Skip to main content

Getting a usable expression tree


I need to get the expression tree for some expression.


expr //TreeForm

The above grabs the expression tree but it isn't in some sort of usable format. Just an image.


Level[expr, {-1}, "Heads"->True]


This does a depth first traversal of the expression tree and does give me a list of all items in the expression tree. The issue with this is that:


expr = a+b*3*c+d
Level[expr, {-1}, "Heads"->True]
{Plus, a, Times, 3, b, c, d}

and now you can see that because of the location of d I have no information on what goes where with Levels.


So the question is, is there a way for me to get the expression tree in some format where I can actually tell where everything is supposed to go?


Acceptable formats would be of the form of {operator/operatorFunctionName, symbol/value, {operator/operatorFunctionName, symbol/value, {... continues as far as can go}}, moreSymbolsRelatedToFirstOperation}


OR



{operator/operatorFunctionName, operator/operatorFunctionName, ...} {{symbol/valueForFirstOperator, ...}, {symbol/valueForSecondOperator,...}, ...}


OR any other similar format.



Answer



Please let me know if this is moving in the right direction:


expr = a + b*3*c + d;

Replace[expr, h_[x___] :> {x}, {0, -1}]


{a, {3, b, c}, d}


Given that heads are lost here, perhaps you want something like:


Replace[expr, h_[x___] :> {h, x}, {0, -1}]


{Plus, a, {Times, 3, b, c}, d}

If this is close to what you a related question that you should read is:
List manipulation to build a functional expression




Note: you may be tempted to try to simplify the code above by using ReplaceAll (short form /.) but you will find that it doesn't work. That's because the order of traversal is the opposite of Replace, despite the similar names.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more