Skip to main content

Find names of the functions defined in a file


Lets say I have a file named file.m that contains:



test[] := (
Print["test"]
)

How would I go about extracting the function declarations in such a file consistently as a list?


I have figured out how to extract the data without having it execute.


Import["file.m", "Text"]

This is my current code.


Cases[

FullForm[
MakeExpression[Import["file.m", "Text"], TraditionalForm]
],
SetDelayed[x__, y__] -> f[x, y]
]

Answer



Preamble


This is not such an easy task actually, if you want to do this fast and clean. I have been developing some functionality for one of my side projects, for which I needed to analyze symbols inside packages, so I will share some of the code I ended up with.


Speed


The following function will be two orders of magnitude faster than the one based on Import[...,"HeldExpressions"]:



ClearAll[loadFile];
loadFile[path_String?FileExistsQ]:=
DeleteCases[
ToExpression[
FromCharacterCode[BinaryReadList[path]],InputForm,HoldComplete
],
Null
]

hopefully this function is still robust enough.



Benchmarks


Benchmarks on a medium-size package:


file = FileNameJoin[{$InstallationDirectory,"SystemFiles","Links","JLink", "JLink.m"}];

Do[Import[file, "HeldExpressions"], {100}] // AbsoluteTiming
Do[loadFile[file], {100}] // AbsoluteTiming

(*

{4.351563, Null}

{0.153320, Null}
*)

The format of the result of loadFile is a little different - it just wraps all code in one HoldComplete. But it is easy to transform to the partial HoldComplete wrapped around the pieces.


The speed difference can be quite important (for my application it was. I would have been in trouble using Import).


Namespace pollution


The problem


Perhaps even worse than the speed issue is the one of namespace pollution, which is a flaw shared by both methods described so far. The new symbols are being created as a result of parsing the code, and they are created in whatever happens to be the current working context. For example, for the case at hand:


Names["Global`*`*"]//Short


(*
{Global`Private`arg,Global`Private`arg$,Global`Private`e,
<<21>>,Global`Private`val,Global`Private`val$,Global`Package`$jlinkDir}
*)

Sugegsted solution


With the implementation details described at the bottom of the post, here is the way I ended up doing this: I introduced the macro with the following signature:


withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext[{var_Symbol, code_}, fname_, opts : OptionsPattern[]]

which is supposed to read in the file fname, parse it into some temporary context, assign the result to a variable var, then execute the code code, and finally clean up that temporary context. Here is an example of use (you will need to run the code posted below for it to work):



Block[
{
heldCode,
file=
FileNameJoin[
{$InstallationDirectory,"SystemFiles","Links","JLink","JLink.m"}
]
},
withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext[
{

heldCode,
Union[
Cases[heldCode,s_Symbol:>ToString[Unevaluated[s]],\[Infinity],Heads->True]
]
},
file
]
]

This code collects all the symbols which build up the code being read. The result looks like:



(*
{And,AppendTo,BeginPackage,Blank,Check,Close,
<<78>>,$ContextPath,$Failed,$Input,$Off,$SystemID,$VersionNumber}
*)

but one can check that the working context (or any other context) was not polluted.


Implementation


Here is the code (formatting done using the code formatter palette):


SetAttributes[CleanUp,HoldAll];
CleanUp[expr_,cleanup_]:=

Module[{exprFn,result,abort=False,rethrow=True,seq},
exprFn[]:=
expr;
result=
CheckAbort[
Catch[Catch[result=exprFn[];rethrow=False;result],_,seq[##1]&],
abort=True
];
cleanup;
If[abort,Abort[]];

If[rethrow,Throw[result/.
seq->Sequence]];
result
]

SetAttributes[parseInContext,HoldFirst];
Options[parseInContext]=
{
LocalizingContext->"MyLocalizingContext`",
DefaultImportedContexts:>{},

ExtraImportedContexts:>{}
};
parseInContext[code_,opts:OptionsPattern[]]:=
Module[
{
result,
context=OptionValue[LocalizingContext],
defcontexts=OptionValue[DefaultImportedContexts],
extraContexts=OptionValue[ExtraImportedContexts],
allContexts

},
allContexts={Sequence@@defcontexts,Sequence@@extraContexts};
Block[{$ContextPath},
CleanUp[
BeginPackage[context];Needs/@allContexts;result=code,
EndPackage[]
];
result
]
];



ClearAll[inPrivateContext];
SetAttributes[inPrivateContext,HoldAll];
inPrivateContext[code_]:=
CleanUp[Begin["`Private`"];code,End[]];


ClearAll[parseInPrivateSubcontext];
SetAttributes[parseInPrivateSubcontext,HoldFirst];

parseInPrivateSubcontext[code_,opts:OptionsPattern[]]:=
parseInContext[inPrivateContext[code],opts];


ClearAll[withTemporaryContext];
SetAttributes[withTemporaryContext,HoldRest];
withTemporaryContext[context_String,{contVar_Symbol,code_}]:=
Block[{contVar=context},
With[{names=context<>"Private`*",remove=If[Names[#1]=!={},Remove[#1]]&},
CleanUp[remove[names];code,remove[names]]

]
];


ClearAll[withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext];
Options[withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext]=
{
TemporaryContextName->"TemporaryContext`",
ExtraImportedContexts:>{"Global`"}
};

SetAttributes[withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext,HoldFirst];
withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext[
{var_Symbol,code_},fname_,opts:OptionsPattern[]
]:=
Module[{tempcont},
Block[{var},
withTemporaryContext[
OptionValue[TemporaryContextName],
{
tempcont,

parseInPrivateSubcontext[
var=loadFile[fname];code,
LocalizingContext->tempcont,
ExtraImportedContexts->OptionValue[ExtraImportedContexts]
]
}
]
]
];


The code contains a number of macros,some of which are general (like WReach's CleanUp and a few others), while others specialize the generic ones to the more narrow goals we set here.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...