Skip to main content

graphs and networks - FindShortestTour for charity (or: How can I optimize meal delivery with FindShortestTour?)


I've been wondering about this for a while - but never got around to asking - until I saw faleichik's incredible answer to Mathematica Minecraft.



I did some work at a not-for-profit a little while ago, which participated in a program called Meals On Wheels - wherein I helped to deliver food to those who are homebound. Myself and a partner would deliver meals to a daily list of addresses, sorted by name; not the most efficient route. The time to complete a route varied by as much as two hours because of it.


FindShortestTour, however, is only one (possible) part of the solution. I'd need to parse addresses, read map data, and handle the slight irregularities of NYC streets.


How can I use FindShortestTour to find the optimal meal delivery route, given a list of addresses?



Answer



When I did a similar job, it wasn't really the distance that made the difference. It would sometimes be quicker to drive 30 miles into the country for a drop than to try to cross the city at rush hour or during the school run. So it might be worth trying to work out the times between each drop and then find the route that has the shortest total time, rather than do it by distances on a map.


Here, rather clumsily derived, is a list of the different routes between, say, 8 places:


numberOfPlaces = 8;
edges = DeleteCases[
Map[#[[1]] \[DirectedEdge] #[[2]] &,
Tuples[Range[1, numberOfPlaces], {2}]],

x_ \[DirectedEdge] x_ /; x == x]

and we can assign times in minutes for travelling between each place, here just randomly. This is a bit of work initially, but most drivers would be able to estimate the times quite quickly.


randomweights = RandomInteger[{0, 45}, Length[edges]]


{17, 38, 25, 17, 9, 42, 7, 42, 11, 14, 40, 17, 4, 23, 4, ... 40}



Combine these with the edges:


edgeWeightRules = 

MapThread[
Rule, {edges, randomweights}] /.
(1 \[DirectedEdge] 4 -> n_) -> 1 \[DirectedEdge] 4 -> 200

I've set the value for traveling between places 1 and 4 to 200, for use later on. Next, draw a graph:


 cg = Graph[edges, 
VertexLabels -> "Name",
VertexStyle -> Red,
EdgeWeight -> edgeWeightRules,
EdgeLabels -> edgeWeightRules,

ImagePadding -> 10]

simple graph


This is not a physical map, but a picture showing the different travel times between different places. Then create a weighted adjacency graph:


wam = Normal[WeightedAdjacencyMatrix[cg]] /. 0 -> Infinity;
wag = WeightedAdjacencyGraph[wam,
EdgeShapeFunction ->
GraphElementData[{"DotLine", "ArrowSize" -> .01}],
VertexLabels -> "Name",
EdgeWeight -> edgeWeightRules,

EdgeLabels -> edgeWeightRules,
EdgeLabelStyle -> Directive[Gray, Italic, 12],
VertexLabelStyle -> Directive[Black, 16],
EdgeStyle -> Directive[LightGray],
ImagePadding -> 20]

weighted adjacency graph


Apparently, a Hamiltonian cycle is not a two-wheeled delivery device, but a path visting every vertex exactly once:


FindHamiltonianCycle[wag, All]



{{1 -> 2, 2 -> 3, 3 -> 4, 4 -> 5, 5 -> 6, 6 -> 7, 7 -> 1}



so we should find all of them, and then sort them by the total time each one takes:


routes = Sort[{Total[# /. edgeWeightRules], #} & /@ 
FindHamiltonianCycle[wag, All]]

This returns a list of all possible cycles, with the quickest one first. So the quickest route that turns up at all locations once takes 54 minutes (that's driving past and throwing the items out of the window...:).



{54, {1 -> 6, 6 -> 4, 4 -> 3, 3 -> 5, 5 -> 7, 7 -> 2, 2 -> 1}}




Then it's possible to investigate the different routes, using a Manipulate to step through the Hamiltonian cycles:


Manipulate[
Column[{
Row[{"length of ", Last[routes[[n]]], " is ", First@routes[[n]]}],
HighlightGraph[
wag,
PathGraph[
Last@routes[[n]],
DirectedEdges -> True],

GraphHighlightStyle -> "Thick",
ImageSize -> 400]
}], {n, 1, Length[routes], 1}]

manipulate for exploring the routes


The artificially slowed-down route shows up as being part of the longest cycles.


At least this approach avoids the problems of trying to find routes through the one-way systems of cities.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...