Skip to main content

programming - A fast, robust DropWhile


For reasons that have never been entirely clear to me, Mathematica has had a built-in TakeWhile function since version 6.0, but has no equivalent DropWhile function. This means that I find myself periodically writing my own. Since this is a function that I use fairly frequently, I'd like to have a version that is both fast and robust. It's also the kind of function that you can write in a bunch of ways; I've tested variants that depend on While loops, on using Scan and Throw, and on using Position.


Of these, a version using Position is the fastest I've found:


DropWhile[list_, test_] := 
With[{pos =

Position[list, elt_ /; ! TrueQ@test[elt], {1}, 1, Heads -> False]},
pos /. {
{} -> {},
{{fail_}} :> Drop[list, fail - 1]
}];

The TrueQ slows things down a bit, but is there to match the observed behavior of TakeWhile, which takes elements only as long as the test function returns True. Are there good ways to make this function work faster?



Answer



Simple solution


Why not just



dropWhile[list_, test_] := Drop[list, LengthWhile[list, test]]

?


Fast JIT-based solution with automatic type identification / dispatch


Here I will show a solution that is potentially much faster on packed arrays. The code is directly modeled after this answer, so I refer to some additional details there.


JIT version with type memoization


Here is the first ingredient: the specialized JIT version


ClearAll[dropWhileJIT];
dropWhileJIT[pred_,listType_,target:"MVM"|"C":"MVM"]:=
dropWhileJIT[pred,Verbatim[listType],target]=

Block[{l},
With[{decl={Prepend[listType,l]}},
Compile@@
Hold[
decl,
Module[{pos=1},
While[pred[l[[pos]]],pos++];Drop[l,pos-1]
],
CompilationTarget->target
]

]
]

which can be tested as


dropWhileJIT[# < 99999 &, {_Integer, 1}, "C"][Range[100000]] // AbsoluteTiming

(* {5.481445, {99999, 100000}} *)

The second and subsequent times this will be blazingly fast:


dropWhileJIT[# < 99999 &, {_Integer, 1}, "C"][Range[100000]] // AbsoluteTiming


(* {0.000977, {99999, 100000}} *)

Here, we also should have a function to clear the cache:


ClearAll[clearDropWhileCache];
clearDropWhileCache[]:=
DownValues[dropWhileJIT]={Last[DownValues[dropWhileJIT]]};

which can be used to remove the memoized definitions.


Automatic type identification and dispatch



Here we will use the following functions:


Clear[getType,$useCompile];
getType[arg_List]/;$useCompile&&ArrayQ[arg,_,IntegerQ]:=
{_Integer,Length[Dimensions[arg]]};
getType[arg_List]/;$useCompile&&ArrayQ[arg,_,NumericQ]&&Re[arg]==arg:=
{_Real,Length[Dimensions[arg]]};
getType[_]:=
General;

and



Clear[dropWhileDispatch];
dropWhileDispatch[
t:{Verbatim[_Integer]|Verbatim[_Real]|Verbatim[_Complex],n_},pred_
]:=
dropWhileJIT[pred,t,$target];

dropWhileDispatch[_,pred_]:=
dropWhileGeneric[#1,pred]&;

Final functions



Here is our previous generic implementation (I changed the name):


ClearAll[dropWhileGeneric];
dropWhileGeneric[list_,test_]:=
Drop[list,LengthWhile[list,test]]

and here is a final function:


ClearAll[dropWhile];
Options[dropWhile]={CompileToC->False,Compiled->True};
dropWhile[lst_List,pred_,opts:OptionsPattern[]]:=
Block[

{
$target=If[TrueQ[OptionValue[CompileToC]],"C","MVM"],
$useCompile=TrueQ[OptionValue[Compiled]]
},
dropWhileDispatch[getType[lst],pred][lst]
];

Benchmarks


JIT-compilation to MVM is really fast:


clearDropWhileCache[];

dropWhile[Range[100000], # < 99999 &] // AbsoluteTiming

(* {0.007813, {99999, 100000}} *)

The second time is faster still, since we don't have to recompile:


dropWhile[Range[100000], # < 99999 &] // AbsoluteTiming

(* {0.006836, {99999, 100000}} *)

The compilation to C is quite slow:



dropWhile[Range[100000], # < 99999 &,CompileToC -> True] // AbsoluteTiming

(* {4.640625, {99999, 100000}} *)

But gives a considerable further speedup:


dropWhile[Range[100000], # < 99999 &,CompileToC -> True] // AbsoluteTiming

(* {0.001953, {99999, 100000}} *)

Here is what we get from the generic implementation:



dropWhile[Range[100000], # < 99999 &, Compiled -> False] // AbsoluteTiming

(* {0.157226, {99999, 100000}} *)

It is not as bad as it could have been, since LengthWhile by itself is optimized on packed arrays, but it does not compare with the JIT versions.


The complete code


ClearAll[dropWhileJIT];
dropWhileJIT[pred_,listType_,target:"MVM"|"C":"MVM"]:=
dropWhileJIT[pred,Verbatim[listType],target]=
Block[{l},

With[{decl={Prepend[listType,l]}},
Compile@@
Hold[
decl,
Module[{pos=1},
While[pred[l[[pos]]],pos++];Drop[l,pos-1]
],
CompilationTarget->target
]
]

]


Clear[getType,$useCompile];
getType[arg_List]/;$useCompile&&ArrayQ[arg,_,IntegerQ]:=
{_Integer,Length[Dimensions[arg]]};
getType[arg_List]/;$useCompile&&ArrayQ[arg,_,NumericQ]&&Re[arg]==arg:=
{_Real,Length[Dimensions[arg]]};
getType[_]:=
General;


Clear[dropWhileDispatch];
dropWhileDispatch[
t:{Verbatim[_Integer]|Verbatim[_Real]|Verbatim[_Complex],n_},pred_
]:=
dropWhileJIT[pred,t,$target];

dropWhileDispatch[_,pred_]:=
dropWhileGeneric[#1,pred]&;



ClearAll[dropWhileGeneric];
dropWhileGeneric[list_,test_]:=
Drop[list,LengthWhile[list,test]]


ClearAll[dropWhile];
Options[dropWhile]={CompileToC->False,Compiled->True};
dropWhile[lst_List,pred_,opts:OptionsPattern[]]:=
Block[

{
$target=If[TrueQ[OptionValue[CompileToC]],"C","MVM"],
$useCompile=TrueQ[OptionValue[Compiled]]
},
dropWhileDispatch[getType[lst],pred][lst]
];


ClearAll[clearDropWhileCache];
clearDropWhileCache[]:=

DownValues[dropWhileJIT]={Last[DownValues[dropWhileJIT]]};

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...