Skip to main content

manipulate - How to prevent redundant evaluations over a sample of observations in a dynamic context


I want to create a dynamic calculation (Manipulate) that will display a complex (time consuming) calculation. The gist of the matter is working with a given sample of observations. The controls will determine an appropriate partitioning of the main sample in three consecutive parts and then calculations will be updated on selected sub-samples.


The way partioning works, it is possible that changing the controls can affect only two of the sub-samples which implies that calculations might need to be updated for either of those affected samples without needing to do so for the unaffected partition.


My best guess so far to prevent time-consuning redundunt evaluation of code is to somehow record the state of the controls and if between adjustments of the dynamic calculation a sub-state doesn't change then avoid performing the corresponding calculation.



This thought didn't pan out as I had hoped for:


Manipulate[

outp = Row[{prev,,x}];
prev = x;
outp,

{x, 0, 1},

Initialization :> (


prev = 0.5;

)

]

After changing the slider, the prev value changes into the current value of the control; I can't maintain a proper history of the control values.


Is there a way to record correctly the previous value of the control? Is it possible to achieve the desired objective of controlling which part of the code will evaluate according to the changes in the state of the controls in some other way I didn't think of?


Any and all suggestions much appreciated!





Edit


Below this line is an implementation of a solution based on the solution of @Kuba:


1. create a time series:


SeedRandom[47101523]

With[{n = 300},

With[{y = Accumulate[RandomReal[{-1, 1}, n]], t = NestList[DatePlus[#, -RandomInteger[{2, 7}]] &, DateList[], n - 1]},


ts = TimeSeries[y, {Reverse[t]},
ResamplingMethod -> {"Interpolation", InterpolationOrder -> 0},
TemporalRegularity -> True]]];

2. define the function to perform the actual calculation:


splitForecastDisplay[values_, times_, n1_, n2_, label_: ""] := Module[{wspec, tsi, tsmf1, tsfcst13, tspec},

wspec = {{Automatic, times[[n1]]}, {times[[n1 + 1]], times[[n2]]}, {times[[n2 + 1]], Automatic}};

tsi = TimeSeriesWindow[ts, #] & /@ wspec;


tsmf1 = TimeSeriesModelFit[tsi[[1]]];

tsfcst13 = TimeSeriesForecast[tsmf1, {Length[Drop[times, n2]]}];

With[{ts3 = tsi[[-1]]},

tspec = ts3[#] & /@ {"FirstTime", "LastTime"}

];


DateListPlot[
Join[tsi, {TimeSeriesRescale[tsfcst13, tspec]}],
PlotLabel -> label
]

]

3. implementation of @Kuba's proposal:


DynamicModule[{c = 30, v, t, tassoc, tspec, main, mainWrapper, label},


Manipulate[

ControlActive[{x, y}, main[x, y]],

{{x, Round[c/2], "n1"}, 1, y - c, 1},
{{y, Round[n - c/2], "n2"}, x + c, n, 1},

SynchronousUpdating -> False,


Initialization :> (

{v, t} = Thread[ts[{"Values", "Times"}]];
n = Length[t];

tassoc = AssociationThread[Range[n] -> t];

tspec = {"Year", "/", "Month", "/", "Day"};

main[x_, y_] := main[x, y] = mainWrapper[x, y];


mainWrapper[x_, y_] := With[{X = Round[x], Y = Round[y]},

label = Row[{DateString[tassoc[X], tspec], " - ", DateString[tassoc[Y], tspec], " n1 = ", x, " n2 = ", y, ", n2 - n1 = ", y - x}];

splitForecastDisplay[v, t, x, y, label]

]

)

]
]

The output after the first evaluation is displayed on the left of the following screenshot; on subsequent evaluations, the result is normal (right screenshot) enter image description here



Answer



Unless I'm mistaken you can cache calculated values and reuse them if needed.


Additionally you can use e.g ControlActive to not calculate until sliders are released:


DynamicModule[{main}
, Manipulate[
ControlActive[ {x, y}, main[x, y] ]

, {x, 0, 10, 1}
, {y, 0, 10, 1}
, SynchronousUpdating -> False
, Initialization :> (
main[x_, y_] := main[x, y] = longCalculation[x, y]
; longCalculation[x_, y_] := (Pause[1]; x + y)
(*Pause only to simulate a long calculation*)
)
]
]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.