Skip to main content

programming - How to use classical data structure in Mathematica



As a C programmer, I have used Mathematica for a month. In this process, I discovered that some problems cannot be solved via the built-ins, owing to lacking of data structure like binary tree, quartic tree, half-edge, etc. So I would like know how to use the classical data structure in Mathematica.


quadtree quadtree refinement



Answer



Here'a quad-tree index (trie) illustrating the compact codes and efficiency enabled by nested Associations and recursive Queries - no looping, no NestWhile or Fold is used.


Compare to earlier implementations, eg here. Also addresses "can a Trie be implemented efficiently?"


Included are timing studies suggesting empirical n*Log[n] complexity over 6 orders of magnitude.


Generic Helper Functions


jointKeyValueApply[f_][k_->v_]:=k->f[k,v]

associationKeyValueMap[f_]:=AssociationMap[jointKeyValueApply[f]]


This is a variation on KeyValueMap that preserves Association structure, eg:


<|"a" -> 1, "b" -> 2|> // associationKeyValueMap[f]


<|"a" -> f["a", 1], "b" -> f["b", 2]|>



Quad-Index Specific Helper Functions


boxMean[Rectangle[{x0_, y0_}, {x1_, y1_}]] := {x0 + x1, y0 + y1}/2;


boxSplit[Rectangle[{x0_, y0_}, {x1_, y1_}]] := {{x0, (x0 + x1)/2,
x1}, {y0, (y0 + y1)/2, y1}};

• boxClassify takes the truth-values output by GroupBy eg {True,False}, and maps them to coordinates.


boxClassify[r_Rectangle][{x_, 
y_}] := {boxSplit[
r], {x, y} /. {False -> {1, 2}, True -> {2, 3}}} //
Transpose // Map[Apply@Part] // Transpose // Apply[Rectangle];

• boundingBoxAssociation takes a key, eg "pos" here, and computes a bounding box and associates it as root key with the data as values.



 boundingBoxAssociation[pointKey_][data_List] :=  
Query[{Query[All, pointKey] /* transposeCommute[Map[MinMax]] /*
Apply[Rectangle], Identity} /* Apply[Rule] /* Association][
data];

Recursive Query


groupByQuad[bucketSize_][box_Rectangle, data_List] := 
If[Length[data] > bucketSize,
data // GroupBy[
Thread[#pos > boxMean[box] ] & /* boxClassify[box]] //

associationKeyValueMap[groupByQuad[bucketSize]], data];

Indexer Function


quadIndex[pointKey_, bucketSize_][data_List] := 
boundingBoxAssociation[pointKey][data] //
associationKeyValueMap[groupByQuad[bucketSize]];

USAGE


Point Cloud Association


• Foo is a generic to illustrate that payload can be associated with each point stored in "pos" key:



gaussianPointData[n_] :=  
RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[], {n, 2}] //
Map[<|"pos" -> #, "foo" -> 0|> &] ;

Dataset indexed to 6 orders of magnitude


pointDS = <|
Table[ToString[exp] -> gaussianPointData[10^exp], {exp, 1, 6}]|> //
Dataset;

That is:



pointDS[All, Length]

enter image description here


Timing Studies


• 2013 iMac w/ 32GB


timingStudy["bucket size 1"] = 
pointDS[All, quadIndex["pos", 1] /* Timing]; // Timing


{379.58, Null}




timingStudy["bucket size 5"] = 
pointDS[All, quadIndex["pos", 5] /* Timing]; // Timing


{285.578, Null}



• Timing by input size:


