Skip to main content

manipulate - How to prevent redundant evaluations over a sample of observations in a dynamic context


I want to create a dynamic calculation (Manipulate) that will display a complex (time consuming) calculation. The gist of the matter is working with a given sample of observations. The controls will determine an appropriate partitioning of the main sample in three consecutive parts and then calculations will be updated on selected sub-samples.


The way partioning works, it is possible that changing the controls can affect only two of the sub-samples which implies that calculations might need to be updated for either of those affected samples without needing to do so for the unaffected partition.


My best guess so far to prevent time-consuning redundunt evaluation of code is to somehow record the state of the controls and if between adjustments of the dynamic calculation a sub-state doesn't change then avoid performing the corresponding calculation.



This thought didn't pan out as I had hoped for:


Manipulate[

outp = Row[{prev,,x}];
prev = x;
outp,

{x, 0, 1},

Initialization :> (


prev = 0.5;

)

]

After changing the slider, the prev value changes into the current value of the control; I can't maintain a proper history of the control values.


Is there a way to record correctly the previous value of the control? Is it possible to achieve the desired objective of controlling which part of the code will evaluate according to the changes in the state of the controls in some other way I didn't think of?


Any and all suggestions much appreciated!





Edit


Below this line is an implementation of a solution based on the solution of @Kuba:


1. create a time series:


SeedRandom[47101523]

With[{n = 300},

With[{y = Accumulate[RandomReal[{-1, 1}, n]], t = NestList[DatePlus[#, -RandomInteger[{2, 7}]] &, DateList[], n - 1]},


ts = TimeSeries[y, {Reverse[t]},
ResamplingMethod -> {"Interpolation", InterpolationOrder -> 0},
TemporalRegularity -> True]]];

2. define the function to perform the actual calculation:


splitForecastDisplay[values_, times_, n1_, n2_, label_: ""] := Module[{wspec, tsi, tsmf1, tsfcst13, tspec},

wspec = {{Automatic, times[[n1]]}, {times[[n1 + 1]], times[[n2]]}, {times[[n2 + 1]], Automatic}};

tsi = TimeSeriesWindow[ts, #] & /@ wspec;


tsmf1 = TimeSeriesModelFit[tsi[[1]]];

tsfcst13 = TimeSeriesForecast[tsmf1, {Length[Drop[times, n2]]}];

With[{ts3 = tsi[[-1]]},

tspec = ts3[#] & /@ {"FirstTime", "LastTime"}

];


DateListPlot[
Join[tsi, {TimeSeriesRescale[tsfcst13, tspec]}],
PlotLabel -> label
]

]

3. implementation of @Kuba's proposal:


DynamicModule[{c = 30, v, t, tassoc, tspec, main, mainWrapper, label},


Manipulate[

ControlActive[{x, y}, main[x, y]],

{{x, Round[c/2], "n1"}, 1, y - c, 1},
{{y, Round[n - c/2], "n2"}, x + c, n, 1},

SynchronousUpdating -> False,


Initialization :> (

{v, t} = Thread[ts[{"Values", "Times"}]];
n = Length[t];

tassoc = AssociationThread[Range[n] -> t];

tspec = {"Year", "/", "Month", "/", "Day"};

main[x_, y_] := main[x, y] = mainWrapper[x, y];


mainWrapper[x_, y_] := With[{X = Round[x], Y = Round[y]},

label = Row[{DateString[tassoc[X], tspec], " - ", DateString[tassoc[Y], tspec], " n1 = ", x, " n2 = ", y, ", n2 - n1 = ", y - x}];

splitForecastDisplay[v, t, x, y, label]

]

)

]
]

The output after the first evaluation is displayed on the left of the following screenshot; on subsequent evaluations, the result is normal (right screenshot) enter image description here



Answer



Unless I'm mistaken you can cache calculated values and reuse them if needed.


Additionally you can use e.g ControlActive to not calculate until sliders are released:


DynamicModule[{main}
, Manipulate[
ControlActive[ {x, y}, main[x, y] ]

, {x, 0, 10, 1}
, {y, 0, 10, 1}
, SynchronousUpdating -> False
, Initialization :> (
main[x_, y_] := main[x, y] = longCalculation[x, y]
; longCalculation[x_, y_] := (Pause[1]; x + y)
(*Pause only to simulate a long calculation*)
)
]
]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],