Skip to main content

numerical integration - Is it possible to set a variable as a positive one in the whole notebook?


I'm having issues during integration due to the fact that Mathematica doesn't know if an undefined variable is positive or not (it gives me complexes which bothers me in the end).


For example I do this:



yy[x_, t_] = aa[t]*(Cos[0.1*x]-Cosh[0.1 x]-Sin[0.1 x]+Sinh[0.1 x])

Integrate[D[yy[x, t], t]^2, {x, 0, 18}]

gives me:



(10.1601 + 0.I) aa'[t]²



while the 0.I shouldn't be here. By using:


Integrate[D[yy[x, t], t]^2, {x, 0, 18}, Assumptions -> aa[t] > 0]


I get rid of the imaginary part but this has to be done cell by cell.


Then comes my questions, is it possible to define, in that case, aa[t] as a posivite variable in the whole notebook and not cell by cell?
Note that in this expample the I is not bothering at all, but with concrete numbers it messes everything up, even by using Chop.



Answer



You can modify the global system variable $Assumptions, to get the effect you want:


$Assumptions = aa[t] > 0

Then


Integrate[D[yy[x, t], t]^2, {x, 0, 18}]



10.1601 Derivative[1][aa][t]^2

This may, however, be somewhat error-prone. Here is how I'd do this with local environments. This is a generator for a local environment:


createEnvironment[assumptions_] :=
Function[code,
Block[{$Assumptions = $Assumptions && assumptions}, code],
HoldAll];


We now create one:


$Assumptions = True;
env = createEnvironment[aa[t] > 0];

To use it, prefix the intergal with it:


env@Integrate[D[yy[x,t],t]^2,{x,0,18}]


 10.1601 (aa^\[Prime])[t]^2


This is a bit more work since you have to prefix, but it is safer.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]