Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to store values indexed by integer partitions for fast access?


I have a huge list of values indexed by integer partitions. If I store them simply in a list, then, when I want to access the value corresponding to some particular integer partition, I have to find the index of the given partition in the list of all partitions before I can access the value. This is slow. Is there a way to optimize this?


In my particular example, I have values indexed by pairs of partitions of the same integers. The first 4 levels look like this:



chars = {
{{1}},
{{1, 1}, {-1, 1}}, {{1, 1, 1}, {-1, 0, 2}, {1, -1, 1}},
{{1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {-1, 0, -1, 1, 3}, {0, -1, 2, 0, 2}, {1, 0, -1, -1, 3},
{-1, 1, 1, -1, 1}}
}

Then to access a particular value, I use this function:


maxn = 4;
YDs = Array[IntegerPartitions[#] &, maxn];


findChar[y1_, y2_] := Module[{l1, l2, n1, n2, i1, j1},
l1 = Length[y1];
l2 = Length[y2];
n1 = Sum[y1[[i]], {i, l1}];
n2 = Sum[y2[[i]], {i, l2}];
If[n1 != n2, Return["ERROR"];];
i1 = Position[YDs[[n1]], y1, Heads -> False][[1, 1]];
j1 = Position[YDs[[n2]], y2, Heads -> False][[1, 1]];
Return[chars[[n1, i1, j1]]];

];

This seems to be a pretty inefficient way, but I don't know how to do it more effectively in Mathematica.



Answer



Create a dispatch table of indexes. To illustrate, let's make over a million integer partitions to work with:


y = Flatten[Array[IntegerPartitions, 50], 1]; Length[y]


$1295970$




Associate each with an index via a Rule and optimize the subsequent rule replacements with a dispatch table:


table = Dispatch[Rule @@@ Transpose[{y, Range@Length@y}]];

(This precomputation takes $2.8$ seconds here.) To test its use, let's work out the indexes for a million randomly selected integer partitions:


x = RandomChoice[y, 10^6]; First@AbsoluteTiming@(x /. table)


$1.7851021$



In other words, it takes less than two microseconds on average to look up the index for any of these partitions. I hope this is fast enough for the intended application.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.