Skip to main content

Functions with both optional arguments and options



I have the following codes:


plotContour[func_,xRange_:{-2,2},yRange_:{-2,2},opts___]:=
ContourPlot[Re[func[x+I*y]],{x,xRange[[1]],xRange[[2]]},{y,yRange[[1]],yRange[[2]]}, opts]


opts passes the optioanl arguments like ContourStyle, ImageSize to the built-in ContourPlot function. I have provided default argument values to xRange and yRange.


But now if I run the following:


plotContour[func,ContourStyle->Red]

I run into problems because it treats ContourStyle->Red as the arguments xRange, so I receive errors (Limiting value ContourStyle in ... is not a machine-sized real number.)


How should I modify the codes so that it works when I provide optional arguments but skip the arguments with default values?



Answer



As already said in a comment, I would not treat what feels more like an option as an usual argument to the function. Instead you can use OptionsPattern and friends.


For a generic function with both own arguments, and potential arguments supplied to functions used within you can use the following design pattern



Define your own function's options in one of the following fashions




  1. with (protected) symbol (offers the advantage of auto-completion)


    Protect[xRange, yRange];
    Options[myContourPlot] = {xRange -> {-2, 2}, yRange -> {-2, 2}}


  2. with Strings


    Options[myContourPlot] = {"xRange" -> {-2, 2}, "yRange" -> {-2, 2}}



And define your function with


myContourPlot[func_, opts : OptionsPattern[{myContourPlot, ContourPlot}]] := 
Module[{x1, x2, y1, y2},
(* read in your options *)
{x1, x2} = OptionValue[xRange] ;
{y1, y2} = OptionValue[yRange];

ContourPlot[Re[func[x + I*y]], {x, x1, x2}, {y, y1, y2},

Evaluate@FilterRules[{opts}, Options@ContourPlot]]]

Now you can call your function with


myContourPlot[Exp, xRange -> {-3, 3}, ContourStyle -> Dashed]

or (depending on your choice concerning symbols or strings as option names)


myContourPlot[Exp, "xRange" -> {-3, 3}, ContourStyle -> Dashed]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.