Skip to main content

numerical integration - Can you use "MaxErrorIncreases" when numerically integrating over a region?



How do you pass the option "MaxErrorIncreases" to NIntegrate[] when integrating over a region?


Taking a simple ;) example from Problems with NIntegrate, errors NIntegrate::slwcon and NIntegrate::inumri:


Ω = ImplicitRegion[
0 <= x <= 34 && -18 <= y <= 0 && ! ((12 < x < 15 && -12 < y) ||
(15 < x < 20 && -3 < y) || (20 < x < 23 && -7 < y) ||
(23 < x <= 34 && -3 < y)), {x, y}];
fi = NDSolve[{
Derivative[0, 2][φ][x, y] + Derivative[2, 0][φ][x, y] == NeumannValue[0,
x == 0 && -18 < y < 0 || 0 < x < 34 && y == -18 ||
x == 34 && -18 < y < -3 || x == 23 && -7 < y < -3 ||

20 < x < 23 && y == -7 || x == 20 && -7 < y < -3 ||
15 < x < 20 && y == -3 || x == 15 && -12 < y < -3 ||
12 < x < 15 && y == -12 || x == 12 && -12 < y < 0],
DirichletCondition[φ[x, y] == 1.5, 0 <= x <= 12 && y == 0],
DirichletCondition[φ[x, y] == 0.4, 23 <= x <= 34 && y == -3]},
φ, {x, y} ∈ Ω,
"ExtrapolationHandler" -> {0 &, "WarningMessage" -> False}];

Then on this integral we get a warning that suggests raising "MaxErrorIncreases":


ClearAll[ff];

dxφ = Derivative[1, 0][φ] /. First[fi];
ff[x_?NumericQ, y_?NumericQ] := Quiet@Check[dxφ[x, y], 0.];
NIntegrate[ff[x, y], {x, y} ∈ Ω]


NIntegrate::eincr: The global error of the strategy GlobalAdaptive has increased more than 2000 times....Increasing the value of the GlobalAdaptive option MaxErrorIncreases might lead to a convergent numerical integration....



However, using the usual Method setting results in an error:


NIntegrate[ff[x, y], {x, y} ∈ Ω, Method -> {"GlobalAdaptive", "MaxErrorIncreases" -> 5000}]



NIntegrate::regm: Method GlobalAdaptive is not applicable for a region domain. Continuing with method Automatic.



Is it possible to use "MaxErrorIncreases" with NIntegrate[] over a region?



Answer



I found the strategy, "SymbolicDomainDecomposition":


NIntegrate[ff[x, y], {x, y} ∈ Ω, 
Method -> {"SymbolicDomainDecomposition",
Method -> {"GlobalAdaptive", "MaxErrorIncreases" -> 5000}}]



NIntegrate::eincr: The global error of the strategy GlobalAdaptive has increased more than 5000 times....



(*  -6.0019  *)

It turns out not to be good way to integrate this function. Even with a setting of "MaxErrorIncreases" -> 100000, the result still has a large error. There are better methods for the example integral in the OP, which may be found in the linked question.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....