Skip to main content

fourier analysis - Workarounds for a possible bug in the linearity of FourierTransform


This is somewhat similar to this question, except the problem I am encountering is to do with Fourier transforms of scalar multiples of functions and their derivatives.


I wish to input FourierTransform[a*f[t],t,x] and have Mathematica simplify it to a*FourierTransform[f[t],t,x], and, equivalently, to input FourierTransform[f'[t],t,x] and have Mathematica simplify it to ix*FourierTransform[f[t],t,x]. I'm taking the Fourier transform of a system of differential equations for functions f[t],g[t], etc., in order to instead only have to solve a system of algebraic equations for their Fourier transforms, but Mathematica seems to be having some problems doing this.


Note that LaplaceTransform works exactly as expected, but for some reason FourierTransform doesn't perform the expected simplification. If someone could suggest a solution that also incorporates the distributive property that FourierTransform was shown to have a problem with in the question I linked, that would be ideal.



This is essentially what I'd like FourierTransform to do:


LaplaceTransform[{a*f[t]+b*g'[t]==0,c*f'[t]+d*g[t]==0},t,x]


which returns:


{a*LaplaceTransform[f[t],t,x]+b*(-g[0]+x*LaplaceTransform[g[t],t,x])==0,
c*(-f[0]+x*LaplaceTransform[f[t],t,x])+d*LaplaceTransform[g[t],t,x]==0}

Instead, however, FourierTransform of the same expression returns:


{FourierTransform[a*f[t]+b*g'[t]==0,t,x],FourierTransform[c*f'[t]+d*g[t]==0,t,x]}


There is a solution to this problem here, although it doesn't actually explain FourierTransform's strange functionality.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.