Skip to main content

plotting - Why could not FindAllCrossings2D find the other intersection of contour plots?


My question is about both ContourPlot and FindAllCrossings2D. I have been using these two commands so as to figure out where two contour plots intersect. However, it seems like FindAllCrossings2D could not find out the other intersection points or I just could not manipulate on the module of it to make it find the other points:


The following is FindAllCrossings2D:


Options[FindAllCrossings2D] =  Sort[Join[ Options[FindRoot], {MaxRecursion -> Automatic,  PerformanceGoal :> $PerformanceGoal, PlotPoints -> 200}]]; FindAllCrossings2D[{func1_, func2_}, {x_, xmin_, xmax_}, {y_, ymin_, ymax_}, opts___] := Module[{contourData, seeds, optsflt, fy = Compile[{x, y}, func2]},  optsflt[fname_] :=  Sequence @@ 
FilterRules[{opts}~Join~Options@FindAllCrossings2D,
Options@fname]; contourData = Cases[Normal@
ContourPlot[func1, {x, xmin, xmax}, {y, ymin, ymax}, Contours -> {0}, ContourShading -> False, PlotRange -> {Full, Full, Automatic}, Method -> Automatic, Evaluate[optsflt@ContourPlot]], L_Line :> L[[1]], Infinity]; seeds = Pick[Rest@#, Rest[#] Most[#] &@Sign@Apply[fy, #, 2], -1] & /@

contourData; Select[Union@ With[{seq = optsflt@FindRoot}, {x, y} /.
FindRoot[{func1 == 0, func2 == 0}, {x, #1}, {y, #2}, seq] & @@@
Join @@ seeds], (xmin < #[[1]] < xmax && ymin < #[[2]] < ymax) &]];

then I have:


u = Table[ DeleteDuplicates@ FindAllCrossings2D[{Re[-2 (α + I β) -  Sqrt[2] (α + I β)  Sech[  Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 -  Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]],  y + Im[-2 (α + I β) -  Sqrt[2] (α + I β)  Sech[ Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 -  Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]]}, {α, -10, 
10}, {β, -10, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 20], {y, -3, 1, 1}];

I would like to show this with the following:


v = Table[ContourPlot[{Re[-2 (α + I β) - Sqrt[2] (α + I β)  Sech[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 - Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]] == 0,  y + Im[-2 (α + I β) -  Sqrt[2] (α + I β)  Sech[ Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 -  Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]] == 0}, {α, -10,  10}, {β, -10, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 20, Epilog -> {AbsolutePointSize[6]}, PlotPoints -> 200,  ContourStyle -> {Darker@Green, Thick}, ImageSize -> 550], {y, -3, 1, 1}];


the way that I show them together is:


Table[Show[{ListPlot[u[[i]], AxesLabel -> {"α", "β"}],   v[[i]]}], {i, 1, 5}];

when we stare at that list of plots it seems like I should have more intersection points for those two contours but I could not find a way to figure this discrepancy of FindAllCrossings2D and the contour plots.


Could you just give me an idea where this problem would origin from?



Answer



Here is what you get with your code,


Show[{v[[5]], 
ListPlot[u[[5]], AxesLabel -> {"α", "β"},

PlotStyle -> Directive[Red, PointSize[Large]]]},
PlotRange -> {{-3, 3}, {-10, 10}}]

Mathematica graphics


And you are right, you clearly have missed some of the intersection points. C.E. showed why FindAllCrossings2D misses these points.


I think you can use MeshFuntions to find the points pretty easily:


f1[y_, α_, β_] := 
Re[-2 (α + I β) -
Sqrt[2] (α + I β) Sech[
Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 -

Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]];
f2[y_, α_, β_] :=
y + Im[-2 (α + I β) -
Sqrt[2] (α + I β) Sech[
Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]^2 -
Tanh[Sqrt[2] (α + I β)]];
plot = ContourPlot[{f1[1, a, b] == 0, f2[1, a, b] == 0}, {a, -3, 3}, {b, -10,
10},
PlotPoints -> 100,
MeshFunctions -> { f1[1, #1, #2] - f2[1, #1, #2] & },

ContourStyle -> {Darker@Green, Thick},
Mesh -> {{0}},
MeshStyle -> Directive[Red, PointSize[Large]]]

Mathematica graphics


If you need to extract the intersection points, you can do it like this


Cases[Normal@plot, Point[a_] :> a, Infinity]

To understand the syntax of MeshFunctions and why it worked so well in this case, see the excellent explanation here, which is where I learned about it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...