{timingStudy["bucket size 1"] [All, First], timingStudy["bucket size 5"] [All, First]}


enter image description here



• Plot


ListPlot[{Normal@timingStudy["bucket size 1"] [Values, First], 
Normal@timingStudy["bucket size 5"] [Values,
First], (#*Log[4, #]/30000. &) /@ Table[10^exp, {exp, 1, 6}] },
Joined -> True, PlotRange -> All, Frame -> True]

enter image description here


Figures


• Bucket size 1, 100pts


timingStudy["bucket size 1"][2, 

Last /* associationKeyFlatten][{Keys /* Flatten,
Query[Values, Apply[Point], "pos"]}] //
Normal // (Graphics[{FaceForm[None], EdgeForm[{Thin, Blue}], #},
PlotRange -> 3 {{-1, 1}, {-1, 1}}, Frame -> True] &)

enter image description here


• bucket size 1, 1k points:


timingStudy["bucket size 1"][3, 
Last /* associationKeyFlatten][{Keys /* Flatten,
Query[Values, Apply[Point], "pos"]}] //

Normal // (Graphics[{FaceForm[None], EdgeForm[{Thin, Blue}], #},
PlotRange -> 3.5 {{-1, 1}, {-1, 1}}, Frame -> True] &)

enter image description here


• bucket size 5, 1k points:


timingStudy["bucket size 10"][3, 
Last /* associationKeyFlatten][{Keys /* Flatten,
Query[Values, Map[Point], "pos"]}] //
Normal // (Graphics[{FaceForm[None], EdgeForm[{Thin, Blue}], #},
PlotRange -> 4 {{-1, 1}, {-1, 1}}, Frame -> True] &)


enter image description here


Output Description


• Showing nested Association (trie) structure


timingStudy["bucket size 1"][1, Last] // Normal


<|Rectangle[{-1.44554,-1.22553},{1.85318,0.992471}]-><|Rectangle[{0.203821,-0.116532},{1.85318,0.992471}]-><|Rectangle[{0.203821,0.43797},{1.0285,0.992471}]->{<|pos->{0.315051,0.992471},foo->0|>},Rectangle[{0.203821,-0.116532},{1.0285,0.43797}]->{<|pos->{0.496316,-0.0548369},foo->0|>}|>,Rectangle[{-1.44554,-0.116532},{0.203821,0.992471}]-><|Rectangle[{-0.62086,-0.116532},{0.203821,0.43797}]-><|Rectangle[{-0.20852,-0.116532},{0.203821,0.160719}]->{<|pos->{0.0416775,0.0817036},foo->0|>},Rectangle[{-0.62086,-0.116532},{-0.20852,0.160719}]->{<|pos->{-0.559806,-0.106714},foo->0|>}|>,Rectangle[{-1.44554,-0.116532},{-0.62086,0.43797}]->{<|pos->{-1.44554,-0.112904},foo->0|>}|>,Rectangle[{-1.44554,-1.22553},{0.203821,-0.116532}]-><|Rectangle[{-1.44554,-1.22553},{-0.62086,-0.671033}]-><|Rectangle[{-1.0332,-1.22553},{-0.62086,-0.948284}]-><|Rectangle[{-0.82703,-1.22553},{-0.62086,-1.08691}]-><|Rectangle[{-0.723945,-1.22553},{-0.62086,-1.15622}]->{<|pos->{-0.646667,-1.22553},foo->0|>},Rectangle[{-0.723945,-1.15622},{-0.62086,-1.08691}]->{<|pos->{-0.654308,-1.09372},foo->0|>}|>|>|>,Rectangle[{-0.62086,-1.22553},{0.203821,-0.671033}]->{<|pos->{-0.431171,-1.08481},foo->0|>},Rectangle[{-1.44554,-0.671033},{-0.62086,-0.116532}]->{<|pos->{-1.24569,-0.514815},foo->0|>}|>,Rectangle[{0.203821,-1.22553},{1.85318,-0.116532}]->{<|pos->{1.85318,-1.01392},foo->0|>}|>|>



• This is not a classical quad-tree in that GroupBy only generates keys depending on the values. For example, if a quadrant is empty, only 3 sub-notes will be generated.



• Additional services associated with such indexes such as lookup, insert, delete, are not addressed here.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],