Why could not FindAllCrossings2D find the other intersection of contour plots?


My question is about both ContourPlot and FindAllCrossings2D. I have been using these two commands so as to figure out where two contour plots intersect. However, it seems like FindAllCrossings2D could not find out the other intersection points or I just could not manipulate on the module of it to make it find the other points:


The following is FindAllCrossings2D:


Options[FindAllCrossings2D] =  Sort[Join[ Options[FindRoot], {MaxRecursion -> Automatic,  PerformanceGoal :> $PerformanceGoal, PlotPoints -> 200}]]; FindAllCrossings2D[{func1_, func2_}, {x_, xmin_, xmax_}, {y_, ymin_, ymax_}, opts___] := Module[{contourData, seeds, optsflt, fy = Compile[{x, y}, func2]},  optsflt[fname_] :=  Sequence @@ 
FilterRules[{opts}~Join~Options@FindAllCrossings2D, 
 Options@fname];  contourData =  Cases[Normal@
 ContourPlot[func1, {x, xmin, xmax}, {y, ymin, ymax}, Contours -> {0}, ContourShading -> False,  PlotRange -> {Full, Full, Automatic}, Method -> Automatic,   Evaluate[optsflt@ContourPlot]], L_Line :> L[[1]], Infinity];   seeds = Pick[Rest@#, Rest[#] Most[#] &@Sign@Apply[fy, #, 2], -1] & /@

 contourData; Select[Union@ With[{seq =    optsflt@FindRoot}, {x, y} /. 
    FindRoot[{func1 == 0, func2 == 0}, {x, #1}, {y, #2}, seq] & @@@
   Join @@ seeds], (xmin < #[[1]] < xmax &&   ymin < #[[2]] < ymax) &]];

then I have:


u = Table[ DeleteDuplicates@ FindAllCrossings2D[{Re[-2 (α + I β) -  Sqrt[2] (α + I β)  Sech[  Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 -  Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]],  y + Im[-2 (α + I β) -  Sqrt[2] (α + I β)  Sech[ Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 -  Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]]}, {α, -10, 
  10}, {β, -10, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 20], {y, -3, 1, 1}];

I would like to show this with the following:


v = Table[ContourPlot[{Re[-2 (α + I β) - Sqrt[2] (α + I β)  Sech[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 - Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]] == 0,  y + Im[-2 (α + I β) -  Sqrt[2] (α + I β)  Sech[ Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 -  Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]] == 0}, {α, -10,  10}, {β, -10, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 20, Epilog -> {AbsolutePointSize[6]}, PlotPoints -> 200,  ContourStyle -> {Darker@Green, Thick}, ImageSize -> 550], {y, -3, 1, 1}];


the way that I show them together is:


Table[Show[{ListPlot[u[[i]], AxesLabel -> {"α", "β"}],   v[[i]]}], {i, 1, 5}];

when we stare at that list of plots it seems like I should have more intersection points for those two contours but I could not find a way to figure this discrepancy of FindAllCrossings2D and the contour plots.


Could you just give me an idea where this problem would origin from?



Answer



Here is what you get with your code,


Show[{v[[5]], 
  ListPlot[u[[5]], AxesLabel -> {"α", "β"}, 

   PlotStyle -> Directive[Red, PointSize[Large]]]}, 
 PlotRange -> {{-3, 3}, {-10, 10}}]

Mathematica graphics


And you are right, you clearly have missed some of the intersection points. C.E. showed why FindAllCrossings2D misses these points.


I think you can use MeshFuntions to find the points pretty easily:


f1[y_, α_, β_] := 
  Re[-2 (α + I β) - 
    Sqrt[2] (α + I β) Sech[
       Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 - 

    Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]];
f2[y_, α_, β_] := 
  y + Im[-2 (α + I β) - 
     Sqrt[2] (α + I β) Sech[
        Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 - 
     Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]];
plot = ContourPlot[{f1[1, a, b] == 0, f2[1, a, b] == 0}, {a, -3, 3}, {b, -10,
   10},
 PlotPoints -> 100,
 MeshFunctions -> { f1[1, #1, #2] - f2[1, #1, #2] & },

 ContourStyle -> {Darker@Green, Thick},
 Mesh -> {{0}},
 MeshStyle -> Directive[Red, PointSize[Large]]]

Mathematica graphics


If you need to extract the intersection points, you can do it like this


Cases[Normal@plot, Point[a_] :> a, Infinity]

To understand the syntax of MeshFunctions and why it worked so well in this case, see the excellent explanation here, which is where I learned about it.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more