Skip to main content

programming - How can you give a Module a context and have its local variables and Modules belong to that context?


What would be the best way to give a module its own context and have its local variables and Modules belong to that context?



Answer




Here is an idea:


SetAttributes[account, HoldAll ]

makeAccount[ initBalance_ ] :=
Module[ { balance = initBalance },
account[ balance ]
]

account /: balance[ account[ bal_ ] ] := bal


account /: deposit[ account[ bal_ ], newBal_ ] := ( bal += newBal )

account /: withdraw[ account[ bal_ ], amount_ ] := ( bal -= amount ) /;
amount <= bal
account /: withdraw[ account[ bal_ ], amount_ ] :=
Print[ "Save some cash first" ] /; amount > bal

Format[ acc_account /; ValueQ[ balance[ acc ] ] ] := "-account-"

Then use this as:



a1 = makeAccount[100]
a2 = makeAccount[150]

balance[a1]

100


deposit[a1, 100]

200


balance[a1]


200


balance[a2]

150


This works because of the unique symbol:


FullForm[a1]

Edit:


Here is a version without SetAttributes



makeAccount1[ initBalance_ ] :=

Module[ { balance = initBalance , withdraw, deposit, amount,
dispatch},

withdraw[ amount_ ] :=
Module[ {},
If[ balance >= amount,
balance -= amount; balance,
Print[ "Insufficient funds" ]

]
];

deposit[ amount_ ] :=
Module[ {},
balance += amount;
balance
];

amount[ amount_ ] :=

Module[ {},
balance
];

dispatch[m_] :=
Which[
StringMatchQ[ m, "withdraw" ], withdraw,
StringMatchQ[ m, "deposit" ], deposit,
StringMatchQ[ m, "amount" ], amount,
(* else *)

True, Print["Unknown request -- MAKE_ACCOUNT ", m]
];

Return[ dispatch ];
]

Use as follows:


acc = makeAccount1[ 100 ] 
acc2 = makeAccount1[ 200 ]


dispatch99dispatch100


acc[  "withdraw" ][ 10 ]

90


acc2[ "withdraw" ][ 60 ]

140


acc2["amount"][]

140



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...