Skip to main content

image processing - Counting elements which are inside another element on a different colour channel


I have a 3-channel image which shows red and green points (certain labelled proteins) inside blue regions (cell nuclei). After applying some segmentation filters, the resulting image is as follows: enter image description here


The regions circled in blue are separated into components following steps similar to those mentioned in this guide Count Cells


The red and green points are also both separated into components. What would be the best way to count those red and green points which are bound by the blue components?
-EDIT- What I mean is counting the points per blue-bound area, not the entire image as a whole. Sorry for the confusion. A rather brute-force method would be to call SelectComponents with a Do loop using the Label attribute of the components and use that as a mask. Is there a better and more efficient method of doing this?


Do[mask = 
Image[SelectComponents[nuclei, "Label", # == nucList[[i]] &]];
redFoci =
ComponentMeasurements[

SelectComponents[ImageMultiply[redChan, mask], "Count",
2 < # < 100 &], "Centroid"];
greenFoci =
ComponentMeasurements[
SelectComponents[ImageMultiply[greenChan, mask], "Count",
2 < # < 100 &], "Centroid"];
AppendTo[fociList, {Length[redFoci], Length[greenFoci]}];
, {i, Length[nucPos]}];
Print[fociList];

Answer




Here's another way to do what I think you want to do. I don't know how it compares to your method. A lot of the code is for various visualizations. It could be pruned to just get the information you need.


Explanation of the procedure


It's difficult to calculate the number of red and green components for each cell because each cell is not clearly demarcated. Sometimes their boundaries blur together or aren't self-enclosed. My strategy ended up being this:



  1. Find the boundaries by extracting all blue pixels

  2. Fill small gaps by dilating the boundaries and then narrowing them down again.

  3. Use the filling transform to extract the pixels inside each boundary

  4. Neighboring cells will blur together if they share a boundary. By adding back the boundaries on top after filling, the cells are again separated.


The problem is this way of filling small gaps cannot be used to fill larger ones, and so those cells won't be recognized as cells at all. This image demonstrates this:



boundaries


The white boundaries correspond to blue pixels. The colored areas are cells, they are recognized by MorphologicalComponents because they have been sufficiently separated by the method described above. As one can see, this works for almost all cells.


Now, all we have to do is look at each component and extract the red and green pixels respectively, then use MorphologicalComponents and ComponentMeasurements to figure out how many of each type there is.


The Code


extractColor[img_Image, col : "Red" | "Green" | "Blue"] := 
Module[{c = col, i = img, sep},
sep = ColorSeparate[i];
If[c == "Green", sep = RotateLeft[sep]];
If[c == "Blue", sep = RotateRight[sep]];
ImageSubtract[ImageSubtract[#1, #2], #3] & @@ sep

];
healingBrush[img_Image, brushSize_] :=
Binarize[Thinning[Dilation[img, DiskMatrix[brushSize]]], 0.1]
countClusters[
img_Image] := (ComponentMeasurements[MorphologicalComponents[#],
"LabelCount"] & /@ {extractColor[img, "Red"],
extractColor[img, "Green"]})[[All, 1, 2]]

img = Import["http://i.stack.imgur.com/n6Eit.png"];


borders = healingBrush[extractColor[img, "Blue"], 1];
components =
MorphologicalComponents[
ImageMultiply[ColorNegate[Dilation[borders, 0.5]],
FillingTransform@borders]] // Colorize

Show[components,
ColorNegate@SetAlphaChannel[ColorNegate@borders, borders]]

isolatedComponents =

ComponentMeasurements[
components, {"Centroid", "Mask"}] /. (i_ -> {l_, m_}) :> {i, l,
countClusters[ImageMultiply[img, Image[m]]]};

Show[img,
Graphics[{White,
Text["R: " <> ToString[#[[3, 1]]] <> "\nG: " <>
ToString[#[[3, 2]]], #[[2]]] & /@ isolatedComponents}]]

Final result



result


The data used for this visualization is stored in isolatedComponents.


(Someone who'd want to use this would be wise to count manually for a few cells and compare the result. I did not do this.)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...