Skip to main content

numerical integration - Is it possible to set a variable as a positive one in the whole notebook?


I'm having issues during integration due to the fact that Mathematica doesn't know if an undefined variable is positive or not (it gives me complexes which bothers me in the end).


For example I do this:



yy[x_, t_] = aa[t]*(Cos[0.1*x]-Cosh[0.1 x]-Sin[0.1 x]+Sinh[0.1 x])

Integrate[D[yy[x, t], t]^2, {x, 0, 18}]

gives me:



(10.1601 + 0.I) aa'[t]²



while the 0.I shouldn't be here. By using:


Integrate[D[yy[x, t], t]^2, {x, 0, 18}, Assumptions -> aa[t] > 0]


I get rid of the imaginary part but this has to be done cell by cell.


Then comes my questions, is it possible to define, in that case, aa[t] as a posivite variable in the whole notebook and not cell by cell?
Note that in this expample the I is not bothering at all, but with concrete numbers it messes everything up, even by using Chop.



Answer



You can modify the global system variable $Assumptions, to get the effect you want:


$Assumptions = aa[t] > 0

Then


Integrate[D[yy[x, t], t]^2, {x, 0, 18}]



10.1601 Derivative[1][aa][t]^2

This may, however, be somewhat error-prone. Here is how I'd do this with local environments. This is a generator for a local environment:


createEnvironment[assumptions_] :=
Function[code,
Block[{$Assumptions = $Assumptions && assumptions}, code],
HoldAll];


We now create one:


$Assumptions = True;
env = createEnvironment[aa[t] > 0];

To use it, prefix the intergal with it:


env@Integrate[D[yy[x,t],t]^2,{x,0,18}]


 10.1601 (aa^\[Prime])[t]^2


This is a bit more work since you have to prefix, but it is safer.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.