Skip to main content

Find names of the functions defined in a file


Lets say I have a file named file.m that contains:



test[] := (
Print["test"]
)

How would I go about extracting the function declarations in such a file consistently as a list?


I have figured out how to extract the data without having it execute.


Import["file.m", "Text"]

This is my current code.


Cases[

FullForm[
MakeExpression[Import["file.m", "Text"], TraditionalForm]
],
SetDelayed[x__, y__] -> f[x, y]
]

Answer



Preamble


This is not such an easy task actually, if you want to do this fast and clean. I have been developing some functionality for one of my side projects, for which I needed to analyze symbols inside packages, so I will share some of the code I ended up with.


Speed


The following function will be two orders of magnitude faster than the one based on Import[...,"HeldExpressions"]:



ClearAll[loadFile];
loadFile[path_String?FileExistsQ]:=
DeleteCases[
ToExpression[
FromCharacterCode[BinaryReadList[path]],InputForm,HoldComplete
],
Null
]

hopefully this function is still robust enough.



Benchmarks


Benchmarks on a medium-size package:


file = FileNameJoin[{$InstallationDirectory,"SystemFiles","Links","JLink", "JLink.m"}];

Do[Import[file, "HeldExpressions"], {100}] // AbsoluteTiming
Do[loadFile[file], {100}] // AbsoluteTiming

(*

{4.351563, Null}

{0.153320, Null}
*)

The format of the result of loadFile is a little different - it just wraps all code in one HoldComplete. But it is easy to transform to the partial HoldComplete wrapped around the pieces.


The speed difference can be quite important (for my application it was. I would have been in trouble using Import).


Namespace pollution


The problem


Perhaps even worse than the speed issue is the one of namespace pollution, which is a flaw shared by both methods described so far. The new symbols are being created as a result of parsing the code, and they are created in whatever happens to be the current working context. For example, for the case at hand:


Names["Global`*`*"]//Short


(*
{Global`Private`arg,Global`Private`arg$,Global`Private`e,
<<21>>,Global`Private`val,Global`Private`val$,Global`Package`$jlinkDir}
*)

Sugegsted solution


With the implementation details described at the bottom of the post, here is the way I ended up doing this: I introduced the macro with the following signature:


withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext[{var_Symbol, code_}, fname_, opts : OptionsPattern[]]

which is supposed to read in the file fname, parse it into some temporary context, assign the result to a variable var, then execute the code code, and finally clean up that temporary context. Here is an example of use (you will need to run the code posted below for it to work):



Block[
{
heldCode,
file=
FileNameJoin[
{$InstallationDirectory,"SystemFiles","Links","JLink","JLink.m"}
]
},
withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext[
{

heldCode,
Union[
Cases[heldCode,s_Symbol:>ToString[Unevaluated[s]],\[Infinity],Heads->True]
]
},
file
]
]

This code collects all the symbols which build up the code being read. The result looks like:



(*
{And,AppendTo,BeginPackage,Blank,Check,Close,
<<78>>,$ContextPath,$Failed,$Input,$Off,$SystemID,$VersionNumber}
*)

but one can check that the working context (or any other context) was not polluted.


Implementation


Here is the code (formatting done using the code formatter palette):


SetAttributes[CleanUp,HoldAll];
CleanUp[expr_,cleanup_]:=

Module[{exprFn,result,abort=False,rethrow=True,seq},
exprFn[]:=
expr;
result=
CheckAbort[
Catch[Catch[result=exprFn[];rethrow=False;result],_,seq[##1]&],
abort=True
];
cleanup;
If[abort,Abort[]];

If[rethrow,Throw[result/.
seq->Sequence]];
result
]

SetAttributes[parseInContext,HoldFirst];
Options[parseInContext]=
{
LocalizingContext->"MyLocalizingContext`",
DefaultImportedContexts:>{},

ExtraImportedContexts:>{}
};
parseInContext[code_,opts:OptionsPattern[]]:=
Module[
{
result,
context=OptionValue[LocalizingContext],
defcontexts=OptionValue[DefaultImportedContexts],
extraContexts=OptionValue[ExtraImportedContexts],
allContexts

},
allContexts={Sequence@@defcontexts,Sequence@@extraContexts};
Block[{$ContextPath},
CleanUp[
BeginPackage[context];Needs/@allContexts;result=code,
EndPackage[]
];
result
]
];



ClearAll[inPrivateContext];
SetAttributes[inPrivateContext,HoldAll];
inPrivateContext[code_]:=
CleanUp[Begin["`Private`"];code,End[]];


ClearAll[parseInPrivateSubcontext];
SetAttributes[parseInPrivateSubcontext,HoldFirst];

parseInPrivateSubcontext[code_,opts:OptionsPattern[]]:=
parseInContext[inPrivateContext[code],opts];


ClearAll[withTemporaryContext];
SetAttributes[withTemporaryContext,HoldRest];
withTemporaryContext[context_String,{contVar_Symbol,code_}]:=
Block[{contVar=context},
With[{names=context<>"Private`*",remove=If[Names[#1]=!={},Remove[#1]]&},
CleanUp[remove[names];code,remove[names]]

]
];


ClearAll[withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext];
Options[withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext]=
{
TemporaryContextName->"TemporaryContext`",
ExtraImportedContexts:>{"Global`"}
};

SetAttributes[withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext,HoldFirst];
withHeldCodeInTemporaryContext[
{var_Symbol,code_},fname_,opts:OptionsPattern[]
]:=
Module[{tempcont},
Block[{var},
withTemporaryContext[
OptionValue[TemporaryContextName],
{
tempcont,

parseInPrivateSubcontext[
var=loadFile[fname];code,
LocalizingContext->tempcont,
ExtraImportedContexts->OptionValue[ExtraImportedContexts]
]
}
]
]
];


The code contains a number of macros,some of which are general (like WReach's CleanUp and a few others), while others specialize the generic ones to the more narrow goals we set here.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...