Skip to main content

gui construction - How to make a control array of buttons or togglers?



From time to time I wish I had a control array of the sort native to Visual Basic.


A control array of buttons would be a table of buttons in which each button "knows" its location in the table. For example If I click on the button in the second row and third column, it would do something with the respective row and column of some array that holds data.



Ideally Mathematica would have something like a ButtonTable, a 2D version of ButtonBar.




As a work around, I've come up with this:


a = Array[0 &, {8, 4}]
DynamicModule[{pt = {0, 0}},
ClickPane[Dynamic[Graphics[{Black, Point[pt]},
GridLinesStyle -> LightGray,
GridLines -> {Range[1, 5], Range[-8, 0]},
PlotRange -> {{1, 5}, {0, -8}},
ImageSize -> 130]], (pt = #;

a[[Sequence @@ Reverse@Abs[Floor@ pt]]] = Reverse@Abs[Floor@ pt];
Print[a]) &]]

It (clumsily) draws a table of 8 rows and 4 columns. This corresponds to an 8 by 4 matrix, a, which initially holds only zeros. When I click on a "cell" it, the ClickPane returns its integer coordinates and also updates the respective element in a with it's value. (Don't worry about the Point. I used it to check positions. Now that I think of it, MousePosition may be useful to capture the coordinates.)


In a real life application, it would do something useful with the value of the respective array element. Also, I would want there to be labels in each cell of the graphical representation. Unfortunately, with the above code I'd have to enter this labels manually. If the control array were a true control array, each button (or toggler) would have its own label. And there would be no need to manually lay out the buttons.


Any help would be appreciated.



Answer



For simplicity, I'm using function downvalues as a backend (and not an array)


(* Define functions *)
bTable[action_, fArray_, dims_]:= Grid@Array[Button[{#1, #2}, action[fArray, #1, #2]]&, dims]

action[fArray_, x_, y_] := (fArray[x, y] = fArray[x, y] + 1) (* or whatever *)

(* Initialize *)
dims = {3, 3};
Array[(f[#1, #2] = 0) &, dims];

(* Run *)
Row[{bTable[action, f, dims], Dynamic@ArrayPlot@Array[f@## &, dims]}]

Mathematica graphics



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...